Answer:
People strive to make decisions they hope will bene- fit them in the future.
Explanation:
hope this helps! Please brainiest
Answer:
It means that when you do something good or bad it will always come back to you. This is the law of karma. An example of the Law of Karma is that if you do something nice to someone then something good will come back to you but if you do ugly to people than bad things will happen to you.
Explanation:
Define opening statement
Answer:
An opening statement is generally the first occasion that the trier of fact has to hear from a lawyer in a trial, aside possibly from questioning during voir dire. The opening statement is generally constructed to serve as a "road map" for the fact-finder.
Explanation:
what incentives influence people in their decisions about exercise and diet?
Answer:
The incentives that influence decisions about exer- cise include forms of passive entertainment, like tele- vision and computer games. One incentive influenc- ing decisions about diet is the reduced cost of food.)
Explanation:
What would be "justice" to you and why?
Answer:
Justice is a concept of moral rightness based on ethics, rationality, law, natural law, religion, or equity. It is also the act of being just and/or fair.
Explanation:
what is the voluntary trade?
Answer:
it's when the act of buyers and sellers freely and willingly exchanging in Market transactions
Explanation:
!
21. All bills start in a committee, but the ideas for them can begin elsewhere. Ideas for laws can
start in all of these places EXCEPT: *
NEEDED FOR A TEST ASAP
a.With the president
b.With foreign leaders
c.With regular US citizens
d.With members of Congress
Answer:
C. :)
Explanation:
Answer:
b. With foreign leaders
Explanation:
Ideas for laws that CAN start in all of these places:
c. With regular US citizens ⇒ You and I can come up with ideas for laws. In fact, most of the ideas for laws come from just regular US citizens.
d. With members of Congress ⇒ Within Congress, representatives can come up with ideas for laws to help benefit the country. Members of the House of Representatives and the Senate can both do that.
a. With the president ⇒ The president comes up with laws because he’s the one responsible for our country. So the president does still come up with ideas for laws to help with our country. But it’s not like the president gets to come up with anything he wants to and he can just sign the bill and it becomes a law. Every idea for a law always goes to Congress where the members decide if it’s good or not, including the president’s ideas.
Ideas for laws that CANNOT start in this place (the correct answer):
b. With foreign leaders ⇒ Foreign leaders are leaders that are outside of our country. That’s what foreign means: overseas, distant, away, etc. Foreign leaders can’t come with ideas for laws because there not even in/part of our country.
In case you still don’t understand:
Example: Let’s say there is a King in England (there isn’t a king in England but this is just an example). Now, does the King of England get to come up with ideas for laws for our country? Absolutly not! He’s totally from a different country, and he doesn’t have the right to be in America’s business in making laws. He deals with his own country, not ours.
Hence,
Ideas for laws can start in all of these places EXCEPT:
b. With foreign leaders
Hope this helps! :D
Select the correct answer.
Who are the authors of the social disorganization theory?
O A.
Marcus Felson and Lawrence Cohen
OB.
Cesare Lombroso and Enrico Ferri
O C.
Cesare Beccaria and Bentham
OD
Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay
Reset
Answer:
Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay
Explanation:
This is correct, I hope it helps! :)
The statement below is from a jury's decision in a court case.
"We, the jury, rule in favor of Mrs. Garcia, and order Mr. Wakefield to pay the sum of twenty thousand dollars, plus attorney fees and court costs.."
Based on the statement above, what type of case has the jury decided?
A. civil
B. criminal
C. military
D. statutory
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
The kind of case that the jury has decided would be:
A). Civil
What are the types of cases?The courts deal with a number of cases which include:
Civil CasesFamily CasesCriminal casesAs per the details provided, the given case would be characterized as a Civil Case as it is concerned with the conflicts that exist between Mrs. Garcia and Mr. Wakefield.
The decision of the court would aim to resolve this and hence, it exemplifies a civil case.
Thus, option A is the correct answer.
Learn more about "Jury" here:
brainly.com/question/20407684
Hello I need some help on this question because I’m overthinking that if it’s A,B,C my top three choices so please help me out on this one.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Because you should be patient
why are the rules of the economic system important?
1) a situation in which human wants are greater than the capacity of available resources to provide for those wants
2)a situation in which a resource has more than one valuable use
What are strengths and weaknesses for social structure?
this is the cartoon from my previous question
Answer:
sick cartoon lol
Explanation:
Which of the following is a term for a society in which all members have
meaningful rights and opportunities to express opinions and participate in
decision-making processes?
A. Democratic society
B. Monarchical society
C. Dictatorial society
D. Aristocratic society
Answer:
A democarcy is the people for the people by the people
Explanation:
Mark was a new salesperson in an electronics store. He sold a TV to a customer and accidentally gave a 35% discount. His manager told him to be careful next time, but did not contact the customer to correct the sale. Then next day, a friend of the original customer came in and wanted to buy the same TV with the same 35% discount.
Should the second customer be allowed to receive the same discount?
Answer: Yes
Explanation:
The second customer should be allowed the same discount due to the precedent set by the introduction of an agency by ratification.
An Agency by ratification refers to when a principal ratifies the actions of an agent that acted without permission. The principal would then become bound to the action that was performed.
Mark was the agent and when the manager(principal) did not contact the customer to correct the sale, the manager ratified the actions of Mark and so is bound to the discount which means it should be extended to the customer's friend as well.
Describe how the Due process clause of the 14th amendment affects the guarantees in the Bill of Rights
Answer:
before the government may deprive someone of “life, liberty, or property.” In other words, the Clause does not prohibit the government from depriving someone of “substantive” rights such as life, liberty, or property; it simply requires that the government follow ...
Wilona was married to Wilbur for 40 years. She was devastated when he passed away. She had been very reliant on him and left all their business matters to him. She had always been a religious person and turned to her faith for solace.
She was visited by her local priest, Father Devout. She talked about her situation with him and concluded that she should sell her matrimonial home and move into a small unit. Father Devout was himself looking for a new home after the church had informed him that it would be selling the bungalow adjacent to the church building in which he currently lived as a cost- cutting exercise. He mentioned this fact in passing and Wilona insisted that she sell her house to him. When he asked how much she would want for the property, she said she had no idea of its worth. However, she had heard a neighbour say that a house in the street had sold for about $200,000, but, because she knew that her house would go to someone deserving, she would sell it to him for $100,000. This was in fact half its true value. She wouldn’t take no for an answer and Father Devout knew her to be someone who would obstinately insist on something once her mind was made up.
Wilona needed a bridging loan to purchase her unit. She does not trust banks and instead approached Sly, a fellow parishioner. Sly was a wealthy businessman, who told her he would give her the necessary funds if she signed a receipt for it so he ‘would have something to show the taxman’. In fact, the “receipt” was a basically-worded loan document, which provided that she was liable for interest at twice the rate that she could have obtained from a bank. Wilona signed the document without reading it because she thought Sly, as a fellow churchgoer, was “a good man”.
Wilona’s son and daughter have just flown in from their respective homes overseas and discovered what Wilona has been doing. They seek your advice on whether she can undo what she has done.
Advise Wilona’s children, discussing all available grounds for relief under Australian contract law.
Answer:whats the question
Explanation:
Answer:
A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).
In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.
Explanation:
A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).
In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.
The City of Sunshine is in the process of bringing a hockey team to the area and will need land on which to build a new arena. The site has been selected and Sunshine officials have offered the homeowners a fair amount for the property where the arena is to be built. What would this action fall under?
Answer:
This action would fall under the Fifth Amendment's eminent domain.
Explanation:
Eminent domain is the legal term used to denote the deprivation of ownership of an immovable or movable property by the state, within the framework of the law and against compensation. An overriding purpose serving the common good is cited as the justification for expropriations for traffic, military and other reasons related to state tasks.
Since property is one of the basic rights in market-based democracies, expropriations are only possible there in certain legally regulated exceptional cases. Thus, in America this is reflected in the Fifth Amendment, which establishes that property can only be expropriated for public use and with due compensation.