Pls help pls help pls help

Answer:

B or D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

C.

Step-by-step explanation:

G(x) = 5x - 2

G^-1 = everything will become a fraction with one as the numerator and all negatives on the bottom become a positive constant.

G^-1(x) = (x/5) + 2

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't understand your language but if it's the solution;

(a+1)-(-8)= -9

Remove the parentheses

a+1+8= -9

Collect the like terms

a= -9-8-1

a= -18

Answer:

a

The decision rule  is  

Reject the null hypothesis

  The conclusion is  

There is sufficient evidence to show that there is a difference between the performances of these two models

b

The  95% confidence interval is  [tex] 0.224   <  \mu_1 - \mu_2  < 2.776  [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

    The sample size is  n  =  36

    The first sample mean is  [tex]\= x_1 = 11.4[/tex]

    The first standard deviation is  [tex]s_1 = 2.5[/tex]

    The second sample mean is   [tex]\= x_2 = 9.9[/tex]

     The second standard deviation is  [tex]s_2 = 3.0[/tex]

      The level of significance is  [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o : \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0[/tex]

The alternative hypothesis is [tex]H_a : \mu_1 - \mu_2 \ne 0[/tex]

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

      [tex]z = \frac{ (\= x_1 - \= x_2 ) - (\mu_1 - \mu_2 ) }{ \sqrt{ \frac{s_1^2 }{n} + \frac{s_2^2 }{ n} } }[/tex]

=>    [tex]z = \frac{ ( 11.4 - 9.9) - 0 }{ \sqrt{ \frac{2.5^2 }{36} + \frac{ 3^2 }{36 } } }[/tex]

=>     [tex]z = 2.3[/tex]

From the z table  the area under the normal curve to the left corresponding to  2.3 is  

       [tex]P( Z > 2.3 ) = 0.010724[/tex]

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

      [tex]p-value = 2 * P( Z > 2.3 )[/tex]

=>    [tex]p-value = 2 * 0.010724[/tex]

=>    [tex]p-value = 0.02[/tex]

From the value obtained we see that  [tex]p-value < \alpha[/tex] hence  

The decision rule  is  

Reject the null hypothesis

  The conclusion is  

There is sufficient evidence to show that there is a difference between the performances of these two models

Considering question b

From the question we are told the confidence level is  95% , hence the level of significance is    

      [tex]\alpha = (100 - 95 ) \%[/tex]

=>   [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

Generally from the normal distribution table the critical value  of  [tex]\frac{\alpha }{2}[/tex] is  

   [tex]Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } =  1.96[/tex]

Generally the margin of error is mathematically represented as  

      [tex]E = Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } *  \sqrt{ \frac{s_1^2 }{n } + \frac{s_2^2}{n}} [/tex]

 => [tex]E = 1.96  *    \sqrt{ \frac{2.5^2 }{ 36 } + \frac{ 3^2}{36}}  [/tex]

  => [tex]E = 1.276   [/tex]

Generally 95% confidence interval is mathematically represented as  

      [tex]( \= x_1 - \= x_2) -E <  \mu_1 - \mu_2  < ( \= x_1 - \= x_2) + E [/tex]

=>  [tex]( 11.4 - 9.9 ) -1.276  <  \mu_1 - \mu_2 < ( 11.4 - 9.9 ) + 1.276   [/tex]

=>  [tex] 0.224   <  \mu_1 - \mu_2  < 2.776  [/tex]

Answer:

1 foot=1 milimeter

Step-by-step explanation:

have a great day

Answer:

6.37 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

38

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

8 gallons equals 64 pints since there are 8 pints in a gallon

Step-by-step explanation:

take care

Answer:

22) x - 46 = 74

23) 20 portions

Step-by-step explanation:

21)

Let x = the number of cars Sara sold.

Jerry sold 46 cars fewer than Sara, so Jerry sold x - 46 cars.

Jerry sold 74 cars, so the equation is

x - 46 = 74

Answer: x - 46 = 74

22)

Let the number of 1/3 lb portions = x

The weight of x number of 1/3-lb portions is 1/3 * x, or simply x/3.

The full bag weighs 6 2/3 lb.

The equation is

x/3 = 6 2/3

Now we solve for x.

x/3 = 20/3

Multiply both sides by 3.

x = 20

Answer: 20 portions

Answer:

let 's' = Sara's amount

let 's-46' = Jerry's amount

equation:  s - 46 = 74

s = 120

Step-by-step explanation:

2nd question:  [tex]\frac{20}{3}[/tex] ÷ [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{20}{3}[/tex]· [tex]\frac{3}{1}[/tex] = 20

Answer:

and "Bumps"

Purplemath

Graphs of polynomials don't always head in just one direction, like nice neat straight lines. Instead, they can (and usually do) turn around and head back the other way, possibly multiple times. Each time the graph goes down and hooks back up, or goes up and then hooks back down, this is a "turning" of the graph.

I refer to the "turnings" of a polynomial graph as its "bumps". This isn't standard terminology, and you'll learn the proper terms (such as "local maximum" and "global extrema") when you get to calculus, but, for now, we'll talk about graphs, their degrees, and their "bumps".

For instance, the following graph has three bumps, as indicated by the arrows:

y = (1/50)(x + 5)(x^2)(x – 5), crossing at x = –5 and x = 5, and just touching at x = 0

Answer:

X∈[tex]\frac{5}{63}, -\frac{23}{63}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

384

Step-by-step explanation:

12 book stores and 32 copies of a book for each book store

12 times 32 = 384 books

Answer:

0.2%

Step-by-step explanation:

18/9000×100%

now use calculator

Answer: 0.2 percent

Step-by-step explanation:

This is the number of people who were allergic to the shampoo/ total people

18/9000

Simplify!

1/500=0.02=0.2 percent of people

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  16/7

Step-by-step explanation:

If the segments are congruent, their lengths are equal:

  (1/2)x -3 = 5 -3x

  (3 1/2)x = 8

  x = 8/(3.5) = 16/7

The value of x is 16/7.

_____

Comment on the question

This value of x makes the lengths of the segments be -13/7 units. Usually, negative lengths are considered impossible for line segments.

Answer:

2 boxes

Step-by-step explanation:

do 16 times 2 you get 32 so there are 32 green crayons 32/9 9 times 3 is 36 which is over 32 so you cant fill 3 boxes 9 times 2 equals 27 so the answer would be she can fill 2 boxes

Answer:

16/24

Step-by-step explanation: Multiply the fractions....( / )

By one by one then divided them together.

Answer:

2 1/6 longer

Step-by-step explanation:

3 1/2-1 1/3

7/2 - 4/3

21/6-8/6

13/6 or 2 1/6

so 2 1/6 longer.

Hope this helps :D

Answer:

2 1/6 hours longer

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope the helps!

Answer:

Please check the explanation.

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that the slope or rate of change of the function can be:

Function 1

From the function 1 graph, it is clear that the graph is a horizontal line. We must note that the horizontal line has a slope or rate of change zero. The reason is that the horizontal line can not rise vertically. i.e. y₂-y₁=0

so using the slope formula

Rate of change = m = y₂-y₁ / x₂-x₁

Taking two points (x₁, y₁) = (0, 4), (x₂, x₁) = (1, 4)

Rate of change = m = 4-4 / 1-0

Rate of change = m = 0/1

Rate of change = m = 0

Thus, the rate of change of function 1 is zero.

Function 2

We know the slope-intercept form of linear equation is

[tex]y = mx+b[/tex]

where m is the rate of change or slope of the function and b is the y-intercept

Given the function

[tex]y = 8x+12[/tex]

comparing with the slope-intercept form i.e. y = mx+b

Therefore, the rate of change of function 2 = m = 8

Conclusion

The rate of change of function 1  = 0

The rate of change of function 2  = 8

as

Therefore, function 2 has 8 more rate of change of function than the rate of change of function 1.

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

in an equilateral triangle all the sides are equal

Answer:

9(4a+1)=

10(4+5d)=

7(4-f)=

Step-By-Step Solution:

The greatest common factor is the largest number that both numbers can be divided by. For example, in #1, 36 and 9 can both be divided by 9 to become 4 and 1.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Write the equation in point slope form. Remember, point slope form looks like this: y-y1=m(x-x1), with m representing slope. With this equation, you plug in the y coordinate for y1 and the x coordinate for x1. So, it will look like this

y+6=2/3(x+5)

2. Then, convert that into slope intercept form, which is y=mx+b.

y+6=2/3x+10/3 (2/3 * 5)

y= 2/3x - 8/3 (10/3 - 6)

Therefore, your slope-intercept form of the equation is: y=2/3x - 8/3

3. From there, you can graph the line. See the graph in the image attached.

Answer:

1.5555556

1 5/9

14/9

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

We can't see the graph i can help if you insert it

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

first step, multiply 4 and 3

4x3=12  ,  we write is 1.2x10

10^5 x10^3=10^8

4 x10^5 x 3 x 10^3= 1.2x10^9

The required answer is 1.20 x 10⁹ in scientific notation.

Scientific notation is a method of writing extremely large or extremely small numbers. When a number between 1 and 10 is multiplied by a power of 10, it is written in scientific notation.

Here,
To multiply two numbers in scientific notation, we multiply their coefficients and add their exponents. Applying this rule, we get:

= (4.0 x 10⁵) x (3.0 x 10³)
= (4.0 x 3.0) x (10³ x 10⁵)

= 12.0 x 10⁵⁺³
= 12.0 x 10⁸

However, the answer is not yet in proper scientific notation form because the coefficient 12.0 is not between 1 and 10. To express the answer in scientific notation, we need to adjust the coefficient and exponent so that the coefficient is between 1 and 10. We can do this by dividing the coefficient by 10 and increasing the exponent by 1. Doing this, we get:

12.0 x 10⁸ = 1.20 x 10⁹

Therefore, the answer is 1.20 x 10⁹ in scientific notation.

Learn more about scientific notation here: https://brainly.com/question/13091583
#SPJ7

Answer:

this is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

1125=11×425×4=44100=0.44

Answer:

Option b is the correct answer as both the equations are true for given solution.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given equations are:

-0.1x-0.3y=1.2

0.2x-0.5y=2

We can observe each graph and find the point that is the solution and put the point in the equations to know if that point is the solution

For option A:

(0,4)

Putting x=0 and y = 4 in both equations

[tex]-0.1(0)-0.3(4)=1.2\\0-1.2 =1.2\\-1.2 \neq 1.2\\0.2(0)-0.5(4)=2\\0-2 = 2\\-2 \neq 2[/tex]

This is not the correct answer as both equations are not true with this solution

For Option B:

(0,-4)

Putting x = 0 and y = -4 in both equations

[tex]-0.1(0)-0.3(-4)=1.2\\0+1.2 = 1.2\\1.2 = 1.2\\0.2x-0.5y=2\\0.2(0)-0.5(-4) = 2\\2 = 2[/tex]

Both equations are true for (0,-4) hence it is the solution of the system.

For Option C:

(4,0)

[tex]-0.1(4)-0.3(0)=1.2\\-0.4-0 = 1.2\\-0.4 \neq 1.2\\0.2x-0.5y=2\\0.2(4)-0.5(0) = 2\\0.8 \neq 2[/tex]

Not true for both equations

Hence,

Option b is the correct answer.