Answer:What are the pros and cons of separating CEO and chairman?
The positives of separating the chairman and CEO roles are appealing. The board is directly responsible for the hiring and firing of the CEO, and is charged with general oversight of the corporation’s affairs and its management.
Explanation:
By the time of the 1828 presidential election, a new ______ had begun to emerge out of the divisions within the Republican Party.
Based on historical perspective, by the time of the 1828 presidential election, a new Two-party system had begun to emerge out of the divisions within the Republican Party.
This is because, during the 1828 presidential election, one of the major parties was the Democratic-Republican party which split into two-party systems.
The two major parties the Democratic-Republic split into are the modern-day Democratic Party and the Whig Party.
The Whig party would later break into factions, forming alliances to become the present-day Republican Party.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is a "Two-party system."
Learn more about the Two-Party system here: https://brainly.com/question/18682200
the act of separating from a nation or state and becoming independent
Answer:
Secession
Explanation:
The act of separating from a nation or state and becoming independent is called secession.
How did William Jennings Bryan's politics most reflect Populist policies?
A. He fought to tighten immigration limits.
B. He supported the direct election of senators.
C. He advocated strongly for bimetallism.
D. He opposed government support for farmers.
Answer:
D. He opposed government support for farmers.
Explanation:
The election of 1896 was just as much a partisan battle over the future of American economic policy as the 2012 election. On this day in 1896, William Jennings Bryan delivered his rousing speech as a delegate to the Democratic convention declaring that mankind would not be “crucified on a cross of gold.” In the speech, Bryan, who was from the western farming state of Nebraska, advocated the inclusion of a silver standard for U.S. currency, which rallied the populist base of the Democratic Party and helped Bryan win the nomination for the presidency.
To take a step back in history, the source of the issue began with the Gold Rush in 1849, which altered the bi-metallism status quo. For decades, both gold and silver backed U.S. currency and both silver and gold species could be turned into a Sub-Treasury Mint for dollars. The government valued silver at a ratio of 16:1 to gold in ounces. With the flood of gold to the market following the Gold Rush, people could sell their silver privately and to foreign markets at a lower ratio, thus making more money. However, when silver was discovered in Nevada in the 1860s, the ratio of silver to gold sold privately or abroad increased, but the government continued to offer the 16:1 ratio. In short, the government policy increased currency circulation, benefitting westerners, rural farmers, and the poor who could more easily pay off debts or make purchases. Meanwhile, Wall Street and banks in the East mobilized against the government’s policy because they would not receive as much profit on loans to farmers and the poor.
However, by 1873, the flood of silver into government coffers created an economic crisis. Congress responded by passing the Coinage Act of 1873, which effectively ended bi-metallism by eliminating the silver dollar and by making gold the only metallic standard (though the U.S. did not accept the Gold Standard de jure until 1900). Western miners and farmers termed it the “Crime of 1873.” Their “Free Silver” movement became a core constituency of the Democratic Party, represented by William Jennings Bryan.
A clear partisan divide in the elections of 1896 and 1900 centered on the bi-metallism debate. Republican candidate William McKinley blamed the Democrats and their platform of bi-metallism for the Panic of 1893, while Republicans and Eastern banking interests called the gold standard “sound money” policy. One article of campaign propaganda is illustrative: McKinley’s campaign issued fake dollar bills that read “In God We Trust…for the Other 53 Cents” to argue that the dollar backed by silver would only be worth 47 cents. Another campaign poster linked the Republican Party’s gold coin as “sound money” policy to the beneficial aspects of the party’s protectionist policy compared to the detrimental impact of the Democratic Party’s free trade policy.
In the “Cross of Gold” speech, Bryan argued that the Democratic Party’s focus on bi-metallism in its platform was justified because a gold standard alone could not solve the country’s problems at the time, including debt, small business failure, and monopolies. According to Bryan, if silver was restored, “all other necessary reforms will be possible.” He compared the situation to fights over the national bank, arguing that “What we need is an Andrew Jackson to stand, as Jackson stood, against the encroachments of organized wealth.” In the speech, Bryan also connects the Democratic Party’s tradition since Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson against moneyed interests in favor of the little guy. Bryan favored a regulatory role for government in issuing money and called for banks to “go out of the governing business.”
The excerpt from the “Cross of Gold” speech below resounds with populist rhetoric, though the speech itself took the wind out of the Populist Party’s sails, rallying supporters to the Democratic Party. The excerpt also links the issue to the Democratic Party’s position on international trade.
Which religion is the religious minority group
adhering to?
(A)Confucianism
(b)Sikhism
(C)Hinduism
(D)Shintoism
Answer:
i think it's C - hinduism
Explanation:
Read the argument from an argumentative essay.
The Civil War did not need to happen. Countless lives were lost and government legislation could have resolved the issue of slavery, therefore, keeping the Union together.
Which statement best serves as a counterargument?
The Civil War was fought over the issue of whether a state could secede from the Union over the issue of slavery.
The Civil War was long and bloody, but it was necessary to keep the Union together.
The Civil War kept the Union together.
The Civil War was justified because states have the right to rule themselves.
Answer:
A. The Civil War was fought over the issue of whether a state could secede from the Union over the issue of slavery.
Explanation:
currently doing the test and it's a possible correct answer
The statement best serves as a counter argument is the Civil War was fought over the issue of whether a state could secede from the Union over the issue of slavery.
The Civil war began in 1861 and lasted up to 1865. The Civil War fought between the North and the South over the issue of slavery with keeping the South with the Union.For the southerners, the civil war was the issue of states' rights.The south wanted to secede from the Union as they believed the North interfere with their issue of slavery.Therefore we can conclude that the Civil War fought over the issue of slavery and whether a state could secede from the Union.
Thus option A. is the correct answer.
Learn more about "the Civil War" here:
brainly.com/question/16365506
The map above shows the water and land routes taken by the __________ on the Trail of Tears.
A.
Seminole
B.
Creek
C.
Cherokee
D.
Arapaho
Which sentence is the best description of the impact of European colonization on Native Americans?
A. Native Americans lost their lands to Europeans
B. British settlers absorbed Native Americans into colonial society.
C.British colonists adopted religious practices of Native Americans.
D. Native Americans protected Europeans from attacks.
Answer:
A. Native Americans lost their lands to Europeans
Who founded the Mali Empire?
Answer:
King Sundiata Keita
Explanation:
Brainliest Please!How did the French respond when the United States refuse to it they get owned my France
Answer:
Explanation:
The French demanded that the United States provide France with a low-interest loan, assume and pay American merchant claims against the French, and lastly pay a substantial bribe to Talleyrand. The U.S. envoys were shocked, and also skeptical that any concessions would bring about substantial changes in French policy.
why did abandoning the gold standard result in a decline in the value of the u.s. dollar?
Answer:
More currency was able to be printed thus reducing its value.
Explanation:
Answer:
The gold standard was abandoned due to its propensity for volatility, as well as the constraints it imposed on governments: by retaining a fixed exchange rate, governments were hamstrung in engaging in expansionary policies to, for example, reduce unemployment.
What is a mercenary?
-A solider hired to fight for another country
- a person hired to obtain supplies for an army.
-commander in charge of an entire force
- a general hired to train foreign troops.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
mercenary is a professional soldier hired to serve in a foreign army
Answer:
the answer is A
in your opinion, could the outcome of the case have been politically motivated? Explain.
Answer:
Dred and Harriet Scott had no political motivation to pursue freedom. No one questioned their legitimate right to their freedom based on extended residence in free areas. That uncertainty had been resolved with the Missouri Supreme Court's 1824 decision in Winny v. ... Louis Circuit Court; only one resulted in freedom
Explanation:
What personal qualities do you think made Washington a really good leader???
Answer:
Washington had several characteristics, long before he was a leader, that led naturally to his leadership style. He was known for his patience, drive, attention to detail, strong sense of responsibility, and firm moral conscience. All of these characteristics drew people to him and contributed to their trust in him.
Which of the following is the main cause of the various Boston
protests (e.g. Tea Party, etc...)??
Answer:
Taxation
Explanation:
The American colonists believed Britain was unfairly taxing them to pay for expenses incurred during the French and Indian War. They rebelled in protest for all the taxes.
Answer:
Taxation without representation
Explanation:
I got it right on my test with the same question
In general, how has the Vice Presidency changed from the 19th Century, to the 20th Century, and up to today?
The Vice Presidency has changed due to their greater involvement in
policy making.
Who is a Vice President?A Vice president is the second in command to the President and succeeds
him in the case of unforeseen circumstances such as ill health, death and
resignation.
In the past, the President was majorly involved in policy making but in
recent times the Vice President have been found to be actively involved
through offering advices and representing the President on some
occasions.
Read more about Vice President here https://brainly.com/question/156500
PLS HELP A.S.A.P WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!
The religions of the ancient Egyptians and the Aztecs both encouraged the
a teaching of cuneiform
b teaching of alphabets
c study of astronomy
d study of engineering
Charles Grandison Finney was a. The religious leader of the Second Great Awakening.b. The governor of Pennsylvania.c. A scientist.d. The leader of the Mormon Church.
Answer:
Charles Grandison Finney was an American Presbyterian minister. He did not really 'play' an important role, he just actively marketed, promoted and packaged revivals as revivals were a key part of the movement and attracted hundreds of converts to new Protestant denominations.
this is not mine its sanasubhani15 go add hem
Explanation:
please help asap asap asap
Answer:
Granicus.
Explanation:
Looking at the map, Granicus is the first on the line. You can also use the process of elimination, since the other locations are more in the middle / later in the line than Granicus.
Answer: B
Explanation:
From there he start his way
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
Answer:
the alphabet
Explanation:
Answer:
i fully agree with this extrordinary statement
What might have been the
consequences for ancient Egyptian farmers if one year the
Nile River flooded too much or not at all?
Answer: High floods could devastate settlements
Explanation:
two much water
Answer:
High floods could devastate settlements
Explanation:
How significant were the changes that the Industrial Revolution brought to the world?
explain your conclusion.
Answer:
Extremely significant
Explanation:
The industrial revolution revolutionized communication, travel and manufacturing etc. It changed the economics of the world transforming the economy from an agricultural one to an industrial one. It revolutionized travel with the steam train on railways, roads and canals
It revolutionized communication with the telegraph.
It revolutionized manufacturing with the spinning jenny and other automatic systems. In agricultural times things would be built by hand whereas the industrial revolution the spinning jenny was hand powered.
1. Why did people originally start living together on the Mesopotamian plains?
They had to work together to provide enough water to make crops successful.
They enjoyed each other's company.
The had to protect each other from invaders.
They produced so much food that they needed extra help to harvest it all.
Answer:
They had to work together to provide enough water to make crops successful
Explanation:
I did the quiz, too. This was the answer I chose and it's correct
i can do all things with christ who strengthens me
Answer:
phillipians 4:13
Explanation:
explain how the geography impacts the economic + political development of ancient greece.
Answer:
Greece's geography impacted social, political, and economic patterns in a variety of ways, such as that its mountains prevented complete unification, led to the establishment of the city states near the sea, led to a reliance on naval powers, hindered overland trade, and encouraged maritime trade around the ...Explanation:
Arrange these events from the history of cartography in the order in which
they occurred.
1 The travels of Marco Polo
Mercator projection
1 Robinson projection
. Ibn Idrisi's world map
Answer:
Idrisi's world map 1154
Marco Polo's travels to Asia (1271–95)
Mercator projection 1569
Robinson projection 1963
How did the Treaty of Versailles, which ended World War I, help lead to the start of World War II?
Question 1 options:
The treaty led to the rise of Adolf Hitler in Germany due to resentment and economic hardships within the country
The treaty did not lead to World War II
The treaty led to the Great Depression, causing economic hardships across the globe.
The treaty blamed England for the start of World War I and caused tensions between countries in Europe.
Answer:
The treaty led to the rise of Adolf Hitler in Germany due to resentment and economic hardships within the country
Explanation:
I took the test! Hope this helps :)
Question 6 (5 points)
When did the written tradition become important in West Africa?
a
b
when the use of paper became widespread
after Christianity spread to West Africa
when more people learned to write
after Islam spread to West Africa
с
OO
d
Answer: B
Explanation:
After Islam spread into West Africa, the written traditions of the West Africans became far, more important. Muslims wrote many different works and writing and so many of them were preserved, most of them in schools. Many stories have now been turned into novels.
I need some help! 50 POINTS WILL MARK BRAINIEST!
why did the first triumvirate terrify the Roman Senate?
Answer:
Why was the 1st triumvirate formed?
It could be argued that the formation of the first triumvirate was the result of the marginalisation of an enemy (Caesar) and an outsider (Pompey) and the rebuttal of interests associated with Crassus by the optimates who held sway in the senate.
Explanation:
dont know why they terrifyed him
What does this quote by Napoleon—"I no longer considered myself a mere general, but a man called upon to decide the fate of peoples" (Paragraph 6)—reveal about his character? Cite evidence from the text to support your answer.
Use Napoleon Bonaparte commonlit article.
Answer:
Explanation:
He had an extraordinary sense of grandeur and believed himself to be much more than a mere mortal, thinking of himself as something of a god on earth. This is seen in the sentence where he claims himself to not just be a general, but rather someone that decides the fates, as if he has such grand power to decide the fate of not just a single person, but rather of "peoples
i hope this really helps you!
How many people were in Napoleon's army he used to invade Russia?
A - 500,000
B - 600,00
C - 1,000,000
D - 675,000
Answer:
Napoleon's army had entered Russia in 1812 with more than 600,000 men, 180,000 horses and 1,300 pieces of artillery.
Explanation:
HENCE, THE ANSWER IS LETTER B.600,000
Answer:
A - 500,000
Explanation:
On June 24, Napoleon ordered his Grande Armée, the largest European military force ever assembled to that date, into Russia. The enormous army featured more than 500,000 soldiers and staff and included contingents from Prussia, Austria, and other countries under the sway of the French empire.