What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.
Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.
Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.
Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.
Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.
Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.
Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.
Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.
Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.
Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.
Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.
Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.
Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.
Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.
Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.
Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.
Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.
Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.
Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.
Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.
Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.
Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.
Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.
Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.
Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
At the time of the Scopes trial, Americans were divided about the issue of teaching Darwin’s theories. Explain these diverse views.
The Scopes Trial, also known as the Scopes Monkey Trial, took place from July 10 to 21, 1925, in Dayton, Tennessee, in the United States. John T. Scopes, a high school teacher there, was accused of breaking the law by promoting Charles Darwin's theory of evolution.
What is Scopes Trial?
The Scopes Trial, also known as the Scopes Monkey Trial, took place from July 10 to 21, 1925, in Dayton, Tennessee, in the United States. John T. Scopes, a high school teacher there, was accused of breaking the law by promoting Charles Darwin's theory of evolution. The trial's proceedings sparked an ongoing national discussion about the validity of evolution while also assisting in bringing the scientific evidence for it into the public eye. The Butler Act, which forbade the teaching of any concept that denied the divine creation of man as taught by the Bible, was approved by the Tennessee legislature in March 1925.
To learn more about scopes trial click,
https://brainly.com/question/3434522
#SPJ1
And please create a three paragraph essay that supports this
In writing an essay you must consider the structure of the essay, Hence, the structure of the essay should be considered;
The Introduction The body'The conclusionWhat is a three-paragraph essay?Generally, Federalists, such as Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, believed in a strong central government that could promote economic growth and stability. They supported the establishment of a national bank and a system of tariffs to fund the government. They also believed in a strong military to protect the country's interests.
Antifederalists, such as Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry, believed in limiting the power of the central government and preserving the rights of the states. They were particularly worried about the potential for tyranny if the government became too powerful. They wanted to protect individual rights and liberties and opposed the idea of a national bank and a standing army.
In terms of evidence, Federalists argued in the Federalist Papers, a series of essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, that a strong central government was necessary for the country's stability and prosperity. The Federalist Papers presented the Federalist's point of view on the proposed Constitution and its ratification.
On the other hand, Antifederalists wrote a series of essays and pamphlets, known as the Anti-Federalist Papers, in which they expressed their concerns about the Constitution and the potential dangers of a strong central government. These essays and pamphlets argued that the Constitution would lead to the erosion of individual rights and the consolidation of power in the hands of a few.
In conclusion, both Federalists and Antifederalists articulated strong visions for the country, but they had different ideas about how to achieve those goals. Federalists favored a strong central government and economic growth, while Antifederalists favored protecting individual rights and liberties and limiting the power of the central government.
Read more about essay
https://brainly.com/question/7196877
#SPJ1
How did Conservative Patriots view common people? What did they want to preserve?
Answer:
The conservative patriots view peole as a rightful candidate and they they want to preserve thier rights.
please help with these questions
1. The legislative branch creates proposed legislation, approves or disapproves presidential nominations for the Supreme Court, judges of federal courts, and heads of federal agencies, among other things. It also has the power to declare war.
2. Voting allows citizens to take part in the democratic process. Leaders are chosen by the people who will serve as their representatives and champion their causes.
3. Each representative, also known as a congressman or congresswoman, is chosen by the citizens of a certain congressional district to serve a two-year term.
4. Only federal courts have the authority to interpret laws, decide whether they are constitutional, and apply them to specific situations.
What is the goal of law?There are numerous purposes for the law. Establishing norms, upholding order, settling conflicts, and defending rights and liberties are the four basic ones.
Why is the rule of law important?To guarantee accountability, stability, equality, and access to justice for all, governments must have effective laws, institutions, and procedures in place. In the end, this results in the observance of environmental and human rights. Additionally, it assists in reducing levels of corruption and violent conflict.
To know more about Law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14342080
#SPJ1
Which of these was NOT a
theory the European settlers
came up with for who built the
mounds?
A. The mounds represented the lost city of
Atlantis.
B. They were natural formations of the
Earth.
C. They were secretly built by Europeans
1,000 years before.
D. They were built by aliens many years
before the Europeans came.
Please hurry I give brain things
'They were secretly built by Europeans 1,000 years before' was not a theory the European settlers came up with for who built the mounds.
What do you mean by theory?
A theory basically is a set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena. Theories are used to make predictions about natural phenomena and to analyze relationships between different aspects of the natural world. In other words, a theory is a well-substantiated explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can incorporate laws, hypotheses and facts.
No, this is not a theory that the European settlers came up with for who built the mounds. This is a theory that is believed by some researchers who have studied the mounds and who suggest that they were built by Europeans over 1,000 years ago, long before European settlers arrived in the area. This theory is not accepted by all researchers and is still a matter of debate.
Hence, option C is correct.
To know more about theory,
https://brainly.com/question/29588295
#SPJ1
How did President Roosevelt indicate his commitment to being prepared for war?
Responses
called for large contracts for corporations that built tanks, planes, and jeeps
called for large contracts for corporations that built tanks, planes, and jeeps
detailed preparations in his inaugural and State of the Union addresses
detailed preparations in his inaugural and State of the Union addresses
changed the name of the Department of Defense to the Department of War
changed the name of the Department of Defense to the Department of War
signed the Selective Service Act requiring young men to serve in the military
Answer:
signed the selective service Act requiring young men to serve in the military
Help me please
Thank you :)
Have a great day :)
Answer:
what was the story
Explanation:
read the story answered solve
What are the speaker’s motives for moving his family out West?
"I Will Go West!" is written from the perspective of a white settler. How were experiences moving and working out West similar or different for other groups?
Choose three of the groups listed below and describe how their experience was similar to or different from the experience described in the song.
Forty-niners
Miners
Californios
Chinese immigrants
African Americans
Native Americans
Group How were this group's experiences moving and working out West similar to or different from those of the white settler in the song?
The speaker's motives for moving his family out West, as described in the song "I Will Go West!", appear to be driven by a desire for adventure, freedom, and opportunity. The speaker expresses excitement at the prospect of exploring new territory, starting a new life, and building a better future for himself and his family.
Moving and working out West were similar and different for various groups during the 19th century. For example, Forty-niners, who migrated to California during the gold rush of 1849, shared the white settler's desire for opportunity and adventure. However, their experiences were often marked by harsh conditions, violence, and exploitation.Miners, who worked in various mining towns throughout the West, faced similar challenges, including dangerous working conditions, low wages, and discrimination. However, their experiences were also shaped by their specific ethnic and cultural backgrounds, with many miners being of Irish or Mexican descent.Californios, who were Mexican residents of California, experienced significant displacement and marginalization as a result of white settlers' expansion into their territory. Chinese immigrants faced similar challenges, including discrimination and violence, as they were often employed in low-paying and dangerous jobs such as railroad construction and mining.
To learn more about freedom click the link below:
brainly.com/question/31037673
#SPJ1
portuguese explorer credited as being the first to circumnavigate the world.____
The Portuguese explorer Ferdinand Magellan is credited as being the first to circumnavigate the world.
He set sail in 1519 and returned in 1522, having successfully travelled around the globe. Magellan's journey was the first of its kind, and it demonstrated the potential for exploration and trade across the globe.
Magellan's journey was a monumental achievement, and it laid the foundations for further exploration and trade between Europe and the Americas. It showed that it was possible to travel large distances and to reach far-off lands, and it opened up new possibilities for trade and commerce. The journey also showed that the world was a much larger place than was previously believed, and it showed that it was possible to travel around the globe.
Learn more about Ferdinand Magellan:
https://brainly.com/question/13864491
#SPJ4
1. How is Gary a threat to Frank’s status in the school?
Answer:
????
Explanation:
this doesn't make sense
Which factor limited the economic opportunities of emancipated African Americans?
A. Their high wage demands
B. a shortage of factory jobs
C. the widespread refusal to remain in farm jobs
D. a lack of education
A lack of education is the factor that limited the economic opportunities of emancipated African Americans. option [D] is the correct answer to the above statement.
What kind of reactions did African Americans have to emancipation?
Even though many black leaders criticized Lincoln for his hesitant attempts to end slavery, both the freed and imprisoned African-American community celebrated the Emancipation Proclamation's ultimate declaration as a crucial step towards liberation.
The barrier limiting the economic potential of freed African Americans was a lack of education. The appropriate response to the preceding assertion is an option [D].
Therefore, The structure of the African American family was impacted by the emancipation of slaves since it brought about more stability.
Learn more about African Americans from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/29744813
#SPJ1
How does division of power guard against tyranny? Long explanation
Answer:
The separation of powers guards against tyranny by making unilateral action by any branch more difficult through checks and balances. The founders developed the separation of powers so that each branch would check and halt the others when there was no consensus and be required to compromise to accomplish their goals.
Explanation:
what 1857 supreme court case declared the missouri compromise unconstitutional?
In its 1857 decision, which stunned the whole nation, the United States Supreme Court maintained slavery in American territories, disregarded the legitimacy of black citizenship in the nation, and declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional.
Chief Justice Roger Taney and six other Justices judged the Missouri Compromise to be illegal because the Fifth Amendment protected slave owners' property rights and Congress lacked the power to ban slavery in the territories.
All of this was the outcome of an April 1846 action in which Dred Scott unintentionally signed his name with a "X" on his petition in a pro forma freedom suit filed in the St. Louis Circuit Court in accordance with Missouri law.
To learn more about Missouri Compromise, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/18367808
#SPJ4
What percent of people in Poland are "working age"?
The term "working age" is generally defined as the age range between 15 and 64 years old. According to Eurostat, the statistical office of the European Union, as of 2020, the working age population in Poland was around 69.5%. This means that 69.5% of the population in Poland was between the ages of 15 and 64.
It is worth noting that the working age population percentage can vary depending on the country and the specific definition used. In some cases, the working age population may be defined as those between 16 and 64 years old, while in others it may be defined as those between 18 and 65 years old.
Additionally, the working age population percentage can also be affected by factors such as migration, birth rates, and life expectancy. For example, if there is a high migration of young people or a high birth rate, the working age population percentage may be higher than in a country with low migration or birth rate.
know more about Poland's:-
https://brainly.com/question/456197
what do the shadows represent in the allegory of the cave
In the allegory of the cave the items under the sun depict the genuine shapes of objects, which we can only perceive via reason, while the shadows depict the portion of reality that we typically perceive with our senses.
There are three higher levels: the theory of forms; the natural sciences; and mathematics, geometry, and deductive logic. Socrates compares the philosopher to a prisoner who escapes from a cave and realizes that the images seen are not genuinely being created by the shadows on the wall. A philosopher seeks to comprehend and see reality's higher planes. The other cave dwellers, on the other hand, have no desire to flee their cage because they have never known anything better.
To know more about the allegory of the cave:
https://brainly.com/question/24243913
#SPJ4
Which best explains why the supreme court’s decision in plessy v. ferguson was unconstitutional? a. the supreme court’s ruling allowed states to deny equal protection to any person within its jurisdiction. b. since the 14th amendment did not make concessions for people born outside the us, the supreme court’s decision could not be applied.c. the supreme court’s decision gave individual states the freedom to make their own laws in relation to the treatment of people of color. d. since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to people of color, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th amendment.
Since segregation laws did not afford non-whites equal protection or liberties, the Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson was unconstitutional and did not follow the 14th Amendment.
Hence, option (b) is the correct choice.
The verdict did not follow the 14th Amendment since segregation laws did not grant non-whites equal protection or privileges.
The Supreme Court ruled in Plessy v. Ferguson that segregation was acceptable as long as it was "separate but equal." However, it was established in Brown v. Board of Education that things are not equal when they are distinct. They were fostering inequality by allowing for separation. This thus demonstrated the unconstitutionality of the Plessy v. Ferguson decision. The fact that the judgement has never been reversed is interesting. Other rulings, such as Brown v. Board of Education, have contributed to ending separate but equal.
Read more on the constitution here: brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
The best explanation for why the Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson was unconstitutional is that since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to people of color, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th amendment. Here option D is the correct answer.
In Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of state laws that required racial segregation in public places.
The Court's ruling was based on the "separate but equal" doctrine, which held that as long as the separate facilities provided to different races were equal in quality, segregation was constitutional.
However, this decision was later overturned in the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, in which the Supreme Court ruled that segregation in public education was unconstitutional because it had a detrimental effect on minority students and that segregation was inherently unequal.
To learn more about Plessy v. Ferguson
https://brainly.com/question/12846797
#SPJ4
what is an imperial power and how americans reacted to the u.s. expansion beyond the continental united states during the early 20th century
An imperial power is a nation that exerts political, economic, and military control over other territories, and expansion beyond continental US led to some viewing it either as necessary progress, or a violation of principles.
An imperial power is defined as a nation with political, economic, and military control over other territories and peoples. During the early 20th century, the United States expanded beyond the continental United States through colonization, annexation, and military intervention, leading to mixed reactions among Americans.
Some Americans viewed it as a necessary step in the country's progress and expansion, while others saw it as a violation of the nation's principles of freedom and self-government.
Some critics also argued that the expansion was driven by economic and political interests rather than a desire to spread democracy and freedom. Overall, the expansion of the US beyond the continental US during the early 20th century was a complex and controversial issue with different perspectives and opinions.
To learn more about imperial power visit: https://brainly.com/question/16780831
#SPJ4
in 1861, georgia left the united states and joined another country. who did it join?
In 1861 Georgia joined South Carolina, Florida, Mississippi and Alabama after Leaving the United States of Americas.
Following nearly two decades of escalating sectional struggle over slavery's legal standing in western territories and the country's destiny, Georgia declared its independence from the Union.
One of the original seven slave states that united to form the Confederate States of America in February 1861 and start the American Civil War was Georgia.
In opposition to Confederate president Jefferson Davis, who intended to utilise the locally raised men on other fronts, the state's Democratic governor Joseph E. Brown insisted that they only be used for Georgia's defence.
Brown ordered farmers to cultivate food instead of cotton when the Union blockade stopped Georgia from selling its abundant cotton in exchange for essential imports, but the failure of transportation networks resulted in severe shortages.
To know more about Georgia, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14061051
#SPJ4
policy of threatening to use nuclear weapons if a Communist state tried to seize territory by force
a. military-industrial complex
b. massive retaliation
c. Central Intelligence Agency
d. developing nations
The policy of threatening to use nuclear weapons if a Communist state attempted to seize territory by force. Assigning a higher priority to nuclear weapons allowed for the reduction of costly conventional forces. Massive retaliation was the strategy that emerged from these considerations.
The United States will defend its allies with a "deterrent of great retaliatory strength," according to John Foster Dulles, secretary of state, in a speech at a Council on Foreign Relations luncheon in his honor. Eisenhower's decision to make the nation's nuclear arsenal the first line of defense against communist attacks was reinforced by the policy pronouncement.
Both worries were allayed by a heavier reliance on nuclear weapons as the cornerstone of America's security, as these weapons were both far more cost-effective in the long run and significantly more effective at posing a threat to potential enemies.
To learn more about Massive retaliation, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/9642631
#SPJ4
How does the Congress of Vienna respond to news of
Napoleon's return, and where does he attack
their armies?
Answer:
The Congress of Vienna was shocked, and immediately declared Napoleon an outlaw. The Hundred Days came to climax and conclusion at the Battle of Waterloo, where the British army under Wellington was joined by a revitalized Prussian force under Blucher. Together, the British and the Prussians managed to defeat Napoleon.
Explanation:
What was Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s contribution to American literature?
Answer:
The answers to your question is ⇔ He was the first American to completely translate Dante Alighieri's Divine Comedy, and was one of the fireside poets from New England.
Explanation:
I hope this helps and have a wonderful day!
Summarize the life of andrew jackson
Answer: Andrew Jackson was the seventh President of the United States from 1829 to 1837, seeking to act as the direct representative of the common man. More nearly than any of his predecessors, Andrew Jackson was elected by popular vote; as President, he sought to act as the direct representative of the common man.
Explanation:
In this passage from a from The Federalist papers James Madison discusses the harmful effects that factionalism can affect can have on a government remember that factionalism occurs when a larger political group becomes divided into smaller groups those groups often share a common interest as a federalist Madison believe that a strong central government would help prevent factionalism
Yes Madison believed in the ratification of the constitution as a way that would have it stop factions.
Why did Madison think the constitution should be ratified?The Federalist Papers is a collection of 85 essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay under the pseudonym "Publius" to promote the ratification of the United States Constitution. They discuss various aspects of the proposed Constitution, including the nature of republican government, the separation of powers, and the dangers of factionalism.
Madison, in particular, believed that a strong central government would help prevent the harmful effects of factionalism by promoting a sense of national unity and preventing the rise of powerful interest groups.
Read more on the Federalist papers here: https://brainly.com/question/24714949
#SPJ1
How do the many Objects on display in the museum offer insight into Catherine the greats life
In the early days of her marriage, she first read Voltaire and other French Enlightenment philosophers.
What motivated Catherine the Great to be a revolutionary?It is impossible to deny that her rule resulted in considerable developments in the Russian legal and educational institutions. Catherine the Great is thus a revolutionary figure, not because she intended to overthrow the old system, but because she sought to align it with contemporary values.
She was Russia’s longest-reigning empress, known as Catherine the Great. Catherine’s most notable achievements were instituting educational reform, supporting the arts, and enlarging Russia’s boundaries in the largest territorial gain since Ivan the Terrible. Catherine’s view of development reflected the dedication of the larger Enlightenment to the values of reason as well as ‘toleration’ and ‘curbing religious fanaticism’.
To learn more about Catherine the Great to refer:
https://brainly.com/question/951321
#SPJ1
in the period before 600 B.C.E, the adoption of agriculture had significant social, economic, and demographic effects
develop an argument that evaluates how the adoption of agriculture in this time period affected the development of human societies.
Answer:
It led to a surplus of food, which in turn allowed some individuals to pursue artistic or cultural work. It also led to the development of cities and of an organized writing system. Finally, it led to the emergence of political and social hierarchies as some people accumulated wealth and power.
How did Ross Perot influence the race?
Ross Perot influenced the race because Bill Clinton made it a priority to..
On July 9, 2019, business mogul, politician, and philanthropist Henry Ross Perot died. Henry Ross Perot was his given name when he was born. He founded and led Perot Technologies & Electronic Data Systems.
What effect on the race did Ross Perot have?Perot relied on marketing and widespread grassroots support to finance the majority of his campaign. He was in the lead among the three candidates in various polls, which also included Republican nominee George H. W. Bush, the current President, and Democratic nominee Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton.
How did Ross Perot influence the outcome of the 1992 presidential election?Due to the evenly distributed nature of his supporters, he did not win any states in the Electoral College, despite receiving more than 30% of the vote in Maine and 27% in Utah, ranking second in both states. For the first time since George Wallace in 1968, a third-party candidate, Ross Perot, won a county election.
Learn more about Electoral College: https://brainly.com/question/7954182
#SPJ1
in 1857 a growing indian distrust of the british led to
In 1857, a growing Indian distrust of the British led to a rebellion among the Indian sepoys.
The Indian Sepoy Mutiny, also known as the Sepoy Mutiny, was the first War of Independence in Colonial India. It can be traced back to Meerut where it was initiated by Indian troops (sepoys) who were in the service of the British East India Company. It was widespread and reached Delhi, Agra, Kanpur, and Lucknow. But was unsuccessful and was suppressed by the British.
What incited this rebellion was one rumor that had spread around in the troops. This rumor was that the rifle cartridges were greased with cow and pig fat. This coupled along with mistrust in the government made way for the rebellion to take place and caused a lot of casualties on both sides with the Indians killing 200 defenseless women and children.
Learn more about the Sepoy Mutiny on
https://brainly.com/question/29774528?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
What factors do you take into account when deciding how quickly to respond to a message? Do certain people or topics elicit a prompt response?why do you think that is
The factors you take into account when deciding how quickly to respond to a message are the behavior of another person and the need to reply quickly.
What is the message?A message is referred to as a medium for communication through communication is passed. It can be a text message or written message or verbal message which helps in sharing thoughts or ideas.
When the behavior of the sender is supportive in this case, a quick response to the message is given. Apart from that the content of the message like an emergency message requires a quick response.
Learn more about message response, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27426562
#SPJ1
true or false: english colonization would look very different from spanish or french colonization. england had long been trying to conquer catholic ireland. rather than integrating with the irish and trying to convert them to protestantism, england more often simply seized land through violence and pushed out the former inhabitants, leaving them to move elsewhere or to die. these same tactics would later be deployed in north american invasions.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
English colonization of Ireland and later in North America involved different tactics and approach compared to Spanish or French colonization. England had a long history of trying to conquer Catholic Ireland, and their tactics included seizing land through violence and pushing out the former inhabitants, rather than integrating with them and trying to convert them to Protestantism. This same approach would later be deployed in the English colonization of North America, where land was taken from Indigenous peoples through violence and displacement.
what occurred in the united states following the death of martin luther king jr.?
Baptist clergyman and social activist Martin Luther King Jr. gained notoriety for his role in the American civil rights movement from the middle of the 1950s until the time of his murder in 1968.
Following the killing of Martin Luther King Jr. on April 4, 1968, a wave of civil unrest known as the King assassination riots, often referred to as the Holy Week Uprising, swept the United States. They are regarded by many as the largest wave of social upheaval to hit the United States since the Civil War.
Martin Luther was the impetus behind historic actions like the Montgomery Bus Boycott and the 1963 March on Washington, which helped pass the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act, among other important pieces of legislation. King received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964, and every year on January 18th, he is honoured.
To learn more about Martin Luther, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/8560787
#SPJ4