The two triangles illustrate below are similar. What are the values of x and y?​

Answer:

15

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratio of trucks to cars is 6x/10. And in the problem it says that there are 25 cars. So, 10x = 25, x = 5/2. Then, 6x = 15

Answer:

(4 x X)-9

Step-by-step explanation:

I think this is correct pls tell me if this is wrong  

Hope this helps

The algebraic expression of Nine less than the product of four and a number is 4x-9.

An expression is combination of variables, numbers and operators.

The given sentence is 'Nine less than the product of four and a number.

We need to write this sentence as an algebraic expression.

We know that less than means there we used subtraction.

Product in the sentence means multiplication.

Let us consider x as the unknown number in the given expression.

the product of four and a number means four is multiplied with x. which is 4x.

Nine less than the product of four and a number

4x-9

Hence, the algebraic expression of Nine less than the product of four and a number is 4x-9.

To learn more on Expressions click:

https://brainly.com/question/14083225

#SPJ2

Answer:

The last question is 41!

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Angle 1 is 134 and Angle 2 is 46

Answer:

We conclude that the total amount accrued, principal plus interest,  from compound interest on an original principal of  $4,500.00 at a rate of 3.2% per year  compounded continuously  over 1.5 years is $4,721.27.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

To determine

Accrue Amount A = ?

Using the formula

[tex]A\:=\:Pe^{rt}[/tex]

substitute r = 0.032, P = 4500, and t = 1.5

[tex]A\:=\:4,500.00\left(2.71828\right)^{\left(0.032\right)\left(1.5\right)}[/tex]

A = $ 4721.27

Therefore, we conclude that the total amount accrued, principal plus interest,  from compound interest on an original principal of  $4,500.00 at a rate of 3.2% per year  compounded continuously  over 1.5 years is $4,721.27.

Answer:

The answer would be (1,4)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

ABD=23

Step-by-step explanation:

9x-22=6x-7

3x= 15

x=5 but wait thats only what X is so

9(5)-22

45-22

ABD=23

Answer:

1 to 3

Step-by-step explanation:

because if you were to divide by 2 you would get your base number 1 that is simplest form

Answer:

(x+1) (x−6)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x 2 − 5 x − 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

times .62

Answer:

if the number is anything then I pick 10 so 5 because 10 - 5 = 5 I guess lol

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

k-5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

r=d÷2

Multiply both sides by 2

d=2r

Please mark brainliest.

d = 2r

Simplification means to make any equation simple or any large equations to a simple form, simplification can be done with mathematical formula and done for all operators in mathematics.

Given r = d/2

when we transfer digits to other sides of equal they change their sign,

plus tends to minus or vice versa,

and multiply tends to divide or vice versa.

so d = 2r

Hence the solution for d is 2r

Learn more about simplification;

https://brainly.com/question/28996879

#SPJ2

Answer:

-1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

slope = rise/run = -1/3

Im pretty sure the answer is c.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:YOU HAVE TO SHOW ME THE WHOLE THING SO THAT I CAN ANSWER IT DUH

Answer: GCF

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

years later , karen withdrew the full amount to put toward the down payment on a new house. How much did she withdraw? ... gaines invested $15,000 in a money market account with an interest rate of 2.75% compounded semiannually. ... Median response time is 34 minutes and may be longer for new subjects.

Answer:

1. Assume the contrary, namely that √2 + √3 + √5 = r, where r is a rational number.

Square the equality √2 + √3 = r − √5 to obtain 5 + 2

√6 = r2 + 5 − 2r

√5. It follows

that 2√6 + 2r

√5 is itself rational. Squaring again, we find that 24 + 20r2 + 8r

√30

is rational, and hence √30 is rational, too. Pythagoras’ method for proving that √2 is

irrational can now be applied to show that this is not true. Write √30 = m

n in lowest

terms; then transform this into m2 = 30n2. It follows that m is divisible by 2 and because

2( m

2 )2 = 15n2 it follows that n is divisible by 2 as well. So the fraction was not in lowest

terms, a contradiction. We conclude that the initial assumption was false, and therefore

√2 + √3 + √5 is irrational.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2 a 3 d 4 c 5 b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct expressions that represent the total number of inches braided by robin and Olivia is,

⇒ 4 (1/3g - 3)

Mathematical expression is defined as the collection of the numbers variables and functions by using operations like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

We have to given that;

Robin braided g inches of a friendship bracelet.

And, Olivia braided 12 less than 1/3 the number of inches robin braided.

Now, The total number of inches braided by Robin and Olivia = Number of inches braided by  Robin + Number of inches braided by Olivia

Hence, We get;

⇒ g + 1/3g - 12

⇒ 4/3g - 12

⇒ 4 (1/3g - 3)

Thus, The correct expressions that represent the total number of inches braided by robin and Olivia is,

⇒ 4 (1/3g - 3)

Learn more about the mathematical expression visit:

brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ6

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

x must equal 2 and 2 to the power of 2 is 4

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

Original equation: 3x-1=5

Add 1 on both sides: 3x=6

Divide by 3 on both sides: x=2

If x=2, then x^2 = 4.

Let me know if this helps!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-18/0 or 0

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Behavioral Research in Accounting (January 2008) study of Machiavellian traits in accountants

a) Population of interest to the researcher: accountants

b) Sample = 700 accounting alumni

c) The inference made by the researcher = Machiavellian behavior is not required to achieve success in the accounting profession.

d) The non-responses reduce the sample size and this might introduce bias to the inference made to the population.

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Research Question = Is Machiavellian behavior is required to achieve success in the accounting profession?

Population of interest = all accountants

Sample size = 700 accounting alumni of a university

No. of analyzed questionnaires = 198

No. of questionnaires not analyzed due to nonresponse and incomplete answers = 502 (700 - 198)

Percentage of analyzed questionnaires to sample size = 28.3% (198/700 *100)

Percentage of questionnaires not analyzed = 71.7% (100% - 28.3%)

Conclusion reached by the researchers = Machiavellian behavior is not required to achieve success in the accounting profession.

Answer:

x = -8

Step-by-step explanation:

-9 (x+2) = 54

-9x - 18 = 54

-9x = 72

x = -8

Hope this helps :)

Let me know if there are any mistakes!!

Answer:

6.28

Step-by-step explanation:

C=2πr=2·π·1≈6.28319

Hope this helps ;)

Answer:

9 cans of soup and the 4 frozen dinners were purchased

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x represent the number of cans of soup purchased.

Let y represent the number of frozen dinners purchased.

Lincoln purchased a total of 13 cans of soup and frozen dinners. This means that

x + y = 13

Each can of soup has 250 mg of sodium and each frozen dinner has 550 mg of sodium. The 13 cans of soup and frozen dinners which he purchased collectively contain 4450 mg of sodium. This means that

250x + 550y = 4450 - - - - - - - - -1

Substituting x = 13 - y into equation 1, it becomes

250(13 - y) + 550y = 4450

3250 - 250y + 550y = 4450

- 250y + 550y = 4450 - 3250

300y = 1200

y = 1200/300

y = 4

Substituting y = 4 into x = 13 - y, it becomes

x = 13 - 4 = 9