{PLS HELP AND PLS FOLLOW WHAT IT SAYS TO DO I WILL GIVE BRAINLIST ) Write as if you are a worker in America in the late 19th century. Describe the struggles you endure and what changes you think needs to be made. Explain why you would contemplate following Eugene V. Debs and why his theories appeal to you.

Answer:

B false

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer to question #7 is Strict

The answer to question #8 is Dislike Him

Just commenting so I can ask another question’

Answer:to combat something something

Explanation:i just did it

Answer:

to combat the effects of weightlessness

Explanation:

I got it right.

(...the agency has solved some of the negative effects of weightlessness on bodies...)

Answer: Democracy is a government system of the people, while in authoritarian systems, one person or a small group of people decides.

Explanation:

The majority characterizes a democratic political system, i.e., the people who elect their government and representatives in power. The people have the right to remove government representatives during elections if they believe that they are not working in their interest. On the other hand, authoritarian governments are not characterized by the people's ability to elect a government. Authoritarian regimes are also not indicated by the existence of an opposition in power but by a complete system in the hands of one man or a smaller group of people.

Answer:

B. Carl Vinson

The father of the Two-Ocean Navy Act!

I think it is B, Carl Vinson

Answer:

Escape religious persecution

Explanation:

Anti-semetism was prevalent in Europe for a long time.

Answer:

it related to lawsuit because it was a trial and that's all i know of :)

Explanation:

i hope that helped

In March of 1857, the United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks -- slaves as well as free -- were not and could never become citizens of the United States. The court also declared the 1820 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, thus permiting slavery in all of the country's territories.

The case before the court was that of Dred Scott v. Sanford. Dred Scott, a slave who had lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back to the slave state of Missouri, had appealed to the Supreme Court in hopes of being granted his freedom.

Taney -- a staunch supporter of slavery and intent on protecting southerners from northern aggression -- wrote in the Court's majority opinion that, because Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue. The framers of the Constitution, he wrote, believed that blacks "had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic, whenever profit could be made by it."

Referring to the language in the Declaration of Independence that includes the phrase, "all men are created equal," Taney reasoned that "it is too clear for dispute, that the enslaved African race were not intended to be included, and formed no part of the people who framed and adopted this declaration. . . ."

Abolitionists were incensed. Although disappointed, Frederick Douglass, found a bright side to the decision and announced, "my hopes were never brighter than now." For Douglass, the decision would bring slavery to the attention of the nation and was a step toward slavery's ultimate destruction.

Answer:

#1 Peaceful protest

Explanation:

Answer:

i think it’s looting and violence  but i am not sure

Explanation:

Answer:

a friendly nation does not occupy another country

an associate who provides cooperation or assistance; "he's a good ally in fight"