Answer:
In Griffin v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination not only allows a criminal defendant to refuse to take the witness stand during his trial, but it also bars the prosecutor from urging the jury to interpret that silence as an indication that the defendant has something to hide. The Court reasons that the right against self-incrimination would be meaningless if a defendant’s exercise of the right could be used against him.
Hope this helps
A Supreme Court justice who believes strongly in judicial restraint would
most likely agree with which statement?
The Supreme Court's most important role is to ensure that
Congress does not enact policies that discriminate against
people.
B. The Supreme Court should use its power to interpret U.S. laws to
better protect citizens from injustice and unfairness.
O C. The Supreme Court should issue only majority opinions and do
away with dissenting and concurring,opinions.
D. The Supreme Court's rulings should reflect the exact text of the
Constitution rather than justices own beliefs.
A Supreme Court justice who believes strongly in judicial restraint would most likely agree with this statement: D. The Supreme Court's rulings should reflect the exact text of the Constitution rather than justices own beliefs.
Supreme Court is a federal court and it's known to be the highest court based on the hierarchy of courts in the judicial branch. Thus, Supreme Court is referred to as the ap-ex court.
Generally, the Supreme Court comprises nine (9) justices:
A chief justice.Eight (8) associate justices.Judicial restraint can be defined as a procedural or substantive approach to judicial interpretation and review which asserts that judges should hesitate in the exercise of their own power to strike down laws unless they are unconstitutional and illegitimate. Thus, a Supreme Court justice is expected to make decisions strictly based on the constitution or a landmark case.
In conclusion, a Supreme Court justice who believes strongly in judicial restraint would most likely agree that, the rulings of the Supreme Court's should always reflect the exact text of the Constitution rather than their own beliefs.
Read more: https://brainly.com/question/10946441
Which of the following is a key element in the criminal act of arson?
A. The intent to do harm or defraud
B. Physical harm done to others
C. The location on the private property of another party
D. Business property destroyed
SUBMIT
Answer:
A. The intent to do harm or defraud
Why do we have to follow the law?
What was Officer James Perkins first job and how old was he?
Glenn believe that there is too much noise at night in his neighborhood.He likes to see stricter laws passed to prohibit loud music or shouting in the streets after 11:00pm what is his citizen responsibility in these circumstances
Glen's citizenship responsibility in these circumstances is to contact his representative in local government. Option (C) is correct.
What do you mean by Citizenship?A person's right to dwell in a state and that state's ability to refuse entry or deport them depends on their citizenship status.
Citizenship denotes a position of freedom with related duties. Aliens and other noncitizens living in a country are not granted or are only partially granted certain rights, obligations, and responsibilities that citizens are.
In order to empower people to take charge of their own lives and communities, citizenship education entails the development of knowledge, skills, and confidence.
Therefore, Option (C) is correct. contact his representative in local government.
Learn more about Citizenship, here;
https://brainly.com/question/18099945
#SPJ2
Your question is incomplete, most probably the complete question is;
Glenn believes that there is too much noise at night in his neighborhood. He would like to see stricter laws passed to prohibit loud music or shouting in the street after 11:00 p.m. What is his citizenship responsibility in these circumstances?
A. to write a letter to his U.S. Senator
B. to start a public protest against street noise
C. to contact his representative in local government
D. to contact the Governor of Florida with his complaint
Reconstruction of the crime is done
O at the crime scene as soon as possible
O by all the first responders
O using only physical evidence
O using the collected facts and suggestions coming from work done both at the scene and in the lab
When does a human right become a legal right?
when the human right have inspired states to enshrine such standards into national constitutions and other legislation
Lindsey lived in a public housing project. The Housing Authority tacked an eviction notice on Lindsey’s door, giving her notice that she was being legally evicted. The Housing Authority appeared in court on the appointed day, but Lindsey did not. The court granted the Housing Authority’s request for eviction because Lindsey did not appear in court as per her notice. When Lindsey’s time to appeal expired, she was evicted from her home. Lindsey claimed that she never received the Housing Authority’s notice. The Housing Authority relied on a state law that allowed it to give legal notice by tacking a notice of eviction to the occupant’s door. Lindsey filed a lawsuit against the Housing Authority alleging that her constitutional rights to due process were violated by the law. Were they? Explain your answer. [Greene v. Lindsey, 456 U.S. 444 (1982)]
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Because the Housing Authority tacked an eviction notice on Lindsey’s door. That means she has to receive it. If they send it through the mail, it'll make sense that she hasn't received the letter because it could be lost in the other mail, but the Housing Authority put it on the door which means she did see it, but she just ignored it. She knows that she was supposed to come to court on time and on the correct date. It's like if she's turning in homework late in #oogle Classroom while ignoring the due date and time. To be honest, I think that maybe the Housing Authority should of give her at least two or three warnings, but Lindsey did actually see the letter.
Brainlist pls!
match each description to the correct group or branch of government in Oklahoma.
Leadership elected in non-presidential election years
made up of two different chambers
can vote on a referendum
executive branch
legislative branch
citizens
Answer:
Executive Branch ⇒ Leadership elected in non-presidential election years.
In Oklahoma, the Governor, who is the leader of the Executive branch, is elected in a non-presidential election year with the last elections being in 2018.
Legislative Branch ⇒ Made up of two different chambers.
Like Congress, Oklahoma has a bicameral legislature therefore there are two chambers which are the Oklahoma House of Representatives and Oklahoma Senate.
Citizens ⇒ Can vote on a referendum.
Citizens of Oklahoma are the bedrock of democracy in the state and so can vote in referendums to determine changes to fix issues concerning the state.
just need the writing doesn’t have to be that long +100 points and brainless
Answer:
to read karlo
Explanation:
need to writing
similarities between nazism fascism and totalitarianism (not less than 3)
After how many years does a Utah driver's license expire?
Answer: typically 5
Explanation:
Why was Daniel Shay upset?
Answer:
He led a group of upset western Massachusetts residents who were upset about the way the state government was handling wartime debt and high taxes. In some cases, Army veterans who had never received pay for their service saw their property seized.
What are the major criminal law defenses?
society bears the costs of alcohol related crashes
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Society bears the costs of alcohol-related crashes. The given statement is True. We can become more vulnerable to both minor and major mishaps, including slips and falls, drowning, poisoning, and other unintentional injuries, when we drink alcohol. In fact, unintentional injury accounts for just under one-third (29%) of all fatalities linked to alcohol.
Why does alcohol cause accidents?It can affect decision-making while driving as well as motor skills, perception, and attention. Driving while intoxicated makes it more likely that you'll cause an accident.
Alcohol abuse has negative effects on people's health, but it also has a negative social and economic impact on both individuals and society as a whole. Early in life, drinking alcohol results in death and impairment. 13.5% of all deaths among people 20 to 39 are thought to be related to alcohol.
Thus, the mentioned given above statement is correct.
Learn more about alcohol here:
https://brainly.com/question/16975086
#SPJ2