Help me please :(((((

Answer:

you have to put -160 over -16 then divide and your answer will be 10

so x=10. I hope this helps :)

Answer:8,5 recirpoal is 5,8

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.627

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The correct answer is,

[tex] - 6a - 12[/tex]

Answer:

-6(a+2)

Step-by-step explanation:

-2(8a + 6) + 10a

-16a-12+10a

Answer: It's the third one down

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

9. 1.6f + 0.4j - 13

11. -6y + 13

13. -1/2j + 15

Answer:

Hey

Step-by-step explanation:

Write the fraction in simplest form

[tex] - \frac{29}{18} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{8}{9} - \frac{5}{2} [/tex]

Find the difference between 8/9 and 5/-2

[tex] \frac{8}{9} - \frac{5}{2} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{8 \times 2}{9 \times 2} - \frac{5 \times 9}{2 \times 9} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{16}{18} - \frac{45}{18} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{16 - 45}{18} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{ - 29}{18} [/tex]

[tex] - \frac{29}{18} [/tex]

Answer:

Amount contributed by Oscar = $8

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

Amount spent on gift = $36

Amount contributed by Moriah = $12

Let,

x be the amount contributed by each of them.

Thus,

Gift total = Contribution of all

36 = x+x+x+12

36 = 3x+12

3x+12 = 36

3x=36-12

3x=24

Dividing both sides by 3

[tex]\frac{3x}{3}=\frac{24}{3}\\x=8[/tex]

Hence,

Amount contributed by Oscar = $8

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

It is letter A I got 100!

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

EDGE 2021

Answer:

quadrant 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

This series is convergent. The partial sums of this series converge to [tex]\displaystyle \frac{2}{3}[/tex].

Step-by-step explanation:

The [tex]n[/tex]th partial sum of a series is the sum of its first [tex]n\!\![/tex] terms. In symbols, if [tex]a_n[/tex] denote the [tex]n\![/tex]th term of the original series, the [tex]\! n[/tex]th partial sum of this series would be:

[tex]\begin{aligned} S_n &= \sum\limits_{k = 1}^{n} a_k \\ &= a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_{k}\end{aligned}[/tex].

A series is convergent if the limit of its partial sums, [tex]\displaystyle \lim\limits_{n \to \infty} S_{n}[/tex], exists (should be a finite number.)

In this question, the [tex]n[/tex]th term of this original series is:

[tex]\displaystyle a_{n} = \frac{{(-1)}^{n+1}}{{2}^{n}}[/tex].

The first thing to notice is the [tex]{(-1)}^{n+1}[/tex] in the expression for the [tex]n[/tex]th term of this series. Because of this expression, signs of consecutive terms of this series would alternate between positive and negative. This series is considered an alternating series.

One useful property of alternating series is that it would be relatively easy to find out if the series is convergent (in other words, whether [tex]\displaystyle \lim\limits_{n \to \infty} S_{n}[/tex] exists.)

If [tex]\lbrace a_n \rbrace[/tex] is an alternating series (signs of consecutive terms alternate,) it would be convergent (that is: the partial sum limit [tex]\displaystyle \lim\limits_{n \to \infty} S_{n}[/tex] exists) as long as [tex]\lim\limits_{n \to \infty} |a_{n}| = 0[/tex].

For the alternating series in this question, indeed:

[tex]\begin{aligned}\lim\limits_{n \to \infty} |a_n| &= \lim\limits_{n \to \infty} \left|\frac{{(-1)}^{n+1}}{{2}^{n}}\right| = \lim\limits_{n \to \infty} {\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}^{n} =0\end{aligned}[/tex].

Therefore, this series is indeed convergent. However, this conclusion doesn't give the exact value of [tex]\displaystyle \lim\limits_{n \to \infty} S_{n}[/tex]. The exact value of that limit needs to be found in other ways.

Notice that [tex]\lbrace a_n \rbrace[/tex] is a geometric series with the first term is [tex]a_0 = (-1)[/tex] while the common ratio is [tex]r = (- 1/ 2)[/tex]. Apply the formula for the sum of geometric series to find an expression for [tex]S_n[/tex]:

[tex]\begin{aligned}S_n &= \frac{a_0 \cdot \left(1 - r^{n}\right)}{1 - r} \\ &= \frac{\displaystyle (-1) \cdot \left(1 - {(-1 / 2)}^{n}\right)}{1 - (-1/2)} \\ &= \frac{-1 + {(-1 / 2)}^{n}}{3/2} = -\frac{2}{3} + \frac{2}{3} \cdot {\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)}^{n}\end{aligned}[/tex].

Evaluate the limit [tex]\displaystyle \lim\limits_{n \to \infty} S_{n}[/tex]:

[tex]\begin{aligned} \lim\limits_{n \to \infty} S_{n} &= \lim\limits_{n \to \infty} \left(-\frac{2}{3} + \frac{2}{3} \cdot {\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)}^{n}\right) \\ &= -\frac{2}{3} + \frac{2}{3} \cdot \underbrace{\lim\limits_{n \to \infty} \left[{\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)}^{n} \right] }_{0}= -\frac{2}{3}\end{aligned}}_[/tex].

Therefore, the partial sum of this series converges to [tex]\displaystyle \left(- \frac{2}{3}\right)[/tex].

Answer:

carios has greater angle

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps

Answer:

Answer D (-3.125)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\mathrm{No\: solutions}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Since Connor has worked 12 hours walking dogs, he's earned [tex]12\cdot 8 = \$96[/tex] from walking dogs. He still needs to earn [tex]\$160-\$96=\$64[/tex]. As stated in the problem, he makes $12 an hour landscaping, therefore the minimum number of whole hours he must work to fulfill his requirements is [tex]\lceil{ \frac{64}{12} \rceil = 6\: \mathrm{hours}[/tex]. However, the problem states he can only work a maximum of 15 hours. He would have to work [tex]12+6=18[/tex] to fulfill his requirements and therefore he will not be able to meet his requirements with the restrictions given.

Answer:

im sure its D.)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 3.2x = 48

Step-by-step explanation: So that means x = 15.

Answer:

a) The z-score for a backyard structure costing $2300 is -0.57.

b) The z-score for a backyard structure costing $4900 is 1.29

c) A backyard structure costing $2300 costs 0.57 standard deviations below the mean, while a backyard structure costing $4900 costs 1.29 standard deviations above the mean. Since both are within 2 standard deviations of the mean, none is an outlier.

d) Since this combination costs more than 2 standard deviations from the mean, yes, it should be considered an outlier.

Step-by-step explanation:

Z-score:

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

If the z-score is more than two standard deviations from the mean(lesser than -2 or more than 2), the score X is considered an outlier.

In this question, we have that:

[tex]\mu = 3100, \sigma = 1400[/tex]

a. What is the z-score for a backyard structure costing $2300?

We have to find Z when [tex]X = 2300[/tex]. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{2300 - 3100}{1400}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -0.57[/tex]

The z-score for a backyard structure costing $2300 is -0.57.

b. What is the z-score for a backyard structure costing $4900?

We have to find Z when [tex]X = 2300[/tex]. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{4900 - 3100}{1400}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.29[/tex]

The z-score for a backyard structure costing $4900 is 1.29

c. Interpret the z-scores in parts (a) and (b). Comment on whether either should be considered an outlier.

A backyard structure costing $2300 costs 0.57 standard deviations below the mean, while a backyard structure costing $4900 costs 1.29 standard deviations above the mean. Since both are within 2 standard deviations of the mean, none is an outlier.

d. If the cost for a backyard shed-office combination built in Albany, California, is $13,000, should this structure be considered an outlier?

We have to find the z-score when X = 13000. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{13000 - 3100}{1400}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 7.07[/tex]

Since this combination costs more than 2 standard deviations from the mean, yes, it should be considered an outlier.

Answer: 4n^2

Step-by-step explanation: -3n^2 - (-7n^2) = -3n^2 + 7n^2= 4n^2. When adding and subtracting the exponents stay the same only the coefficients are subtracted or added

Hi.. U should do like this

4/5 mile in 50 min

X mile in 60 min

X=5/4 mile

Answer:

5 milesss

:)))

Answer:

The answer is 154.8 ml

Step-by-step explanation:

In this question, the amount of pure acid is 18% of the total solution, that is, 18% of 860 milliliters. So

0.18*860 = 154.8 ml

The answer is 154.8 ml

Answer:

[tex](-4, 1) \: and \: (-4,7)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]the \: shortest \: distance \: between \: two \: points \: can \: be \: used \: here \to \\ were : d = \sqrt{ (x_{2} -x_{1} ) {}^{2} + (y_{2} -y_{1} ) {}^{2} } \\checking \: for \: the \: pair \to \: (-4, 1) \: and \: (-4,7) \\ d = \sqrt{ (( - 4)-( - 4)) {}^{2} + (7 -1 ) {}^{2} } \\ d = \sqrt{ (- 4 + 4) {}^{2} + (6) {}^{2} } \\ d = \sqrt{ (0) {}^{2} + (6) {}^{2} } \\ d = \sqrt{ (6) {}^{2} } \\ \underline{ \boxed{d = 6}}[/tex]

Answer: x > - 18

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

45

Step-by-step explanation:

4.50 × 10 =45!

.

.

.

.

.

.?

.

.

.

.

.

Answer:

$15

Step-by-step explanation:

$4.50 time 3 = $13.50 (9 lbs)

$4.50 divided by 3 = $1.50 (1 lb)

$1.50 plus $13.50 = $15

Answer:

the slope is 4,3 and the y intercept is 2

Answer:

Niiger

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Slope of a line passing through ([tex]x_{1}[/tex],[tex]y_{1}[/tex]) and ([tex]x_{2} , y_{2}[/tex]) is given by:

[tex]\frac{y_{2}-y_{1} }{x_{2}-x_{1}}[/tex]

Now,

Slope of line L, (m) = [tex]\frac{-3-(-1)}{-2-2}[/tex] = 0.5

Slope of line M, (n) = [tex]\frac{-1-1}{W-1}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{-2}{W-1}[/tex]

If the lines L and M are parallel to each other,

m = n

or, 0.5 = [tex]\frac{-2}{W-1}[/tex]

or, 0.5 (W - 1) = -2

or, W - 1 = -4

or, W = -3

Therefore the required value of W is -3.

Answer:

[tex] {x}^{2} + {x}^{2} = {(8 \sqrt{2}) }^{2} \\ 2 {x}^{2} = 128 \\ {x}^{2} = 64 \\ \boxed{x = 8}[/tex]

Answer: Total cost would be 10,320

Step-by-step explanation: Hope this helps