What is the equation that represents this pattern

Thanks

Answer:

y = x + 9/4     or     y = x + 2 1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

y - 4x = 9

y - x = 9/4 (divide both sides by 4)

y = x + 9/4 (Add x to both sides)

Answer:

The below is the answer to the equation. 4.5, 0

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

umm

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

You don't measure cereal in the others because feet, meters and millimeters are too big. Hope this helps.

Answer: x > - 18

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

carios has greater angle

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps

Answer:

45

Step-by-step explanation:

4.50 × 10 =45!

.

.

.

.

.

.?

.

.

.

.

.

Answer:

$15

Step-by-step explanation:

$4.50 time 3 = $13.50 (9 lbs)

$4.50 divided by 3 = $1.50 (1 lb)

$1.50 plus $13.50 = $15

Answer:

[tex]\mathrm{No\: solutions}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Since Connor has worked 12 hours walking dogs, he's earned [tex]12\cdot 8 = \$96[/tex] from walking dogs. He still needs to earn [tex]\$160-\$96=\$64[/tex]. As stated in the problem, he makes $12 an hour landscaping, therefore the minimum number of whole hours he must work to fulfill his requirements is [tex]\lceil{ \frac{64}{12} \rceil = 6\: \mathrm{hours}[/tex]. However, the problem states he can only work a maximum of 15 hours. He would have to work [tex]12+6=18[/tex] to fulfill his requirements and therefore he will not be able to meet his requirements with the restrictions given.

Answer:

There is not enough information to say they are congruent

Step-by-step explanation:

To prove two triangles are congruent, you need 3 things, which you can see through the list of options you were given. But since we only have two, there isn't enough information to prove the are congruent.

Answer:

C. 52.4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-30n + 42

Step-by-step explanation:

6( -5n + 7)

-30n + 42

Hope this helps!

Answer:

939/x    8.38/100

x8.38     93900

x= 11205.25

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The correct answer is,

[tex] {8x}^{6y {}^{5} } [/tex]

Answer:

8 is the number

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't know why it took me so long to figure it out, 4 x 8 = 32 32 + 15 = 47

It probably took me a really long time because I am tired, and I am not using a calculator.

Answer:

brand name and model - - > CATEGORICAL

whether it has a top freezer, bottom freezer, or side-by-side LAYOUT - - > CATEGORICAL

the estimated energy consumption per year (kilowatts); - - - > QUANTITATIVE

whether or not it is Energy Star COMPLIANT - - > CAREGORICAL

the width, depth, and height in INCHES - - - > QUANTITATIVE

both the freezer and refrigerator net capacity, in cubic FEET - - - > QUANTITATIVE

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the following refrigerator characteristics :

brand name and model - - > CATEGORICAL

whether it has a top freezer, bottom freezer, or side-by-side LAYOUT - - > CATEGORICAL

the estimated energy consumption per year (kilowatts); - - - > QUANTITATIVE

whether or not it is Energy Star COMPLIANT - - > CAREGORICAL

the width, depth, and height in INCHES - - - > QUANTITATIVE

both the freezer and refrigerator net capacity, in cubic FEET - - - > QUANTITATIVE

To start with ; Categorical and quantitative variables differ most notably in the fact that, quantitative variables deals with numbers, measurements or calculated mathematical values of certain attribute in a measured species or sample. Categorical variable on the other hand mostly deals with making distinctions in properties of a sample by grouping the varibale into the different available categories based on their attributes.

Answer:

w is 4.8 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

-perimeter is 15.8 m so all the sides of the rectangle adds up to 15.8.

- a rectangle has 2 sets of equal sides.

-first, do 3.1 times 2 to get the length of the first set of equal sides. This equals to 6.2.

-now 15.8 - 6.2 = 9.6 meters

- 9.6 divided by 2 to find the width, as well as the measurements of the second set of equal sides.

the width, w, is 4.8 meters.

The equation that represents the age of the youngest sister is 4x + 12 = 36. Then the age of youngest sister will be 6 years old.

The analysis of mathematical representations is algebra, and the handling of those symbols is logic.

The four sisters are all 2 years apart in age. The total of their ages is equal to 36 years.

Let x be the age of the youngest sister. Then the age of other sister will be x + 2, x + 4, and x + 6. Then the equation is given as,

x + x + 2 + x + 4 + x + 6 = 36

4x + 12 = 36

4x = 36 - 12

4x = 24

x = 24 / 4

x = 6

The equation that represents the age of the youngest sister is 4x + 12 = 36. Then the age of youngest sister will be 6 years old.

More about the Algebra link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/953809

#SPJ5

Answer:

quadrant 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

perimeter: 2(l+b) , area : multiply by breadth

Step-by-step explanation:

perimeter: 2(10.5+5.5)

               :206.5m ans

area: 10.5multiply bye 5.5

      :57.75m ans

2: perimeter: 2(15+6.8)

                   : 36.8cm ans

area : 15 multiply by 6.8

        : 102cm ans  

Answer:

approx. 6.523809523809524 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us first find how long it takes Jane to drive 1 mile.

11/693 = approx. 0.015873015873016 hours to drive one mile.

She drives 411 miles, so we can multiply that by 411:

0.015873015873016 * 411 = approx. 6.523809523809524 hours

I hope this helps! :)

Answer:

6.52 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

693 miles divided by 11 hours = 63 miles per hour.

411 miles divided by 63 miles = 6.52380952 miles

Round to 2 decimal places: 6.52 hours

Answer/Step-by-step explanation:

First, find the slope (m) of Line L using the points (0, 5) and (2, 1):

[tex] slope (m) = \frac{y_2 - y_1}{x_2 - x_1} = \frac{1 - 5}{2 - 0} = \frac{-4}{2} = -2 [/tex]

Slope (m) = -2

✔️Since the line is parallel bro Line L, it would also have the same slope value of -2.

We can use the slope (m) and a point (a, b) of the line to find its equation using the point-slope formula, y - b = m(x - a).

Substitute (a, b) = (3, 0), and m = -2 into y - b = m(x + a):

Thus,

✅y - 0 = -2(x + 3)

Rewrite equation in slope-intercept form

y = -2(x + 3)

✅y = -2x - 6

Answer: $825 (B)

Step-by-step explanation:

it’s obvious

Answer: The answer is B!

Step-by-step explanation: It's on edge, hope this helped!

Answer: the answer is 7°

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4 4/9

Step-by-step explanation:

Move all terms not containing x

to the right side of the equation.

Exact Form:

x=−409

Decimal Form:x=−4.¯4

Mixed Number Form:

4 4/9

Answer:

-39

Step-by-step explanation:

x-6/9 = -5

then multiply both sides by 9

9  ° (x-6) / 9  = 9 ° -5

simplify

x-6= -45

add 6 to both sides

x-6+6=-45+6

simplify

x= -39

Answer:

Total Proper Subsets = 2ⁿ - 1 = 2³ -1 =8-1 =7

Step-by-step explanation:

Basically the formula for,

No of subsets = 2ⁿ

Where n is number of elements in a set. As one subset is improper which is equal to the set itself so we have to find proper subsets which are = 2ⁿ - 1.

Answer:

a) The z-score for a backyard structure costing $2300 is -0.57.

b) The z-score for a backyard structure costing $4900 is 1.29

c) A backyard structure costing $2300 costs 0.57 standard deviations below the mean, while a backyard structure costing $4900 costs 1.29 standard deviations above the mean. Since both are within 2 standard deviations of the mean, none is an outlier.

d) Since this combination costs more than 2 standard deviations from the mean, yes, it should be considered an outlier.

Step-by-step explanation:

Z-score:

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

If the z-score is more than two standard deviations from the mean(lesser than -2 or more than 2), the score X is considered an outlier.

In this question, we have that:

[tex]\mu = 3100, \sigma = 1400[/tex]

a. What is the z-score for a backyard structure costing $2300?

We have to find Z when [tex]X = 2300[/tex]. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{2300 - 3100}{1400}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -0.57[/tex]

The z-score for a backyard structure costing $2300 is -0.57.

b. What is the z-score for a backyard structure costing $4900?

We have to find Z when [tex]X = 2300[/tex]. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{4900 - 3100}{1400}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.29[/tex]

The z-score for a backyard structure costing $4900 is 1.29

c. Interpret the z-scores in parts (a) and (b). Comment on whether either should be considered an outlier.

A backyard structure costing $2300 costs 0.57 standard deviations below the mean, while a backyard structure costing $4900 costs 1.29 standard deviations above the mean. Since both are within 2 standard deviations of the mean, none is an outlier.

d. If the cost for a backyard shed-office combination built in Albany, California, is $13,000, should this structure be considered an outlier?

We have to find the z-score when X = 13000. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{13000 - 3100}{1400}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 7.07[/tex]

Since this combination costs more than 2 standard deviations from the mean, yes, it should be considered an outlier.

Answer:

x = 91/11

Step-by-step explanation:

1. x - 3/11 = 8

2. add 3/11 to both sides of the equation

3. x = 91/11