Jack has 7 yards of rope. He wants to cut it into pieces of different sizes. Jack needs 84 inches of rope to tie some packages and 4 feet of rope for another project. Does Jack have enough rope? Explain. Pls help

Answer:The quantity of grocer of price $1.40 is 45 pounds

The quantity of grocer of price 40 cents is 55 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

Let The quantity of one grocer = x pound

Let The quantity of other grocer = y pound

The selling price of x grocer = 40 cents per pound

The selling price of y grocer = $ 1.40 per pound = 1.40 × 100 = 140 cents

Total quantity = 100 pounds

Total price of both grocer = 85 cents

According to question

x + y = 100                        .........A

And

40 × x + 140 y = 85 × 100

Or, 40 x + 140 y = 8500         ........B

Solving eq A and eq b

(40 x + 140 y) - 40 × ( x + y ) = 8500 - 40 × 100

Or, (40 x - 40 x) + (140 y - 40 y) = 8500 - 4000

or, 0 + 100 y = 4500

∴  y =

i.e  y = 45 pounds

So, The quantity of grocer of price $1.40 = y = 45 pounds

Again

Put the vaue of y in eq A

x + y = 100

i.e x = 100 - y

or, x = 100 - 45

∴   x = 55 pounds

So, The quantity of grocer of price 40 cents = x = 55 pounds

Hence, The quantity of grocer of price $1.40 is 45 pounds

And The quantity of grocer of price 40 cents is 55 pounds  Answer

The magnitude of the earthquake with an amplitude of 100,000 is 2 on the Richter scale

Magnitude: The magnitude of an earthquake is a measure of the amount of energy released during the earthquake. It is typically determined using a logarithmic scale called the Richter scale or other similar scales like the moment magnitude scale (MMS), surface wave magnitude (Ms), or body wave magnitude (Mb). The Richter scale is based on the amplitude of the largest seismic wave recorded on a seismographs, and each increase of one unit on the scale corresponds to a ten-fold increase in the amplitude of the seismic waves and a 32-fold increase in the amount of energy released.

Amplitude: The amplitude of an earthquake is the size of the seismic waves that are generated by the earthquake. It is measured in microns (millionths of a meter) and is recorded on a seismographs. The amplitude of seismic waves can vary greatly depending on the distance from the earthquake's epicenter and the geological structure of the surrounding area.

The magnitude of an earthquake is a measure of the amount of energy released during the earthquake, and is typically determined using a logarithmic scale called the Richter scale.

The formula for calculating the magnitude of an earthquake based on its amplitude is:

Magnitude = log10 (Amplitude) - 3

where the amplitude is measured in microns.

Assuming the amplitude of the earthquake is 100,000 microns, we can calculate its magnitude as:

Magnitude = log10 (100,000) - 3

Magnitude = 5 - 3

Magnitude = 2

Therefore, the magnitude of the earthquake with an amplitude of 100,000 is 2 on the Richter scale.

Learn more about  Seismographs here

https://brainly.com/question/13962902

#SPJ1

Answer:

-16²+1,000 > 300  [After an edit in the original expression, as noted below).

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation d = -16² +1,000 tells us the height above ground, d, of the object after t seconds.  When t = 0 seconds, the ball has not been dropped yet, but the equation tells us that d = 1,000 at t = 0.  That means the object starts at 1,000 feet above ground.

We want the time it takes for the object to reach any height greater than 300 feet above ground.  This is a tad (metric for just a tiny bit) unexpected, since even at time of 0 the object is greater than 1,000 feet.

Looking at the answer options, note that the left side of the inequalities is -16^2+100.  I will assume the 4th option has a typo:  the f^2.  It should read the same as the others.  

      -16^2+100 is the distance, d.  So to help us think this through, let's rephrase the answer options in terms of distance, d:

1)    d<300

2)   d≤300

3)   d≥300

4)   d>300

   The question asks "We want the time it takes for the object to reach any height greater than 300 feet above ground."

Option 4 says d>300, or height greater than 300.  That is the inequality that matches the question.  [Note:  It did not say greater than or equal to (option 3).]

Optiοn B. is cοrrect, the result οf substituting fοr y in the given equatiοns is x - 3 =x² + 2x - 4.

Equivalent expressiοns are expressiοns that wοrk the same even thοugh they lοοk different. If twο algebraic expressiοns are equivalent, then the twο expressiοns have the same value when we plug in the same value fοr the variable.

Tο substitute fοr y in the secοnd equatiοn, we can replace y with its equivalent expressiοn in terms οf x frοm the first equatiοn, which gives us:

x - 3 = x² + 2x - 4

This is option B.

Optiοn A is incοrrect because it substitutes y fοr its expressiοn in terms οf x in the wrοng equatiοn.

Optiοn C is incοrrect because it subtracts (x-3) instead οf adding it tο the secοnd equatiοn.

Optiοn D is incοrrect because it sets the expressiοn fοr y in the first equatiοn equal tο x² instead οf the expressiοn fοr y in the secοnd equatiοn.

Hence, οptiοn B. is cοrrect, the result οf substituting fοr y in the given equatiοns is x - 3 = x² + 2x - 4.

To learn more about equivalent expression visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

Complete question:

What is result of substituting for y in the bottom equation?

y = x – 3,

y = x² + 2x – 4

A. y=(x-3)²+2(x-3)-4

B. x-3=x²+2x-4

C. y=x²+2x-4-(x-3)

D. (x-3)=x²

If the screen door spring has a spring constant of 188 N/m, then the force it exert is 54.9 N .

The force exerted by the screen door spring can be calculated using Hooke's law,

The Hooke's Law states that the force exerted by a spring is directly proportional to its spring constant and the amount it is stretched.

The formula for "Hooke's-law" is ⇒ F = kx

Where F is = force exerted by spring, k is = spring constant, and x is = amount spring is stretched.

In this case , the spring constant(k) = 188 , the distance stretched(x) = 292m ;

Substituting the values,

We get,

⇒ F = (188 N/m)(0.292 m)

⇒ F = 54.896 N

⇒ F ≈ 54.9N

Therefore, The force exerted by the screen door spring is approximately 54.9 N.

Learn more about Force here

https://brainly.com/question/16262362

#SPJ4

Answer:

y = - [tex]\frac{5}{2}[/tex] x - 1

Step-by-step explanation:

the equation of a line in slope- intercept form is

y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept )

calculate m using the slope formula

m = [tex]\frac{y_{2}-y_{1} }{x_{2}-x_{1} }[/tex]

with (x₁, y₁ ) = (- 4, 9) and (x₂, y₂ ) = (2, - 6) ← 2 ordered pairs from the table

m = [tex]\frac{-6-9}{2-(-4)}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{-15}{2+4}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{-15}{6}[/tex] = - [tex]\frac{5}{2}[/tex]

the line crosses the y- axis at point (0, - 1 ), ordered pair from table, then

c = - 1

y = - [tex]\frac{5}{2}[/tex] x - 1 ← equation of line

Absolutely, Jada's response is right. A square is a quadrilateral with four equal-length sides. A quadrilateral is a square if all four sides measure 5 cm.

Unfortunately, there is no alternative form Jada could have drawn that meets the requirement of all four sides measuring 5 cm. Every other quadrilateral with four equal-length sides is likewise a square. If Jada had drawn a quadrilateral with one or more sides of varying lengths, the specified criterion would not have been met. As a result, the only design Jada could have sketched that meets the requirement of having all four sides measure 5 cm is a square. It is worthwhile to investigate the properties of quadrilaterals and how they connect to the conditions presented in the problem. A quadrilateral is a four-sided polygon. Quadrilaterals come in a variety of shapes, including squares, rectangles, parallelograms, trapezoids, and kites. Certain quadrilaterals have unique qualities, such as opposing sides that are parallel or all angles that are right angles. The criterion in the provided problem is that all four sides of the quadrilateral measure 5 cm.

learn more about quadrilateral  here:

https://brainly.com/question/29934440

#SPJ4

Answer:  C is our answer.

The first thing that we can do is divide the known number of books into the price that they sold for.

Our equation would be 89.25 divided by 7, which is 12.75. This means that one single book is 12.75.  We can look at the charts and point out where one book is 12.75, that is both A and D. While Chart B and C have 7 books for 89.25 which we know is correct.

Lets look at chart D.The next part we can solve is the price of 2 books. 12.75 x 2 is 25.50,  so we can mark question B incorrect since two books are 25.50 not 13.75.Chart B is incorrect because 14 books is double 7, so it should be twice as much as 89.25, which we should know 90 dollars is not two times as much 80. Chart A is incorrect because 11 x 12.75 is 140.25, while the chart reads as 22.75.

Now lets look at chart C. Next we can solve the price of 8 books. 8 x 12.75 is 102. Then we solve  for 9 books. 12.75 x 9 is 114.75, which means that C is correct.

I hope this helped & Good Luck <3!!

Answer:

It depends on the values of x and y. If x is positive and y is negative, then option A (x + y) would have a negative value. If y is greater than x, then option B (x - y) would have a negative value. If either x or y (or both) is negative, then option C (x*y) could have a negative value. Option D (x/y) could also have a negative value if x is negative and y is positive, or if both x and y are negative.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

B because it has subtraction

a) 1/2, b) 1/4, c) 3/13, d) 7/26 (fraction of black and face cards) in a traditional Western pack of playing cards.

A traditional Western pack of playing cards consists of four suits: Hearts (colored red), Diamonds (colored red), Spades (colored black), and Clubs (colored black). Each suit has 13 cards: Ace, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Jack, Queen, and King.

a) To find the fraction of the playing cards that are red, we need to add up the number of red cards and divide by the total number of cards in the deck. There are two red suits, Hearts and Diamonds, and each has 13 cards. So there are 26 red cards in total. Since there are 52 cards in a deck, the fraction of red cards is 26/52 or 1/2.

b) To find the fraction of cards that are Diamonds, we simply divide the number of Diamonds (13) by the total number of cards (52). This gives us a fraction of 13/52 or 1/4.

c) To find the fraction of face cards, we need to add up the number of face cards and divide by the total number of cards in the deck. In each suit, there are three face cards: King, Queen, and Jack. So there are 12 face cards in each deck (4 suits x 3 face cards per suit). Therefore, there are 12/52 or 3/13 face cards in the deck.

d) To find the fraction of black and face cards, we need to count the number of black cards and the number of face cards that are also black. There are two black suits, Spades and Clubs, and each has 13 cards. So there are total 26 black cards. Of these 26 cards, there are 12 face cards (King, Queen, and Jack) which are not black, leaving 14 black cards which are face cards. Therefore, the fraction of black and face cards is 14/52 or 7/26.

Learn more about fraction here:

https://brainly.com/question/8482939

#SPJ4

The cumulative distribution function gives us the probability that the random variable is less than or equal to a given value.

The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of a continuous random variable x is a function which gives the probability that the random variable x is less than or equal to a given value x. Mathematically it is expressed as:

[tex]F(x) = P(X ≤ x)[/tex]

The calculation of the cumulative distribution function is done by integrating the probability density function (PDF) from the lower limit to the given value x. Thus,

[tex]F(x) = ∫-∞ x f(u) du[/tex]

Where f(u) is the probability density function.

For example, if we have a continuous random variable x with probability density function f(x) = x2, then the cumulative distribution function [tex]F(x) = ∫-∞ x x2 du = 1/3x3 + c.[/tex]

Thus, It is a powerful tool for analysing the probability distribution of a continuous random variable.

Learn more about cumulative distribution function here:

https://brainly.com/question/30402457

#SPJ4

Complete question:

What is the cumulative distribution function for a continuous random variable x?

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The domain is found by setting the denominator equal to 0 and solving for y. This value of y gives you the values that cause the denominator to go to 0, which is a problem. In this rational expression, there are no real numbers that cause the denominator to go to 0, so the domain is all real numbers.

The total percentage increase in the investor's stock account is 7.95% (rounded to the nearest tenth).

What is the percentage?

A percentage is a number or ratio expressed as a fraction of 100. It is often denoted using the percent sign, "%", although the abbreviations "pct.", "pct" and sometimes "pc" is also used. A percentage is a dimensionless number; it has no unit of measurement.

To calculate the total percentage increase in the investor's stock account, we first need to calculate the new values of the stocks in Company A and Company B after the increase.

The new value of the stock in Company A is:

[tex]4500 + (5 \times 4500) = $4725[/tex]

The new value of the stock in Company B is:

[tex]3900 + (11 \times 3900) = 4339[/tex]

The total value of the investor's stock account after the increase is:

$4725 + $4339 = $9064

To calculate the percentage increase in the investor's stock account, we need to find the difference between the new total value and the original total value, and then divide that difference by the original total value:

($9064 - $8400) / $8400 = 0.0795

We then multiply this decimal by 100 to get the percentage increase:

0.0795 x 100 = 7.95%

Therefore, the total percentage increase in the investor's stock account is 7.95% (rounded to the nearest tenth).

To know more about percentage visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24304697

#SPJ1

For the given elementary chemical reaction, the solution to the question is: C = a^2 * (1-t^2/400(1-a))

The question asks about calculating the concentration of C in a chemical reaction. Given that the reaction equation is as follows: A + B → C The rate of reaction can be expressed as: dc/dt = k[A][B] Where, k is the rate constant[A] is the concentration of reactant A in moles/L[B] is the concentration of reactant B in moles/L, c is the concentration of product C in moles/L

The initial concentration of A and B is [A] = a moles/L, [B] = b moles/L Let r be the rate of reaction, i.e. r = dc/dt Thus, using the equation r = k[A][B], we get r = k(a)(b)Now, we can write a differential equation for the concentration of C as follows: dc/dt = r, with initial concentration of C as 0 moles/L∴ dc/dt = kab

Substituting r = k(a)(b) in the equation, we get dc/dt = kabdc/db = kab*dt Differentiating both sides, we get, ln(C) = kab*t + C where C is a constant, ln(C) = ln(a^2) = 2ln(a) = C When a = b, the concentration of C will be maximum at t = (1/k)(ln(a)).

Thus the concentration of C as a function of time (when a = b) is given by C = a^2 * (1-t^2/2)If [C] = a after 20 seconds, then using the equation, we get a = a^2 * (1 - 20^2 * k^2/2)Therefore, 1 = a * (1 - 200k^2) Solving this equation for k, we get, k = ± sqrt[(1-a)/200a^2] For the positive value of k, the concentration of C as a function of time is given by C = a^2 * (1-t^2/400(1-a)).

To know more about elementary chemical reaction, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31022212#

#SPJ11

The equation of the given graph is: y = cosine (x + pi)

By convention, the cosine function like most other trigonometric functions has a period of 2π.

Since, the parental function is y = cos x, which has y-intercept at y = 1, and x-intercept at π/2.

From observation, the function showed in the graph attached has y-intercept at y = -1 and x-intercept at π/2.

This can be interpreted to mean that the function has been translated leftwards π units.

Ultimately, the function that belongs to this graph is; y = cosine (x + pi)

Read more on cosine graphs:

https://brainly.com/question/17075439

Answer: D. y = cosine (x + pi)

Step-by-step explanation:

The equivalent expressions of [tex]x^3[/tex] are[tex]\frac{(x ^ 6)}{(x ^ 3)}[/tex]and [tex]\frac{(x^{-3}) }{(x^{-6}) }[/tex], the expressions [tex]\frac{(x^{30}) }{(x^{10})}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{(x ^ 4) ^ 2)}{x ^ 2}[/tex] are not equivalent to [tex]x^3[/tex].

What are equivalent expressions?

Equivalent expressions are different algebraic expressions that have the same value when evaluated for a particular set of variables.

The equivalent expressions  [tex]x^3[/tex] are:

[tex]\frac{(x ^ 4) ^ 2)}{x ^ 2}[/tex] : This expression can be simplified as follows:

=[tex]\frac{(x ^ 4) ^ 2)}{x ^ 2}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{(x ^ 8)}{(x ^ 2) }[/tex]

=[tex]x^{8-2}[/tex]

= [tex]x^6[/tex]

[tex]\frac{(x ^ 6)}{(x ^ 3)}[/tex] : This expression can be simplified as follows:

=[tex]\frac{(x ^ 6)}{(x ^ 3)}[/tex]

= [tex]x^{6-3}[/tex]

=[tex]x^3[/tex]

[tex]\frac{(x^{30}) }{(x^{10})}[/tex] : This expression can be simplified as follows:

=[tex]\frac{(x^{30}) }{(x^{10})}[/tex]

=[tex]x^{30-10}[/tex]

=[tex]x^{20}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{(x^{-3}) }{(x^{-6}) }[/tex] : This expression can be simplified as follows:

=[tex]\frac{(x^{-3}) }{(x^{-6}) }[/tex]

=[tex]x^{-3-(-6)}[/tex]

=[tex]x^{-3+6}[/tex]

=[tex]x^{3}[/tex]

Therefore, the equivalent expressions of [tex]x^3[/tex] are[tex]\frac{(x ^ 6)}{(x ^ 3)}[/tex]and [tex]\frac{(x^{-3}) }{(x^{-6}) }[/tex] , the expressions [tex]\frac{(x^{30}) }{(x^{10})}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{(x ^ 4) ^ 2)}{x ^ 2}[/tex] are not equivalent to [tex]x^3[/tex].

To know more about equivalent expressions visit:

brainly.com/question/17499155

#SPJ1

Answer:

-25

Step-by-step explanation:

simplification using BODMAS

[tex]-5 * 4 + -5[/tex]
-20 - 5
= -25

Find CD:

Let,

[tex]r_1[/tex] be a radius of Circle A

[tex]r_2[/tex] be a radius of Circle B

Given:

[tex]r=4cm.[/tex]

Circumference: [tex]2\pi r[/tex]

[tex]2\pi r_1=30[/tex]

[tex]r_1=\dfrac{15}{\pi }[/tex]

[tex]CD=D_1+D_2[/tex]

[tex]=2r_1+2rx_2[/tex]

[tex]=2\times(\dfrac{15}{\pi })+2\times4[/tex]

[tex]CD=17.55cm.[/tex]

To learn more about the circle, refer to:

brainly.com/question/26594685

Therefore , the solution of the given problem of area comes out to be

A = 16 is the equation that accurately depicts how to calculate the sector's area.

Its total size can be determined by figuring out how much space is required to completely cover the outside. The immediate surroundings are taken into consideration when calculating the surface of a trapezoidal shape. The total measurements of something are determined by its surface area. A cuboid's capacity for internal water is determined by the sum of the borders that link all of it's six rectangle edges.

Here,

The formula for calculating a circle's sector's area is:

=> A = (θ/360) x πr²

where A is the sector's area, is its central angle measurement, and r is the circle's radius.

Since the radius is 8 cm and the central angle is 90 degrees in this instance, we can reduce by plugging in these values:

=> A = (90/360) x π(8²)

=>  A = (1/4) x π(64)

=>  A = π(16)

=>  A = 16π

A = 16 is the equation that accurately depicts how to calculate the sector's area.

The answer will be given in radius squared units, in this case, cm2.

To know more about area visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2835293

#SPJ1

Option D. The correct calculation of the area of the sector is      [tex]A=(\frac{90}{360}) * (\pi 8^{2} )[/tex]

An area of the sector is the portion of the area of a circle that is enclosed by two radii and an arc. The area of a sector can be found using the formula:

A = (θ/360)πr²

where A is the area of the sector, θ is the central angle of the sector (in degrees), π is a mathematical constant approximately equal to 3.14, and r is the radius of the circle.

Given, the radius is 8 cm and the central angle is 90° in this instance, put all these values:

[tex]A=(\frac{90}{360}) * \pi (8^{2} )[/tex]

or we can write down, [tex]A=(\frac{90}{360}) * (\pi 8^{2} )[/tex]

To know more about area, visit:

brainly.com/question/2835293

#SPJ1

Answer:

£602.84 in New York

Step-by-step explanation:

London Cost:

Converting pound to dollars:

£800 * 1.41 = $1128

Paris cost:

Converting euro to pounds:

€880/1.16 = £759

Converting pound to dollars again:

£759 * 1.41 = $1070

New york cost:

$850

The lowest price is in new york which is:

$850/1.41 = £602.84

Feel free to mark this as brainliest (I'm one brainliest off 50 so please help out