From 1997 - 2001 the number n (in millions) of black-and-white TV S sold in the U.S. Can be modeled by n = 26.8 * (0.85) ^ t where t is the number of years since 1997.

Answer:

The answer will b 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer is t.

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to find the sum of opposite of - 10t and t - 10t.

Opposite of -10t = 10 t

So,

10t + (t-10t)

Grouping the numbers,

(10t+(-10t)) + t

= 0 + t

= t

Hence, the answer is t.

Answer:

1. D

2. y = 15.50x + 450

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Since it is a function, the missing pair can't repeat input values with different output, therefore only option D is unique so is the correct choice.

2. x  > (y - 450)/ 15.50

i) Rita gets paid $450 per week.

ii) She gets $15.50 for every new membership she sells.

iii) let y represent the total pay per week.

iv) let x represent the number of new memberships sold.

v) the equation representing total pay is y = 15.50x + 450.

vii) therefore the equation that represents a higher rate of membership sold is given by  x  > (y - 450)/ 15.50

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation: your welcome have a good day

Answer:

C.  [tex] \dfrac{1}{3x + 1} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \dfrac{x + 2}{x^3 + 2x^2 - 9x - 18} \div \dfrac{3x + 1}{x^2 - 9} = [/tex]

Factor all polynomials.

[tex] = \dfrac{x + 2}{x^2(x + 2) -9(x + 2)} \div \dfrac{3x + 1}{(x + 3)(x - 3)} [/tex]

[tex] = \dfrac{x + 2}{(x^2 - 9)(x + 2)} \div \dfrac{3x + 1}{(x + 3)(x - 3)} [/tex]

[tex] = \dfrac{x + 2}{(x + 3)(x - 3)(x + 2)} \div \dfrac{3x + 1}{(x + 3)(x - 3)} [/tex]

To divide by a fraction, multiply by its reciprocal.

[tex] = \dfrac{x + 2}{(x + 3)(x - 3)(x + 2)} \times \dfrac{(x + 3)(x - 3)}{3x + 1} [/tex]

Cancel out common factors in the numerator and denominator.

[tex] = \dfrac{1}{3x + 1} [/tex]

Answer:

(3, -3)

Step-by-step explanation:

A point qualifies as a solution to a system of inequalities if it is true when both of its x and y values are substituted into the both inequalities. Knowing this, let's plug in the first option, (3, -3), into both inequalities.

Let's try 6x + 3y > 3 first. Substitute 3 for x and -3 for y:

[tex]6 (3) + 3 (-3) > 3\\18 - 9 > 3\\9 > 3[/tex]

9 is bigger than 3, so (3, -3) is a solution to that inequality.

Let's try [tex]x -y \geq 4[/tex]. Do the same, substituting the same values:

[tex]3 - (-3) \geq 4\\3 + 3 \geq 4\\6\geq 4[/tex]

6 is bigger than 4, so (3, -3) is a solution to that inequality too.

Since (3, -3) is a solution to both inequalities, it must be the answer.

Answer:

300 gallons per hour.

Step-by-step explanation:

It takes 4 of 1/4 hours to make 1 hour. Now multiply gallons per quarter hour by four.

75 x 4 = 300

Answer:

I believe the answer is 6 times more.

Step-by-step explanation:

And I know ur gonna scam I'm just willing to help

Answer:

9/4x to the power of one plus 12y to the power of one

Step-by-step explanation:

You can add the top numbers for 9, but cant add the bottoms since they are different variables.

Answer:

[tex]\frac{6y+7x}{12xy}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

i hope this helps :)

Answer:

44.821869662

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-56

Step-by-step explanation:

-7 x 8= -56

Answer:

The answer should be 14/15.

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer is 14/15 because -2/5 and 4/3 with a common denominator turns into -6/15 and 20/15.

Then you add both of them together.

-6/15 + 20/15 = 14/15

Answer:

the last option is the right answer

Step-by-step explanation:

last week:

d = 18

d = 18h = 6

this week:

d = 2.5h

i. if she walked for 6 hours this week, h = 6

d = 2.5h

d = 2.5 × 6

d = 15

* this means she walked at slower pace this week as she can only cover 15 miles in 6 hours whereas she can cover 18 miles in 6 hours last week

ii. if she walked for 18 miles this week, d = 18

d = 2.5h

18 = 2.5h

h = 18/ 2.5

h = 7.2

* this means she walked at a slower pace this week as she needs 7.2 hours to cover 18 miles whereas she only need 6 hours last week

Answer:

c transportation

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

55

Step-by-step explanation:

75+50=125

180-125=55

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

it means the ABC And DEF have side lengths of 15,19, 25

so 3x-3 = 15

x = 6

5-y = 19

so y = -14

Answer:

$1.75

Step-by-step explanation:

Set up a system of equations where x is the cost of a corndog and y is the cost of a coke:

3x + y = 7.1

2x + 2y = 7.2

Solve by elimination by multiplying the top equation by -2

-6x - 2y = -14.2

2x + 2y = 7.2

Add them together:

-4x = -7

x = 1.75

So, the cost of one corndog is $1.75

Sorry I tried doe

(The answer I got would be in the negatives, I don't think that would be correct)

Answer:

:)

Step-by-step explanation:

i think it's MODE 21........

Answer:

"The World Ocean." The Columbia Encyclopedia. CD-ROM. 2007, 6th Ed. New York: Columbia University Press. "The World ocean has an area of about 361 million sq km (139,400,000 sq mi), an average depth of about 3,730 m (12,230)

Viau, Elizabeth Anne. World Builders: Water on Earth. California State University Los Angeles. 2003.

There are two origins of water: comets (extraterrestrial bombardment) and out gassing (condensation of steam from early volcanism). These processes are continuing today.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 4

Step-by-step explanation: 20-10=10 which is %50. 20-16=4

Answer:

Here, for example, is square inch pricing, using a multiplier of 2.5 (ie, $2.50 per square inch):

4×4 inches = 16 square inches x 2.5 = $40

8×8 inches = 64 square inches x 2.5 = $160

16×16 inches = 256 square inches x 2.5 = $640

24×24 inches = 576 square inches x 2.5 = $1,440

32×32 inches = 1,024 square inches x 2.5 = $2,560

I don’t know about you, but $40 seems awfully small price for a painting by someone who commands $2,560 for a 32×32 canvas.

Here are the same canvas sizes using linear inch pricing, using a multiplier of 20 (ie, $20.00 per linear inch) — as you can see, the difference in price feels a lot less out-of whack:

4+4 inches = 8 linear inches x 20 = $160

8+8 inches = 16 linear inches x 20 = $320

16+16 inches = 32 linear inches x 20 = $640

24+24 inches = 48 linear inches x 20 = $960

32+32 inches = 64 linear inches x 20 = $1,280

Neither of these pricing methods is “right” or “wrong,” but once you determine your method and your multiplier, charging by size can be a very helpful way to eliminate the guesswork, and feel confident about your pricing.

Different Pricing for Different Media?

One possible modifier to your size-based pricing structure is the media you paint with. If you only paint watercolors, or only paint oils, there’s no problem, but if you paint both on canvas and on paper, as I do, it gets a little tricky.

For whatever reason, paintings on paper tend to sell for less than paintings on canvas — even though they require framing, which is an added expense. In my case, if I were to pay to have a piece framed, my costs become much higher for a work on paper than for a canvas painting! What’s an artist to do?

(And remember that pricing your prints is an entirely different topic.)

I don’t have a final answer to this question, except to refer you to the item below…

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Here, for example, is square inch pricing, using a multiplier of 2.5 (ie, $2.50 per square inch):

4×4 inches = 16 square inches x 2.5 = $40

8×8 inches = 64 square inches x 2.5 = $160

16×16 inches = 256 square inches x 2.5 = $640

24×24 inches = 576 square inches x 2.5 = $1,440

32×32 inches = 1,024 square inches x 2.5 = $2,560

I don’t know about you, but $40 seems awfully small price for a painting by someone who commands $2,560 for a 32×32 canvas.

Here are the same canvas sizes using linear inch pricing, using a multiplier of 20 (ie, $20.00 per linear inch) — as you can see, the difference in price feels a lot less out-of whack:

4+4 inches = 8 linear inches x 20 = $160

8+8 inches = 16 linear inches x 20 = $320

16+16 inches = 32 linear inches x 20 = $640

24+24 inches = 48 linear inches x 20 = $960

32+32 inches = 64 linear inches x 20 = $1,280

Neither of these pricing methods is “right” or “wrong,” but once you determine your method and your multiplier, charging by size can be a very helpful way to eliminate the guesswork, and feel confident about your pricing.

Different Pricing for Different Media?

One possible modifier to your size-based pricing structure is the media you paint with. If you only paint watercolors, or only paint oils, there’s no problem, but if you paint both on canvas and on paper, as I do, it gets a little tricky.

For whatever reason, paintings on paper tend to sell for less than paintings on canvas — even though they require framing, which is an added expense. In my case, if I were to pay to have a piece framed, my costs become much higher for a work on paper than for a canvas painting! What’s an artist to do?

(And remember that pricing your prints is an entirely different topic.)

I don’t have a final answer to this question, except to refer you to the item below…

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex] 10 \sqrt{2} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \sqrt{200} = \sqrt{100 \times 2} \\ \\ = \sqrt{ {10}^{2} \times 2} = 10 \sqrt{2} \\ [/tex]

Answer:

(2,8)

Step-by-step explanation:

If we plot both points on the graph and start at (4,5) we count up (rise) 2 and to the right (run) 8. This means they are both positive numbers as it goes up and to the right.

*Down or to the left would be negative.

Answer:

z=-13/7

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Add 3z(7z+5=-8)

2. Subtract 5(7z=-13)

3. Divide 7(z=-13/7)

728282636381919191828273737363839038373637373

Answer:

NO. BECAUSE U NEED 4 POINTS TO FIND THE VALUE THERES ONLY THREE!!!

Step-by-step explanation:

SEE the IMAGE for Solution

HOPE it HELPS

Have a GREAT DAY

Yes its sufficient .

How?Steps?

Formula:-

[tex]\boxed{\sf Area\:of\:triangle=\dfrac{1}{2}\mid x_1(y_2-y_3)+x_2(y_3-y_1)+x_3(y_1-y_2)\mid}[/tex]

Answer:

10 i guess

cause

8*3=24

3*10=30

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the scale factor of the large to small triangle is 3 : 1, the side lengths of the small triangle are 1/3 of the big triangle side lengths. (such as 8 compared to 24)

Therefore 3x = 30 and x = 10.

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

For this, we need to know the scale factor first. We can do that by looking at a same side of the two shapes.

CD = 2 and ML = 3.6

3.6 / 2 = 1.8

just to confirm, let's take MN = 7.2 and DE = 4

7.2 / 4 = 1.8

So now we know the scale factor is 1.8

Now to figure out x, we just need to use BA = 5

and because the scale factor is 1.8

so we just need to do: 5 * 1.8 = 9

Answer:

ff

Step-by-step explanation: