Pretend you are a part of the audience for the formal debate shown in the video below. Summarize the key points of both the affirmative and the opposing side. Then conduct some additional research to better inform yourself about the pros and cons of technology and smart devices, including the impact they have on the developing human brain. Finally, explain which side you agree with and why.
here is the transcript
"There's n othing smart about personalized intimate technology. It simply confirms our misplac ed ideal that the world revolv es around us.
Smart technology has made us smart in some unexpected ways. It's made us more responsive. It's made us more engaged.
What we've created, in other words, is an environment that is constantly frustrating our mind's ability to create deep knowledge into think deeply.
This is the greatest time in human history to be wanting to know. There is no better time. The access to information has never been this free.
We're losing that contemplative deep focused attentive state of mind that is crucial to the creation of knowledge, the creation of intelligence, and deep thinking in general.
In this age of constant distraction-- we can't focus-- we're watching seven years of Game of Th rones, the most complex narrative that we've ever seen in our world. Our universities are turning out experts and scholars who are deep into their topics-- deeper than ever, because they can go that deep because of the internet. We are knowing more and better than ever.
What we're losing is the sub tlety, the depth, the sophistication of thought. In an odd way, perhaps we're becoming like machi nes. But that, in an odd way, as well makes us du mber than we once were.
There are lots of things that people do with technology in this current moment that may not rise to the bar of tenured faculty and book writers. That doesn't necessarily mean it's dum b. What is d umb, and what is lying underneath that judgment? Buried in that is notions about what is appropriate disco urse, what is sufficiently merit-worthy.
We're not all broadcasting these deep thoughts. Were sending out links to sill y videos. We're going-- spending huge amounts of time on Fac ebook. We're spending lots of time on T witter, sending Snapc hats.
We've never had an opportunity like this, the ability to participate in the creation of knowledge. This is the smartest age we've ever had."
Answer and Explanation:
We cannot deny that the emergence of smart devices has facilitated human life in several areas, making access to information quick and practical, allowing individuals to communicate quickly, in addition to allowing quick storage of any desired information. Nowadays it is impossible to imagine our life without these devices, since we depend on them for almost all of our activities.
However, the ease of information has made our brain unaccustomed to being reflective, questioning and thoughtful, making us less intelligent, because with Smart devices we have access to ready-made information and we don't need to stimulate thinking to learn and search for it. This is what the book "The shallows: what the internet is doing to our brains" written by journalist Nicholas Carr mstra. The book presents how the dependence on smarts has impaired our concentration and reflection, making our brain less fast and efficient.
Why should journalists avoid using too many big words?
O A.
Readers cannot understand big words.
OB. They can make an article seem heavy.
O C. They run the risk of misusing the big words.
OD.
Readers have a hard time finding the facts.
Answer:
Journalists avoid using too many big words because readers cannot understand big words. Therefore, the answer. A. Readers cannot understand big words.
Answer:
C. They run the risk of missusing these words.
Explanation:
How many times have you used a big word you thought you knew the definition to only to find out you have to use it a cirtain way, welp that's why it would be C. Pluuuss, It was in my instructions. And taking times text so gotta go!
Hope this helped!
How does Thoreau support his claim in this excerpt?
A.
He uses reasoning, showing the logical consequences of supporting a cause that is wrong.
B.
He tells an anecdote about a townsman who refused to “march to Mexico” and what happened to him.
C.
He shares statistics about casualties in the Mexican-American War.
D.
He uses measurable evidence about the number of people who have refused to join the US Army.
Answer:
this isn't an answer but I'm wondering as well, I'm terrible at English and I think it sucks.
Explanation:
i could be c
Thoreau supports his claim in this excerpt: He shares statistics about casualties in the Mexican-American War. Thus, option C is the correct option.
What was Thoreau's main focus?Thoreau offers distinctive contributions to ontology, the philosophy of science, and radical political thinking in addition to his emphasis on ethics in an existential sense. Although though his writings on natural science were not even published until the late 20th century, despite the justifiable fame of his political articles, they assist to paint a more full picture of him as a thinker.
A series of manuscript volumes containing information on Native American religion and culture was one of the manuscripts he left incomplete. Thoreau's writings represent a perennially valuable challenge to our understanding of the processes and goals of philosophy itself and foreshadow certain subsequent advances in pragmatism, phenomenology, and environmental philosophy.
Learn more about Thoreau here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590105
#SPJ3
Choose the best greeting*
A- Morning, Hannah speaking. How may I help you?"
B- This is Hannah. What now?"
C-Good morning, UUM Bursary, this is Hannah speaking. How may I assist you?"
D- Good morning. How may I help you?"
Answer: D is the best
Explanation:
Hamartia means excessive pride
Select one:
True
False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
hamartia, pronounced hah-mahr-tee--uh, is derived from the Greek phrase hamartanein meaning “to err” or “to miss the mark.” Hamartia includes character flaws such as excessive ambition, greed, or pride which result in tragic consequences.