List the five (5) elements of a scientific poll.

Answer:

The maximum possible Social Security benefit in 2021 to collect payments at age 62 is $2,324.

Based on a historical perspective, the New Jersey Plan is characterized by "weaker national government" and "single-house legislature."

New Jersey Plan was introduced during the Constitutional Convention in 1787 by William Paterson.

In contrast, the Virginia Plan is characterized by a stronger national government and a two-house legislature.

Virginia Pan was introduced during the Constitutional Convention in 1787 by James Madison.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the Constitutional Convention in 1787 had different inputs from different perceptions.

Learn more about Constitutional Convention in 1787 here: https://brainly.com/question/811214

Answer:

The New Jersey Plan had:

The Virgiinia Plan had:

Explanation:

See attached photo

cloud smoke in the car

Explanation:

because the police did not know what the person is doing in the car that cost smoke

Answer:

Option number #2

Explanation:

Hey, Ace here!

I'm not the best to consult for law, but here are my thoughts on the proceedings.

For option 1: we can rule that out as an option because the officer can clearly see the person is smoking an illegal substance.

For option 2: A police officer can view anything which any member of the public can view from a public vantage point. For example, if the police goes to the front door of a house, and can see the interior of the building, that's fair game. But if the officer starts going around the house to peek into the windows, that is not fair game. In this case, the officer climbed through the fire escape—a place that can't be viewed from a public vantage point—to look into your window.

For option 3: I believe there is probable cause to ask to inspect the car. If there is a cloud of smoke in a car, the reason for it is pretty limited. Either there is a malfunction in the car causing it to smoke up, or someone is smoking in there. Seeing the inside of the car is also from the public vantage point, so that's why I think this would be okay.

For option 4: if someone has an unregistered gun in their hands, there's probable cause for the police officer to ask for a license and permit.

Again, I'm not 100% familiar with law, but from the hours of research I have done on the 4th amendment, and from pure logic, this is what I conclude.

Hope this was helpful, let me know if you have any questions.

Answer:

In general, every crime involves three elements: first, the act or conduct (“actus reus”); second, the individual's mental state at the time of the act (“mens rea”); and third, the causation between the act and the effect (typically either "proximate causation" or "but-for causation").

Answer:

Appellate Jurisdiction

Explanation:

Answer:

Appellate jurisdiction

Explanation:

Appellate jurisdiction means that the Court has the authority to review the decisions of lower courts. Most of the cases the Supreme Court hears are appeals from lower courts. Writs of Certiorari Parties who are not satisfied with the decision of a lower court must petition the U.S. Supreme Court to hear their case.

it's definitely C I can tell this is definitely easy you're welcome.

Answer: A

Explanation: NOT C

Any driver who is taking a non-prescription drug should continue to drive regardless of any warning label on the drug.

A non-prescription drugs refers to those as drugs that are deemed safe and effective for use by the people without necessary advice from a medical practitioner.

An example of non-prescription drugs includes pain relievers, cough suppressants etc

In conclusion, any driver who is taking a non-prescription drug should continue to drive regardless of any warning label on the drug.

Read more about non-prescription drug

brainly.com/question/2343237

The court granted writs of certiorari to more than 10,000 petitioners in U.S.

The latin word "certiorari" means to make something more certain.

Writs of certiorari is a maxim in law which order the lower court to send its records on a case to the Supreme Court for review.

In recent years, for more than 5,910 petitions on Writ of Certiorari filed to the Supreme Court, there were only granted cert for only 165 cases, thus, making the practice have a success rate of only 2.8%.

In conclusion, the court granted writs of certiorari to more than 10,000 petitioners in U.S.

Read more about Writs of certiorari

brainly.com/question/11478804

Answer:

interest groups can be both beneficial and harmful to the democratic process

- interest groups can give people a voice who might otherwise not be heard

- They educate government officials and the public about particular issues, represent people across geographical boundaries, and provide a way for individuals to get involved in public affairs

- the also add another element to the checks and balances feature of the of the political process

Explanation:

sorry if it doesn't help

Answer:

evidence

Explanation:

If you cordon off too small of a crime scene, for example, you could have evidence that’s involved or affected by the commission of the crime that didn’t get secured.

Based on historical perspective, the statement that best expresses why the southern states decided to secede from the union after the election of 1860 is that "they feared their economy would be destroyed without slave labor."

Following the presidential election of 1860 in which Abraham Lincoln, a Northern Politician, and Republican, won the majority, the southerners believed there would be abolition of slavery throughout the country, affecting their economy.

The economy of the South was based on agricultural plantations in which slaves were the means of managing the farmland.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "they feared their economy would be destroyed without slave labor."

Learn more about the Southern United States here: https://brainly.com/question/640349

The defendant should be presented at the next judicial session within six hours after arrest.

The advocates of Judicial restraint believed that the supreme court should defer to the elective institutions of government.

Basically, a judicial restraint is said to occurs when a judge reaches a decision mainly on the law without any reliance political preferences.

In other word, the Judicial restraint means a judge refusal to exercise an judicial review line with politics.

In conclusion, the advocates of Judicial restraint believed that the supreme court should defer to the elective institutions of government.

Read more about Judicial restraint

brainly.com/question/857897

Answer:

The Court of International Trade

There are also two special trial courts. The Court of International Trade addresses cases involving international trade and customs laws. The U.S. Court of Federal Claims deals with most claims for money damages against the U.S. government.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

hello

hello

hello

Answer:

Construction Production

I think its right. I'm not for sure.

Answer:

The main difference between a democracy and a republic is the extent to which the people control the process of making laws under each form of government. A voting majority has almost unlimited power to make laws. Minorities have few protections from the will of the majority.

Answer:Wagner Act

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

entering and occupying property without the owner’s consent, with no intent to do anything harmful to the property--are not crimes of moral turpitude. It is important to consult with an attorney who understands California’s criminal and immigration law before pleading guilty to a Penal Code 602 PC trespass charge.

The word " Ad hoc "

Latin shorthand meaning "for this purpose only." Thus, an ad hoc committee is formed for a specific purpose, usually appointed to solve a particular problem. An ad hoc attorney is one hired to handle one problem only and often is a specialist in a particular area or considered especially able to argue a key point.

Answer:

Types of Forest in Nepal

Tropical zone(-1,000m)

Subtropical zone (1,000-2,000m)

Temperate zone (2,000-3,000m)

Subalpine zone (3,000-4,100m)

Alpine zone (4,100-5,500m)

Explanation:

A deciduous forest is a biome dominated by deciduous trees which lose their leaves seasonally. ... Trees in tropical deciduous forests lose their leaves in the dry season and regrow them in the rainy season. In temperate deciduous forests, trees lose their leaves in the fall and regrow them in the spring.

Answer: Nepal does have a range of forests that it houses..

Heres the top four: Tropical, Sub-Tropical, Temperate, and Alpine

Explanation:Answer to the difference between. Tropical Evergreen Forest and the Temperate Decidious Forest is that the Tropical receives heavy rainfall and has no actual changing weathers (seasons) .Very dense sunlight on top of forest liner but it dies not th inner ground of the forest floor.

Temperate receives different amounts of rainfall depending on the seasons in which it does have..The trees do loose their leaves as?seasons change and grow back every year (perennial)..Temperate has great ground cover that is rich with vitamins and the nutrients it needs to grow a variety of plants..Tropical forests has limited vegetation due to limited sunlite needed for most vegetation.

Examples of Temperate Growth is: Beech, Oaks, Maple, Birch and Aspin Trees also included is the loved honeysuckle and Liliac bushes..

Answer:

Hey mate....

Explanation:

This is ur answer.....

The supreme court is a court of record. As it is an advisory court it hears matters which are referred under constitution by President of India. The law which is declared by the supreme court becomes binding on all courts within India and also by union and state governments.

Hope it helps!

Brainliest pls!

Follow me! :)

Answer:

The supreme court is a court of record. ... As it is an advisory court it hears matters which are referred under constitution by President of India. The law which is declared by the supreme court becomes binding on all courts within India and also by union and state governments.

Explanation:

hope it helps

Answer:

I was so excited! but then I woke up and knew it was just a dream! it was the most interesting dream I've ever had because it's like doing something bad and getting a prize for it. This moment probably ensured a few seconds as it flashed through the neutrons of my brain, but the memory of it may last for a lifetime!