Jill collected honey from 9 different beehives, and recorded the amount collected, in gallons, from each hive in the line plot shown:
She wants to write the value of each point marked on the number line above (Points A-D) in gallons. What is the value of A using fractions?
My brother needs help I don't remember this devilish stuff

Answer:

Inequality is 460x+ 145 [tex]\leq[/tex] 625 (I can't put the less than or equal to sign down sorry)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

for the number of rubas, it keeps on doubling up while on the square number its only going up by 1 every time.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a. Yes.  This provides convincing evidence that the true proportion of all attendees who ate the fish that got sick (80%) is more than the true proportion of all attendees who did not eat the fish that got sick.

b. The mistake here would have been the rejection of the Doctor's theory or hypothesis to the effect that more attendees who ate the fish got sick than those who did not eat the fish. This is a Type 1 error.   A Type 1 error occurs when a null hypothesis is rejected when it is true. On the other hand, a Type II error occurs when the null hypothesis is accepted when it should be rejected.  While a Type I error is equivalent to a false positive, a Type II error is equivalent to a false negative.

Step-by-step explanation:

Total number of attendees who ordered fish = 1,000

Sample size of the attendees who ate fish = 80

Number of attendees who ate the fish and got sick = 64 (80% or 64/80)

Sample size of attendees who did not eat fish = 60

Number of attendees who did not eat fish and got sick = 39 (65% or 39/60)

Part A: The given evidence is convincing to provide the true proportion regarding the attendees.

Part B: The error is a type 1 error in the hypothesis testing.

A type 1 error in hypothesis testing occurs when a null hypothesis is rejected when it is true.

A type II error in hypothesis testing occurs when the investigator fails to reject the null hypothesis that is actually false.  

Given that, the total number of attendees who ordered fish is 1000. The random selection for the sample size of the attendees who ate fish is 80 of which 64 people got sick.

The number of attendees who ate the fish and got sick is calculated as given below.

No. of attendees =[tex]\dfrac {64}{80}[/tex]

% of No. of attendees = [tex]\dfrac {64}{80}\times 100[/tex]

% of No. of attendees = 80%

The random selection for the sample size of the attendees who did not eat fish is 60 of which 39 people got sick.

The number of attendees who did not eat the fish and got sick is calculated as given below.

No. of attendees  = [tex]\dfrac {39}{60}[/tex]

% of No. of attendees =[tex]\dfrac {39}{60} \times 100[/tex]

% of No. of attendees = 65%

Part A

The given evidence is convincing to provide the true proportion of all attendees who ate the fish that got sick is more than the true proportion of all attendees who did not eat the fish that got sick.

Part B

The mistake here is that the doctor's theory (hypothesis) got rejected regarding the number of attendees who ate the fish got sick than those who did not eat the fish.

This error is a type 1 error in the hypothesis testing.

To know more about the type 1 and type 2 errors, follow the link given below.

https://brainly.com/question/20914617.

Answer:

x= -1.077

Step-by-step explanation:

(13x+14) -14=0(-14)

13x/(13)= -14/(13)

x= -1.077

Answer:

1. 78.22%

2. 0.342%

3. 21.77%

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the percentage, you multiply the fraction of those tested positive/negative (based on the question) out of the total by 100%.

1. [tex]\frac{970}{1240}[/tex] × 100% = 78.22% (2 d.p.)

2. [tex]\frac{30}{8760}[/tex] × 100% = 0.342% (3 d.p.)

3. [tex]\frac{270}{1240}[/tex] × 100% = 21.77% (2 d.p.)

Step-by-step explanation:

1x+4x=180(sum of supplementary angles)

5x. =180

x. =180/5

x. = 36

Answer:

No bond, I was on the run, bet you can't relate

Totin' guns, shootin' sh,it for fun, bet you can't relate

Locked up, couldn't see my son, I bet you can't relate

Jumped the opps, ain't no one on ones, I bet you can't relate r.i.p my ni.gga von

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

11.6

Step-by-step explanation:

7 ÷ ⅗ = 11.6

I hope this answer is satisfactory. Please comment if you have any concerns.

Answer:

35/3 or 11 2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a division problem.

We need to divide 7 by 3/5.

7 / 3/5 = 7/1 / 3/5 = 7/1 * 5/3 = 35/3 = 11 2/3

Answer: 35/3 or 11 2/3

àaaaaaaaaaaaass la verdad no se

Answer:2200

Step-by-step explanation:

Easy peesy lemon squezzy

Answer:

24

Step-by-step explanation:

multiply the suit, wig and talent

3x2x4 = 24

Answer:

3.8374326e+21

Step-by-step explanation:

id.k goo.gle said this

Answer:

7 of the flowers were lilies.

Step-by-step explanation:

8 daises and 5 roses were picked. 8 + 5 = 13    20 - 13 = 7

7 of the flowers were lilies

Answer:

The ans is 3,4,5

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps you Tq

Answer: The table represents a proportional relationship.

Answer:

f(22) = 1.12

General Formulas and Concepts:

Pre-Algebra

Order of Operations: BPEMDAS

Algebra I

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

f(x) = 3sinx°

f(22) is x = 22

Step 2: Evaluate

Answer:

Hence, we fail to reject the null ;

There is no significant evidence to support the claim that the percentage of residents who favor annexation is over 34%

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

Sample size, n = 900

p = 0.37

p0 = 0.34

H0 : p = 0.34

H1 : p > 0.34

Right tailed test:

Decision region:

Reject Null if ;

Zstatistic > Zcritical

Zcritical at α 0.02 = 2.05

Hence

Reject H0 : if Zstatistic > 2.05

Zstatistic = (p - p0) / sqrt((p0(1-p0))/n)

= (0.37 - 0.34) / sqrt((0.34(1-0.34))/900)

= 1.8999

1.8999 < 2.05

Zstatistic < Zcritical

Hence, we fail to reject the null ;

There is no significant evidence to support the claim that the percentage of residents who favor annexation is over 34%

Answer:

[tex]D = 1[/tex] --- Determinant

[tex]M = \frac{N+1}{2}th[/tex] --- Median

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]5m^2 - m = 0[/tex]

Required

Calculate the determinant (D)

This is calculated using

[tex]D = b^2 - 4ac[/tex]

In [tex]5m^2 - m = 0[/tex]

[tex]a = 5[/tex], [tex]b = -1[/tex] and [tex]c = 0[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]D = b^2 - 4ac[/tex]

[tex]D = (-1)^2 - 4 *5*0[/tex]

[tex]D = 1 - 0[/tex]

[tex]D = 1[/tex]

(b) Median Formula.

Median (M) is calculated using:

[tex]M = \frac{N+1}{2}th[/tex] item

Answer:

I suppose that we want to use the expression in number 4.

The expression we need to use is:

6/(1 + 1/3)

This is:

"the quotient between the number 6 and the number 1 and 1/3"

We could write a problem like:

"We have 1 and 1/3 pounds of apples, and we have 6 grams of caramel that we want to divide evenly between all the apples. How much caramel we will have in each pound of apples?"

Then we need to divide the total amount of caramel by the total amount of apples, this is:

(6gr)/(1 + 1/3 lb) = (6/(3/3 + 1/3  )) gr/lb = (6/ 4/3) gr/lb = 6*(3/4) gr/lb

= 18/4 gr/lb =  (16 + 2)/4 gt/lb = 16/4 gr/lb + 2/4gr/lb = 4 gr/lb + 1/2 gr/lb

= (4 and 1/2) gr/lb

Answer: 16 degrees obviously

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The baseball mitt was $37 and the ball was $7

Step-by-step explanation:

Let m represent the cost of the mitt and let b represent the cost of the ball

Set up a system of equations:

m + b = 44

m = 5b + 2

Solve by substitution by plugging in 5b + 2 as m in the first equation:

5b + 2 + b = 44

Solve for b:

6b + 2 = 44

6b = 42

b = 7

Plug in 7 into the first equation and solve for m:

m + b = 44

m + 7 = 44

m = 37

So, the baseball mitt was $37 and the ball was $7

Answer:

The word "of" in mathematical terms means multiplication. The word "is" means equal. This would be translated into 50% x 25% x X = or 0.50 x 0.25 x X =. 0.50 times 0.25 = 0.125. Putting 0.125 into a fraction, it would be 125/1000. Simplify this fraction to get 1/8. So, the answer would be A.

Answer:

$2,313,150,687,166.22 is the interest accrued.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps

Answer:

$2,313,150,687,166.22 is the interest

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps.

Answer:

its 6 cm, 8cm, and 10 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

i just took the quiz

Answer:

i dont get it

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer

200 DM

Hope this helps

Answer:

Kindly check explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Xbar = 0.3015 ; Rbar = 0.00154

USL = 0.295 ; LSL = 0.305

For a subgroup size of 3 ; k = 3 ; d2 = 1.693

The mean = xbar = 0.3015 mm

The standard deviation = Rbar / d2 = 0.00154 / 1.693 = 0.0009096

b) Suppose that parts below the LSL can be reworked, but parts above the USL must be scrapped. Estimate the proportion of scrap and rework produced by this process.

P(X < 0.295)

(x - mean) / standard deviation

(0.295 - 0.3015) / 0.0009096 = 0.00003

0.00003 should be reworked.

P(X > 0.305)

1 - P(X < 0.305)

(x - mean) / standard deviation

(0.305 - 0.3015) / 0.0009096 = 3.847

1 - P(Z < 3.847)

1 - 0.99994

= 0.00006

0.00006 should be reworked.

c) Suppose that the mean of this process can be reset by fairly simple adjustments. What value of the process mean would you recommend? Estimate the proportion of scrap and rework produced by the process at this new mean.

Recommended mean = 0.3000 mm

P(X < 0.295)

(x - mean) / standard deviation

(0.295 - 0.3000) / 0.0009096 = 0.00003

0.00003 should be reworked.

P(X > 0.305)

1 - P(X < 0.305)

(x - mean) / standard deviation

(0.305 - 0.3000) / 0.0009096 = 5.497

1 - P(Z < 5.497)

1 - 0.99997

= 0.00003

0.00003 should be reworked.

Answer:

540 towels

Step-by-step explanation:

cross multiply

towels time

4 120

18 x

4x=120×18

x = 540