Conjunct adverb usage: Clearly, the evidence that is more likely than not to outweigh the opposing evidence, or sufficient evidence to overcome doubt or speculation, is the evidence that is the most reliable and convincing.
This evidence should be specific, relevant and reliable, and should be supported by other evidence. It should be sufficient to convince a reasonable person that one conclusion is more likely than another. Conjunct adverbs, such as 'clearly' or 'undeniably', can be used to emphasize the strength of this evidence and to enhance its persuasive power. Conjunct adverbs are a type of adverb used to join two independent clauses together, making them into one larger sentence. They signal that a relationship exists between the two clauses, and provide emphasis and clarity to the reader. Examples of conjunct adverbs include: however, therefore, thus, hence, otherwise, nevertheless, and accordingly. By using conjunct adverbs, writers can easily connect two independent clauses, providing smoother transitions and clearer meaning.
Learn more about Conjunct adverbs here
https://brainly.com/question/984544
#SPJ4
in complex litigation involving the laws of several states, the state whose law will be used is determined by reference to
The choice of law rules of the forum state.
In complex litigation involving the laws of several states, the court must determine which state's law will be used to govern the case. This determination is made by reference to the choice of law rules of the forum state, which is the state in which the case is being heard. These rules can vary from state to state, but generally, they take into account factors such as the place of the injury, the place of the contract, the place of the conduct, and the parties' domicile or residence.
For example, if a case involving a car accident in which a person was injured in one state and the defendant is from another state, the court will apply the choice of law rules of the forum state to determine which state's law should apply to the case. The court will consider factors such as where the accident occurred, the residence of the parties, and the place of conduct.
In some cases, the forum state may have a strong connection to the case and its laws will be applied. In other cases, it may be more appropriate for the laws of another state to be applied. The choice of law rules of the forum state provides a framework for determining which state's law should apply in complex multi-state litigation.
To learn more about multi-state litigation Click
https://brainly.com/question/9766438
#SPJ4
According to Alabama boating law, which of these is consider legal operation? operating at less than 5 mph in a "slow, no wake" speed area.
A legal operation in Alabama is operating at less than 5 mph in a "slow, no wake" speed area.
What is a legal operation?The term "legal operations" (or "legal ops") refers to a group of business procedures, tasks, and personnel that enable legal departments to provide legal services to customers more successfully by integrating business and technological procedures.
"Legal Operations" refers to a group of business procedures, tasks, and individuals who help legal departments better serve their clients.
Legal operations, also referred to as "legal ops," are the collection of all business endeavors, procedures, and personnel that enable an in-house
Read more on legal operations here: https://brainly.com/question/1922718
#SPJ1
the 5 places where laws come from?
The places where laws come from are Legislation, parliament, general customes, common law and supreme court.
Where do the majority of our laws originate?
Congress, the federal government's legislative body, is in charge of passing laws on a national level. The two legislative houses that make up Congress are the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. Any member of anybody who was elected may propose a law. A bill is an idea for a new law.
What are the five primary legal frameworks in the US?
The United States Constitution, state constitutions, federal and state statutes, common law, case law, and administrative law are the main sources of law in the country.
Know more about laws- brainly.com/question/29512112
#SPJ1
which of these statements best explains why the voting rights act of 1965 has been important to expanding political participation in the united states?
It implemented the Fifteenth Amendment by keeping states from utilizing legal barriers to keep African Americans from voting.
This "act to implement the fifteenth amendment to the Constitution" was endorsed into regulation 95 years after the amendment was approved. In those years, African Americans in the South confronted colossal deterrents to voting, including survey charges, proficiency tests, and other administrative limitations to deny them the option to cast a ballot. They additionally gambled with provocation, terrorizing, monetary responses, and actual viciousness when they attempted to enroll or cast a ballot. Subsequently, African-American citizen enrollment was restricted, alongside political power.
In 1964, various tranquil shows were coordinated by Civil Rights pioneers, and the impressive brutality they were met with carried restored consideration regarding the issue of voting rights.
to know more about fifteenth amendment click here:
https://brainly.com/question/620540
#SPJ4
fill in the blank. the___was established by the wagner act to oversee labor-management relations. group of answer choices commission on labor relations federal trade commission national labor relations board equal employment opportunity commission
The National Labor Relations Board was established by the Wagner Act to oversee labor-management relations.
With or without a union, employees in the private sector have the right to form associations to collectively bargain for better pay and working conditions. This freedom is protected by the National Labor Relations Board, an independent federal agency. To regulate labor-management relations, the Wagner Act established it.
It was passed with the intention of defending employees' rights to establish and join unions, engage in collective bargaining, and take part in other concerted activities for the benefit of collective bargaining or other forms of mutual aid or protection. The Wagner Act's requirements must be enforced by the NLRB, which is also in charge of making sure that both employees' and employers' rights are upheld.
Read more about National Labor Relations Board on:
https://brainly.com/question/14457005
#SPJ4
the spanish king adopted which of the following policies for enslaved africans who escaped english territory to st. augustine, florida? slaves escaping from the english were freed slaves escaping from the english were executed slaves escaping from the english were sold to the caribbean slaves escaping from the english were exchanged for spanish prisoners of war
The Spanish King adopted the policy of freeing slaves who escaped from English territory to St. Augustine, Florida. Any slaves who escaped from the English were granted freedom and could not be re-enslaved. Furthermore, the Spanish King provided for these freed slaves by offering them jobs and housing. The Spanish also did not sell any of the escaped slaves to the Caribbean, nor did they exchange them for Spanish prisoners of war.
The Spanish King implemented the following policy for enslaved Africans who escaped from English territory to St. Augustine, Florida: those who escaped from the English were granted their freedom, those who were captured were put to death, those who were sold were sent to the Caribbean, and those who were captured were exchanged for Spanish prisoners of war.
The Spanish King is a powerful figure in the Spanish monarchy. He is the head of state and has been since the 15th century. He is responsible for making laws, appointing ministers, and representing Spain on the international stage. He is also responsible for ensuring that Spain remains a strong and prosperous nation. The Spanish King has a long history of being an influential leader in Europe and around the world. His presence has helped to shape Spain's culture, economy, and politics for centuries.The Spanish monarchy is a monarchy that has been in existence since the 15th century, and is currently headed by King Felipe VI. Throughout its centuries-long history, the Spanish monarchy has been a source of stability and continuity in the country, providing a strong sense of national identity. In addition to its political power, the monarchy is a respected symbol of Spanish culture and heritage, and is deeply connected to the country's many religious and historical traditions. Furthermore, the monarchy has also played an important role in the development of the Spanish economy, with the current king actively promoting business and investment opportunities both domestically and abroad. As such, the Spanish monarchy continues to be an integral part of the nation's identity, and a vital source of strength and unity.
Learn more about Spanish King here
https://brainly.com/question/3502884
#SPJ4
which of the following statements describes the freedmen's bureau, which originated in 1865? it was originally proposed in lincoln's ten percent plan, which congress defeated. founded by ex-confederate states, the organization helped rebuild the south. created by private citizens, the agency provided aid to former slaves. created by congress, it helped ex-slaves adjust to freedom and secure their basic civil rights.
The Freedmen's Bureau, created in 1865, originated from Lincoln's Ten Percent Plan which Congress had defeated. Founded by ex-Confederate states, the organization helped rebuild the South, while it was created by private citizens to provide aid to former slaves.
Lastly, the agency was created by Congress to help ex-slaves adjust to freedom and secure their basic civil rights. Thus, it was a multifaceted organization that sought to help former slaves and rebuild the South.The Freedmen's Bureau, established in 1865, was a government agency created to protect recently emancipated African Americans. It provided assistance with food, housing, education, employment, civil rights protection, and medical care. Additionally, the Bureau helped to settle disputes between former slaves and their former owners, as well as in labor disputes between former slaves and employers. In its nine-year tenure, the Freedmen's Bureau provided invaluable services to millions of African Americans, helping them to make the transition from slavery to freedom. Furthermore, its legacy remains today, as it set the precedent for civil rights protection and government assistance for those in need.
Learn more about freedmen's bureau here
https://brainly.com/question/11397862
#SPJ4
In order to identify issues in the tax research process, the tax preparer should get a good understanding of the ___________ __________. Then, the tax preparer can combine that information with his knowledge of the tax laws.
In order to identify issues in the tax research process, the tax preparer should get a good understanding of the client's facts.
Understanding the branches of the government that provide fundamental tax authority, whether it be statutory, regulatory, or case law, is crucial for conducting tax research.
Additionally, it is beneficial to comprehend the several administrative documents that the IRS and the Treasury Department have produced, some of which are obligatory and some of which are prescriptive.
Similar guidelines apply to basic legal research as they do to federal tax research. One needs to being by establish the important facts first.
This would include answering certain questions such as the what is being taxed, for what period and at whom.
Check to see if the transaction is in progress or finished.
Next, list the relevant problems. Third, find the pertinent statutory text in the Internal Revenue Code, which is the main body of applicable court and administrative law.
To know more about tax research process,, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28358657
#SPJ4
One purpose of ________ is to provide an opportunity for bail.adjudication preliminary hearing first appearance indictment
One purpose of first appearance is to provide an opportunity for bail adjudication preliminary hearing first appearance indictment.
The court should give a warrant — or at the public authority's solicitation, a request — for every respondent named in a prosecution or named in an information in the event that at least one oaths going with the information lay out reasonable justification to accept that an offense has been committed and that the litigant committed it. The court might give more than one warrant or request for a similar respondent. In the event that a respondent neglects to show up in light of a request, the court may, endless supply of a lawyer for the public authority must, issue a warrant. The court should give the capture warrant to an officer approved to execute it or the request to an individual approved to serve it.
Where bail is conceded to an individual engaged with a criminal investigation or charge, they are permitted to stay out in people in general while they are either anticipating further investigations or court appearance, rather than being confined in custody.
to know more about custody click here:
https://brainly.com/question/6995123
#SPJ4
Which of the following is an example of a lower tier, bureau-level agency, within a department?
The National Park Service is an example of a lower tier, bureau-level agency, within a department.
The National Park Service is part of the U.S. Department of the Interior and is responsible for managing and preserving the national parks, monuments, and other protected areas of the United States.
The National Park Service is just one example of a lower tier, bureau-level agency within a department. Other examples include the Bureau of Land Management (within the U.S. Department of the Interior), the Office of Management and Budget (within the U.S. Executive Office of the President), and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (within the U.S. Department of Commerce). All of these agencies are tasked with specific regulatory and/or management functions within their respective departments.
The complete question is :
Which of the following is an example of a lower tier, bureau-level agency, within a department?
A) Department of Justice
B) Department of Defense
C) National Park Service (within the U.S. Department of the Interior)
D) Central Intelligence Agency
learn more about bureau here
https://brainly.com/question/28041514
#SPJ4
the prosecutor is an attorney for the victim in a criminal proceeding?
No, the prosecutor is not an attorney for the victim in a criminal proceeding but a prosecutor is an attorney employed by the Government and prosecutes people accused of breaking the law.
Who is a prosecutor?A prosecutor is a legal representative of the prosecution in states with either the common law adversarial system or the civil law inquisitorial system. The prosecution is the legal party responsible for presenting the case in a criminal trial against an individual accused of breaking the law. Typically, the prosecutor represents the state or the government in the case brought against the accused person.
Prosecutors are typically lawyers who possess a law degree and are recognised as suitable legal professionals by the court in which they are acting.
Learn more about prosecutor, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12057544
#SPJ1
political spending by corporations is a form of protected speech under the first amendment. true or false
False, Under the first amendment, political spending by companies is a type of protected speech.
Congress is prohibited from passing laws that impede religious freedom or treat religion as an establishment by the First Amendment. It protects the freedoms of the press, of assembly, and of complaint-filing with the government. All citizens have the freedom to carry a weapon under the Second Amendment. The First Amendment safeguards the freedoms of religion, speech, assembly, and petitioning. It forbids Congress from favouring one religion over another or from placing limitations on a person's ability to practice their religion. Congress is prohibited from passing laws that impose a government establishment of religion, restrict free speech, the press, or the freedom of the people to freely assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.
Learn more about first amendment here
https://brainly.com/question/26448398
#SPJ4
which of the following makes a correct comparison between political parties and protest movements in the united states? choose 1 answer:
A comparison between political parties and protest movements in the United States is often made, but it is important to note that they are fundamentally different entities.
Political parties are established organizations with a set of core beliefs and a political agenda, whereas protest movements are more informal, often driven by grassroots activism and focused on a specific issue or cause. While both have the potential to influence and shape public policy, it is important to recognize that political parties have the institutional power to continue to exist and sustain their influence, whereas protest movements are fleeting, often dissipating as soon as their goals are achieved.While political parties focus on gaining power through elections and influencing policy through the legislative process, protest movements rely on collective action and civil disobedience as a means of social reform. Additionally, political parties generally have strong organizational structures, while protest movements often have loose, decentralized structures. Ultimately, both political parties and protest movements are necessary for a healthy democracy and the preservation of civil rights.
Learn more about political parties here
https://brainly.com/question/12401053
#SPJ4
true/false. a group of national socialist party sympathizers decides to have its annual protest march in a city with a heavily jewish population. concerned about the marchers inciting violence, the city council members vote to change the permitting requirements for marches in their city, making the march more expensive compared with other similar events
The decision made by council is absolutely right because from the perspective of law and order maintenance in the city its crucial for the people to follow necessary steps so that peace of the city remains undisturbed.
The annual protest march of national socialist party sympathizers is not cancelled but few of its permissions is taken away from the perspective of law maintenance in the city, as in the city heavily populated with Jewish, this march could have lead to violence and social unrest in the city.
The complete question is -
A group of national socialist party sympathizers decides to have its annual protest march in a city with a heavily Jewish population. concerned about the marchers inciting violence, the city council members vote to change the permitting requirements for marches in their city, making the march more expensive compared with other similar events. The decision made by Council is right or wrong?
To know more about law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ4
what should you do if you need to turn left at a flashing yellow traffic signal?
which constitutional amendment related to the court system are important to understand for someone working in the field of criminal justice?
The sixth constitutional amendment related to the court system are important to understand for someone working in the field of criminal justice. The sixth constitutional amendment states that the accused shall get the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district.
What is amendment?An amendment is a change or modification or an addition to the terms of a contract, law, government regulatory filing, or other documents. An amendment in the constitution of a country is known as constitutional amendment.
There is proper procedure is followed in the legislature and by proper voting and passing of the bills the amendments are made in the constitution or in any laws of the government.
The sixth constitutional amendment states that the accused shall get the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district.
Learn more about the amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/29372567
#SPJ1
T/F a key defining characteristic that distinguishes autocracies from democracies is that democracies hold elections, whereas autocracies do not.
The given statement about key defining characteristics of autocracies and democracies is False
Elections themselves don't necessarily distinguish between democracies and autocracies. Elections are frequently held in autocracies, although they are typically not free and fair in the same sense as those held in democracies. An autocracies is a form of governance in which one person holds unlimited authority over the entire country, with no checks or balances from the public or established legal systems on their actions. Democracies is a system of government in which the populace has the power to decide on legislation and elect representatives to carry it out.
To learn more about autocracies click here
brainly.com/question/26519649
#SPJ4
one weakness of the articles of confederation was that it lacked which 2 branches of government?
a. Judical & Legislative
b. Excutive & Judical
c. Excutive & Oak 345
d. Legislative & Executive
The correct response is b. executive & judicial branch. Under the Articles, there was no executive or judicial arm of government. The national government established by the Articles of Confederation is made up of representatives picked by state governments.
A federal law's constitutionality and other legal disputes are decided by the judicial branch. Nevertheless, the enforcement of court rulings rests with our government's executive branch. The truth about what occurred and what has to be done about it are decided by the courts. The court of last resort for individuals seeking justice is the highest court in the land, to start with. Second, it plays a crucial part in ensuring that each arm of government understands the boundaries of its own authority because of its ability to conduct judicial reviews. The Secretary of Justice, members of Congress, and an ex-officio member of the Integrated Bar, a professor of law, make up the group in addition to the Chief Justice, who serves as the group's ex-officio chairman.
Learn more about judicial branch here
https://brainly.com/question/141524
#SPJ4
which of the following are listed as formal duties of the vice president in the constitution?(1 point)
The Vice President is officially tasked with three tasks: presiding over the Senate, overseeing the presidential succession, and determining the president's infirmity.
It was not until the very end of the Constitutional Convention that the vice presidency was formed. Only a few states even had lieutenant governors when the Constitution's Framers were considering backup plans in case something unexpected happened.
Duties are:
The vice president is given the title "president of the Senate" by Article I Section 3 Clause 4 of the Constitution, although he is only allowed to cast a vote if the Senate is "equally split."The vice president must have a heartbeat in accordance with Article II Section 1 Clause 6, which reads, "In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President,The Twenty-fifth Amendment added a third statutory responsibility for the vice president. The president's eligibility to serve as president must be determined by him and the Cabinet members.To know more about Constitution, refer to this link:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ4
Which of the following provide guidance for users trying to understand unique governmental reporting issues?
A GASB Interpretations
B FASB Statements
C GASB Concepts Statements
D AICPA Audit Guides
The correct option is (C) which is GASB concept statements.
The United States state and local governments employ generally accepted accounting rules that were developed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. It is a private, non-governmental organization, like the majority of the organizations that contribute to the development of GAAP in the US.
The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), an independent, private organization with headquarters in Norwalk, Connecticut, was founded in 1984. It sets accounting and financial reporting standards for local and state governments in the United States that adhere to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
The GASB has released or will release several Concepts Statements. The purpose of concept statements is to offer a conceptual framework of interconnected goals and essential ideas that can serve as a foundation for setting uniform accounting and financial reporting standards.
To learn more about GASB, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29735977
#SPJ4
true/false. fines and jail time (occasionally) for information security failures are: generally, only applied for serious, deliberate misuse, where someone intentionally accesses data in order to do harm or for personal gain. generally, only applicable when a person or organization violates federal laws. generally, very small in quantity and almost never applied. generally, only applicable when a person or organization violates state laws.
False. Fines and jail time (occasionally) for information security failures are generally only applied for serious, deliberate misuse, where someone intentionally accesses data in order to do harm or for personal gain.
Generally, fines and jail time are applicable when a person or organization violates federal or state laws. However, these penalties are usually very small in quantity and almost never applied. Information security failures that result in fines and jail time are usually only seen in cases of serious, deliberate misuse. This includes when someone deliberately accesses data with the intent to cause harm or for personal gain. In such cases, criminal penalties are typically applied to hold those responsible accountable for their actions. These penalties can range from hefty fines to imprisonment depending on the severity of the offense. The penalties for committing an offense can be severe. Depending on the severity of the offense, they can range from hefty fines to imprisonment.
Learn more about information security here
https://brainly.com/question/6019784
#SPJ4
ich e6 describes standards that apply to: research sponsors only investigators only investigators, sponsors, and irbs irbs only
The ICH E6 GCP defines standards for investigators, sponsors, and IRBs. Following the ICH E6 GCP in the United States is: FDA-regulated drug studies are conducted on a voluntary basis.
The goal of this ICH GCP guidance is to provide a unified standard for the European Union, Japan, and the United States in order to facilitate mutual acceptance of clinical data by these regulatory authorities.
The IRB/IEC should protect all trial subjects' rights, safety, and well-being. with the proper administration of the investigational product(s), as described in the protocol, the current Investigator's Brochure, the product information, and other information sources provided by the sponsor.
An inspection is defined as the act by a regulatory authority of conducting an official review of documents, facilities, records, and any other resources related to a clinical trial, according to ICH E6.
Learn more about regulatory authority from here;
https://brainly.com/question/27777715
#SPJ4
Garden Tool Company makes chain saws. Hadrian is injured while using a Garden Tool saw and sues the company for product liability based on negligence. To win, Hadrian must show that
A. Garden tool used puffery in its advertising
B. Garden tool did not use due care with respect to the trimmer
C. Hadrian was not experienced in the use of trimmers
D. Hadrian was in probity with garden tool
Hadrian must show that Garden Tool didn't use due care with respect to the chain saw in order to win the product liability action grounded on negligence and Garden tool used puffery in its advertising so option A is correct .
This means that Hadrian must show substantiation that Garden Tool was apprehensive of, or should have been apprehensive of, the implicit troubles of a chain saw and didn't take reasonable way to help injury. This could include substantiation that Garden Tool didn't give acceptable warnings or instructions, or that the chain saw had a design or manufacturing disfigurement that made it more likely to beget injury.
Hadrian will also need to prove that he wasn't careless in using the chain saw and that he wasn't endured in its use. He should also be suitable to prove that he was in probity with Garden Tool, meaning that he wasn't in any way responsible for his own injury.
To know more about Garden Tool visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15332393?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
based on the excerpt above, which of the following statements would kennedy have most likely agreed with in terms of both the ideals of, and challenges for, the us republic?
"No content limitations should be imposed on any media sites or corporations, " Kennedy would probably concur.
You can generally disable or restrict access to particular programs and services on your child's mobile device using Screen Time's Content and Privacy Restrictions. You can restrict settings for mature content, purchases and downloads, and privacy on your iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch. Change the Content and Privacy Restrictions settings. Tap it. Parental controls. Put parental controls in place. You can protect the parental controls by creating a personal identification number (PIN) that your child does not know. "No content limits should be enforced on any media sites or companies, as total press freedom will eventually address any abuses," is a statement that Kennedy would probably concur with.
Learn more about Kennedy here:
https://brainly.com/question/29910593
#SPJ4
rich and poor according to a rational-material explanation, the 2013 government shutdown was mainly aconflict between .the rich and the poor conservatives and liberals republicans and democrats the legislative and executive branches
The 2013 government shutdown was mostly a battle between republicans and democrats, a rational-material explanation claim.
The Democratic-Republicans were a political party in the US. Democratic-Republicans upheld a strict interpretation of the US Constitution and favored a compact federal structure with the preponderance of authority resting with state governments. They backed a thriving agrarian economy and opposed the Federalist objectives of industrialization and a national bank. According to a rational-material account, the 2013 government shutdown was essentially a conflict between the Republicans and the Democrats. The Affordable Care Act and the budget were the two main problems that caused the shutdown, with Republicans in the House of Representatives pushing for changes to the program while Democrats in the Senate and the White House refused to negotiate.
Learn more about Battle between republicans and democrats here:
https://brainly.com/question/30359155
#SPJ4
If research could show that the tendency to commit crime is inherited, what should be done with young children of violent prone criminals?
Hooke's law describes the force of _____.
Hooke's law describes the force of a spring. It states that the force (F) applied to a spring is equal to the negative of the spring's stiffness (k) multiplied by the displacement (x) of the spring from its equilibrium position: F = -kx.
Hooke's law describes the force of a spring. It states that the force (F) applied to a spring is a result of the spring's stiffness (k) and the displacement (x) of the spring from its equilibrium position. The force is proportional to the displacement, and can be expressed as F = -kx, where k is the stiffness of the spring and x is the displacement from equilibrium.
Hooke's law describes the force of a spring. It states that the force (F) applied to a spring is equal to the negative of the spring's stiffness (k) multiplied by the displacement (x) of the spring from its equilibrium position: F = -kx.
learn more about law here
https://brainly.com/question/13242861
#SPJ4
FILL THE BLANK remedies ___ involve specific performance.
Part of the common law tradition relies on the doctrine of ____
The Latin phrase for the correct answer in the previous question means ____
One of the important functions of law is to provide ___
Remedies that call for a certain action. The theory of specific performance is a component of the common law system. To accomplish a certain thing is what the Latin expression for the right response to the prior inquiry signifies. The provision of remedies is one of the law's key roles.
Specific performance is a legal remedy that requires a party to fulfill their contractual obligations, as opposed to monetary damages. It is typically used in situations where the subject matter of the contract is unique and cannot be replaced, such as the sale of a specific piece of real estate or a one-of-a-kind item.
The doctrine of specific performance is a principle of common law, which is a legal system based on court decisions and customs rather than written laws. Common law is used in many countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada.
To learn more about doctrine
https://brainly.com/question/29761981
#SPJ4
remedies granted by way of exception involve specific performance.
Part of the common law tradition relies on the doctrine of custom and precedent.
The Latin phrase for the correct answer in the previous question means confidential Writer.
One of the important functions of law is to provide international peace and security and political stability
In contrast to monetary damages, specific performance is a type of legal remedy that calls on a party to carry out their contractual commitments. It is frequently applied in circumstances when the contract's subject matter is distinct and irreplaceable, such as when selling a particular piece of real estate or a one-of-a-kind object.
A common law theory, or legal system founded on court judgements and conventions rather than written laws, is the idea of particular performance. Many nations, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada, employ common law.
For more questions about common law tradition
https://brainly.com/question/393654
#SPJ4
identify three to five examples of how the specific rights given to citizens in the eighth amendment might potentially restrict the actions of professionals in the criminal justice system.
The eighth amendment States no excess bail, nor excessive fines are imposed, and cruel and unusual punishment is not implemented. The death penalty also will be removed from this amendment which is considered cruel.
It prevents the government from imposing death penalties and punishments on criminal defendants, an example of civil rights that may not be guaranteed in this amendment is the death penalty some states allow, and some states don't allow the penalty of death. Professionals,
It'll restrict the actions of professionals in the criminal justice system as excessive fines and cruel punishments. The amendment can help the people from those.
Therefore, the cruel punishments received by the criminals will be reduced and penalties will be imposed, and they need to pay them a little less severe punishments will be imposed concern to the crime they do.
To know more about eighth amendment
brainly.com/question/1321514
#SPJ4
A woman whose child attended a charter school learned that the children of the woman's neighbor who attended a parochial school received a hot lunch paid for, in part, through federal expenditures enacted under Congress's spending power. The charter school received no funding from the federal government. The woman challenged this federal expenditure as a violation of the Establishment Clause.
For her to bring the suit, at the very least what must the woman allege?
The woman must claim that the federal funding given to the Catholic school is being used to advance or promote religion in violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
In order to file a lawsuit challenging the federal expenditure as a breach of the Establishment Clause.
She must also claim that the funding has caused her particular harm, such as depriving her kid of an equal opportunity to receive an education or subsidizing religious institutions with her own tax money.
She must also have standing to file the lawsuit, which indicates that she has a personal stake in the result and that the court can compensate her for her harm.
To learn more about Establishment Clause,
https://brainly.com/question/29618695
#SPJ4