Answer:
The awnser is Hyperbole
Please help with these grammar questions:
The caravan was tired of ""travelling for long hours"" in the desert.
Gerundial phrase
Participle
Adverb
Participle adjective
I try to reach any person ""who has some advance knowledge of my subject"".
Adjective phrase
Adverb phrase
Adverb clause
Adjective clause
Since time immemorial, female segment of the society is oppressed because of male chauvinism.
Simple sentence
Complex sentence
Compound sentence
Compound complex sentence
He replied ""he was the boss of the entire crew."" The underlined part of the sentence
Adverb clause
Adverb phrase
Adjective clause
The ""divide"" among real brothers was heart breaking.
Noun
Verb
Adjective
Adverb
The mother set the table for her children on last Friday.
Simple Present
Simple Future
Simple Past
Past Perfect
The letter brought a tiding ""for"" the candidate as he had been selected.
Coordinate Conjunction
Adjective
Adverb
Preposition
I can give you the details of the incident ""but"" I fear you won’t get it.
Adversative
Co relative
Illative
Sub ordinate
The weather ""has been"" getting slightly warm today.
Linking verb
Modal verb
Helping verb
State verb
Answer:verb is slightly
Explanation:
Pretend you are a part of the audience for the formal debate shown in the video below. Summarize the key points of both the affirmative and the opposing side. Then conduct some additional research to better inform yourself about the pros and cons of technology and smart devices, including the impact they have on the developing human brain. Finally, explain which side you agree with and why.
here is the transcript
"There's n othing smart about personalized intimate technology. It simply confirms our misplac ed ideal that the world revolv es around us.
Smart technology has made us smart in some unexpected ways. It's made us more responsive. It's made us more engaged.
What we've created, in other words, is an environment that is constantly frustrating our mind's ability to create deep knowledge into think deeply.
This is the greatest time in human history to be wanting to know. There is no better time. The access to information has never been this free.
We're losing that contemplative deep focused attentive state of mind that is crucial to the creation of knowledge, the creation of intelligence, and deep thinking in general.
In this age of constant distraction-- we can't focus-- we're watching seven years of Game of Th rones, the most complex narrative that we've ever seen in our world. Our universities are turning out experts and scholars who are deep into their topics-- deeper than ever, because they can go that deep because of the internet. We are knowing more and better than ever.
What we're losing is the sub tlety, the depth, the sophistication of thought. In an odd way, perhaps we're becoming like machi nes. But that, in an odd way, as well makes us du mber than we once were.
There are lots of things that people do with technology in this current moment that may not rise to the bar of tenured faculty and book writers. That doesn't necessarily mean it's dum b. What is d umb, and what is lying underneath that judgment? Buried in that is notions about what is appropriate disco urse, what is sufficiently merit-worthy.
We're not all broadcasting these deep thoughts. Were sending out links to sill y videos. We're going-- spending huge amounts of time on Fac ebook. We're spending lots of time on T witter, sending Snapc hats.
We've never had an opportunity like this, the ability to participate in the creation of knowledge. This is the smartest age we've ever had."
Answer and Explanation:
We cannot deny that the emergence of smart devices has facilitated human life in several areas, making access to information quick and practical, allowing individuals to communicate quickly, in addition to allowing quick storage of any desired information. Nowadays it is impossible to imagine our life without these devices, since we depend on them for almost all of our activities.
However, the ease of information has made our brain unaccustomed to being reflective, questioning and thoughtful, making us less intelligent, because with Smart devices we have access to ready-made information and we don't need to stimulate thinking to learn and search for it. This is what the book "The shallows: what the internet is doing to our brains" written by journalist Nicholas Carr mstra. The book presents how the dependence on smarts has impaired our concentration and reflection, making our brain less fast and efficient.
What effect does the speaker's use of personification have on the theme of the poem? Cite evidence in your answer.
The poem is Because I could not stop for death, by Emily Dickinson
Answer: Personification in this poem shows how even inanimate objects such as the dew and the grain were wary or afraid of death. This adds a sense that the character is in a carrage with something very fearful, yet her manner of writing does not seem to hint at her fear.
"We passed the Fields of Gazing Grain"
"The Dews drew quivering and Chill"
Hamartia means excessive pride
Select one:
True
False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
hamartia, pronounced hah-mahr-tee--uh, is derived from the Greek phrase hamartanein meaning “to err” or “to miss the mark.” Hamartia includes character flaws such as excessive ambition, greed, or pride which result in tragic consequences.
Why should journalists avoid using too many big words?
O A.
Readers cannot understand big words.
OB. They can make an article seem heavy.
O C. They run the risk of misusing the big words.
OD.
Readers have a hard time finding the facts.
Answer:
Journalists avoid using too many big words because readers cannot understand big words. Therefore, the answer. A. Readers cannot understand big words.
Answer:
C. They run the risk of missusing these words.
Explanation:
How many times have you used a big word you thought you knew the definition to only to find out you have to use it a cirtain way, welp that's why it would be C. Pluuuss, It was in my instructions. And taking times text so gotta go!
Hope this helped!
Battle in your own words sentences
Answer: We lost many men in the long-lasting battle but in the end, we won. Our bruises and blood were washed away from the glory of winning. The death of our brothers was not in vain.
Which statement from the passage supports the conclusion that Mr. Keller had been previously married?
Doctor: Ive never seen a baby with more vitality, that's the truth.
Keller: Ive brought up two of them, but this is my wife's first, she isn't battle-scarred yet.
Kate: I don't see what's so cute about a congestion just because it's yours.
Doctor: You're a pair of lucky parents.
Foreshadowing in “A Man Who Had No Eyes” PLS HELP!!!!!
How does Thoreau support his claim in this excerpt?
A.
He uses reasoning, showing the logical consequences of supporting a cause that is wrong.
B.
He tells an anecdote about a townsman who refused to “march to Mexico” and what happened to him.
C.
He shares statistics about casualties in the Mexican-American War.
D.
He uses measurable evidence about the number of people who have refused to join the US Army.
Answer:
this isn't an answer but I'm wondering as well, I'm terrible at English and I think it sucks.
Explanation:
i could be c
Thoreau supports his claim in this excerpt: He shares statistics about casualties in the Mexican-American War. Thus, option C is the correct option.
What was Thoreau's main focus?Thoreau offers distinctive contributions to ontology, the philosophy of science, and radical political thinking in addition to his emphasis on ethics in an existential sense. Although though his writings on natural science were not even published until the late 20th century, despite the justifiable fame of his political articles, they assist to paint a more full picture of him as a thinker.
A series of manuscript volumes containing information on Native American religion and culture was one of the manuscripts he left incomplete. Thoreau's writings represent a perennially valuable challenge to our understanding of the processes and goals of philosophy itself and foreshadow certain subsequent advances in pragmatism, phenomenology, and environmental philosophy.
Learn more about Thoreau here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590105
#SPJ3
Choose the best greeting*
A- Morning, Hannah speaking. How may I help you?"
B- This is Hannah. What now?"
C-Good morning, UUM Bursary, this is Hannah speaking. How may I assist you?"
D- Good morning. How may I help you?"
Answer: D is the best
Explanation:
K which name should i name my oc for my writing project knives or atlas
Which of the following demonstrates academic integrity in your writing? Select all that apply.
Ethical use of other people's work to support, comment upon and add to your own ideas
Referencing the sources you use in-text and at the end of your assignment
Making notes for your assignment without recording the details of your sources
Paraphrasing, summarising and synthesising the ideas of others into your assignment
Compare and contrast the two representations of "Twelfth Song of Thunder." Write a paragraph (100 to 150 words) explaining the similarities and differences in each adaptation. Be sure to use specific examples from each media type.
The similarities are that the 20th song of thunder had a contrast in it which represented in the movie but because of the representation of vendor dragons they did not cooperate because of the poem and the video is not the same
(Branliest will be appreciated)
Answer:
Edmentum sample answer!!!
Explanation:
Here are some similarities between the video and the poem:
Both try to create the sound effect of the echoing thunder. The video does it by including actual thunder sounds. The poem does it by using the literary device of repetition.
Both versions show the beauty and power of nature.
Here are some differences between the video and the poem:
The poem mentions the sights of nature such as grasshoppers and plants. The video shows actual images from nature.
The video provides background information about the origins of the poem and its importance to the Navajo. The poem does not provide any such explanation.
The video has sound effects, which the poem does not have.
The text gives readers time to consider the symbolism and imagery in the poem, which the video does not.
The text allows the readers to use their imaginations, but the video does not.
PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST I REALLY NEED IT!!!
Please give a LOGICAL reason to support this statement:
Modern technology makes an important contribution to education by enabling students to learn.
I will give branliest, i just need this ASAP (yall can give me more than one answer aight)
Answer:
Modern technology gives access to learning to students who can't get to school due to disability or lack of resources
Through using modern technology such as the internet, people are able to get answers to questions quickly and accurately
Technology provides different versions of the same lessons allowing students to learn in a way that they understand
Explanation:
Well, reason to support this statement is in the positive side of modern technology. It really is helpful when you need to study, but there are some fake informations too. We all know that this pandemic situation was followed with online learning. So, here you go, we studied online but in my case only students who knew something about modern technology and knew how to use it properly made success. It is really hard to work by yourself but with modern technology you can find solutions for that too.