Answer:
From the Library and Archives Canada website, the Royal Proclamation of 1763: This is a digital copy of the original Royal Proclamation of 1763, which was issued by King George III of Great Britain after the Seven Years' War ended. The proclamation set up the borders of British North America and tried to stop colonists from moving into Native American land. The language, formatting, and signatures of the original document are all clear and accurate in the digital version.
The Library of Congress website has the Journals of the Continental Congress: The text of the Royal Proclamation of 1763, as it appeared in the Pennsylvania Gazette on October 27, 1763, is part of this collection of primary sources. This document gives an idea of how colonists at the time reacted to the proclamation and how it spread throughout the colonies. There are also debates and discussions about the Royal Proclamation in the Journals of the Continental Congress. These can give you more information about the document and what it means.
Due to brainlies policy I cannot provide links. But I am sure you can find these sources now with the given context.
What factor led to the rise of the Kingdom of Kush?
Archery was invented.
Meroe became the capital.
Napata became independent.
Kushi tes traded more with their neighbors.
Answer:
Explanation:
The factor that led to the rise of the Kingdom of Kush was "Napata became independent."
help please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
no 4 is the answer please
what are shares?
And investors in historical term
Answer:
Explanation:
Shares, also known as stocks, are units of ownership in a company. When you buy a share of a company's stock, you become a part owner of that company, and you have a claim on a portion of its assets and profits.
In historical terms, investors have been around for centuries. In the early days, investors were wealthy individuals who had the means to provide financial backing to new businesses or ventures. This often took the form of lending money to the business, or buying shares in the company in exchange for a portion of the profits.
Over time, as the stock market developed and became more accessible to the general public, anyone with the means to do so could invest in companies by buying shares of stock. Today, investing in the stock market is one of the most common ways for people to build wealth over the long term.
hoped this helped:)
All
1) If cost-benefit consequentialism is the ethic of capitalism, is there a way to save it from itself? that is, these two, seem to justify selfishness by drawing th
circle of who counts tightly around myself. Is that even ethical? If not, which other ethic should our economy be guided by?
2) Mill thinks some pleasures are better pleasures than other pleasures. Is this true? Explain, and give an example
1. Other ethics that could be used are virtue ethics, deontological ethics.
2. Some pleasures have more quality than others, and are therefore better.
The Ethics Cost-benefit consequentialism is not necessarily the exclusive ethic of capitalism, but it is often associated with it. This approach to ethics focuses on the outcomes or consequences of actions and seeks to maximize the benefits while minimizing the costs. While this approach can provide some benefits, it can also lead to a narrow focus on self-interest and short-term gains at the expense of others and the environment.To address this, alternative ethical frameworks such as virtue ethics or deontological ethics can be used to guide economic decisions.
Virtue ethics emphasizes the development of moral character and emphasizes the importance of virtues such as compassion, fairness, and responsibility.
Deontological ethics emphasizes adherence to moral rules and duties, regardless of the consequences. These alternative frameworks may provide a broader perspective on economic decision-making that takes into account the well-being of all stakeholders, including the environment and future generations.
Mill believed that some pleasures are better than others based on their quality, not just their quantity. He argued that intellectual or higher pleasures, such as the enjoyment of art, literature, or philosophy, are superior to lower pleasures, such as physical pleasures like eating, drinking, or sex. Mill believed that higher pleasures are more valuable because they require a greater level of development, education, and sophistication to appreciate.This view is controversial and has been criticized for being elitist and paternalistic. Some argue that pleasure is subjective and that it is not possible to make objective distinctions between higher and lower pleasures. Others argue that pleasure should not be the only consideration in ethical decision-making and that other factors such as justice, fairness, and equality should also be taken into account. Ultimately, whether some pleasures are better than others is a matter of debate and depends on individual perspectives and values.
Learn more about ethics here https://brainly.com/question/13969108
Which of the following best describes the relationship between the italicized sentence
Answer: call attention to a serious problem. which of the following best describes the relationship between the first and second sentences of the passage.
If the government seizes property under eminent domain and gives the property for personal use, how has the Fifth Amendment been violated?
1. It does not violate the Fifth Amendment according to the “Takings Clause.”
2. It does not violate the Fifth Amendment because it is due process.
3. It violates the Fifth Amendment because the federal government does not have eminent domain power; that is solely the power of the states.
4. It violates the Fifth Amendment because the property, in this case, must be used for a public good or service.
Explanation:
The power of the government through the use of eminent domain, to take private property and convert it into public use, is referred to as a taking. The Fifth Amendment provides that the government may only exercise this power if they provide just compensation to the property owners.
Hopefully this helps! :)
How did the Versailles treaty help cause ww2?
Be sure to give me:
-A claim that answers the question
-Evidence (a direct quote or data) from one source that supports this claim
-Reasoning explaining how this evidence supports your claim
-Evidence (a direct quote or data) from a second source that supports this claim
-Reasoning explaining how this evidence supports your claim.
Answer:
Claim: The Versailles Treaty helped cause World War II by punishing Germany with harsh reparations, territorial losses, and military limitations that fueled resentment and instability.
Evidence from Source 1 (History.com): "The Treaty of Versailles punished Germany with massive territorial losses, military restrictions, economic reparations, and a guilty verdict that led to political turmoil and resentment."
Reasoning: The treaty's harsh terms left Germany humiliated and economically devastated, fueling anger and frustration among Germans who saw the treaty as unfair and punitive. This resentment led to political instability and the rise of extremist parties, such as the Nazi Party, who capitalized on the public's anger and promised to restore Germany's power and prestige.
Evidence from Source 2 (Britannica): "The Treaty of Versailles, by imposing punitive territorial, military, and economic provisions on Germany, laid the groundwork for the rise of fascist leader Adolf Hitler and the outbreak of World War II."
Reasoning: The treaty's punitive measures undermined Germany's fragile democracy and allowed extremist groups, such as the Nazi Party, to gain power and support. Hitler, who rose to power in part by exploiting the public's anger over the treaty, used Germany's economic and political instability to justify his aggressive foreign policy and eventual invasion of neighboring countries.
Answer:
Claim: The Versailles Treaty helped cause World War II.
Evidence from source 1: "The Treaty of Versailles, which ended World War I, was drafted to prevent future wars by making Germany pay for the damage it had caused. The treaty, however, ended up creating resentment and economic problems in Germany that eventually led to the rise of Adolf Hitler and the start of World War II." (History.com, "Treaty of Versailles")
Reasoning: This evidence supports the claim that the Versailles Treaty helped cause World War II by showing that the treaty created conditions in Germany that were conducive to the rise of Hitler and the Nazi party, who ultimately started the war. The economic burdens placed on Germany by the treaty caused significant unrest and instability, which Hitler was able to exploit to gain power.
Evidence from source 2: "The Treaty of Versailles was a harsh treaty that required Germany to pay for the damages caused by the war, give up land and disarmament, and accept full responsibility for starting the war. The German people felt humiliated and resentful, which made them more susceptible to the propaganda of extremist political groups." (The National WWII Museum, "Treaty of Versailles")
Reasoning: This evidence supports the claim that the Versailles Treaty helped cause World War II by demonstrating that the treaty created a sense of humiliation and resentment in Germany that made the population more receptive to extremist political ideologies. The harsh terms of the treaty made the German people feel unfairly punished and contributed to a sense of nationalism that Hitler and other extremist groups were able to exploit.
Overall, these sources show that the Versailles Treaty played a significant role in creating the conditions that led to World War II. The treaty's harsh terms and economic burdens created resentment and instability in Germany, which Hitler and other extremist groups were able to exploit to gain power and ultimately start the war.
which of the following was not a reaction to the battle of little big horn?
Answer: The Battle of the Little Bighorn, also called Custer's Last Stand, marked the most decisive Native American victory and the worst U.S. Army defeat in the long Plains Indian War. The demise of Custer and his men outraged many white Americans and confirmed their image of the Indians as wild and bloodthirsty.
discuss three ways people decide how to vote. There are several methods or influences listed, pick three and discuss how they impact voters.
The three ways people decide how to vote is through:
Political IdeologyPersonal Characteristics of the CandidateParty AffiliationWhat are the discusion on how they impact voters?There are many different factors that can influence how people decide to vote in elections. Here are three common ways that people often make decisions about who to vote for:
Political Ideology: One of the most important factors that can influence how people vote is their political ideology. This refers to a set of beliefs and values that individuals hold about the role of government, the economy, social issues, and other political issues. People who identify as conservative, for example, may prioritize individual rights, limited government, and a free market economy.
Personal Characteristics of the Candidate: Another factor that can influence voting decisions is the personal characteristics of the candidates themselves. For example, voters may consider a candidate's experience, leadership skills, communication abilities, or personal charisma.
Party Affiliation: Many people base their voting decisions on their party affiliation. This means that they support candidates who are members of the same political party that they belong to. Party affiliation can be influenced by many factors, such as family upbringing, personal values, or geographic location.
Learn more about vote at:
https://brainly.com/question/21910013
#SPJ1
Which of the following is one of the Five Pillars of Islam?
Never telling a lie
Giving to the poor and needy
Making the hajj to Medina
Fasting during Eid al-Fitr
Ancient Greece Test answers
Answer:
Who founded the Persian Empire? Cyrus
the Battle of Salamis was a decisive battle becauseXerxes now returned to Persia with all his army and navy and left the Greeks alone.Due to a limited amount of fertile farmland, the Greeksconquer other areas and established colonies where farmland was plentifulThe turing point of the Battle of Thermopylae for the Persians waswhen the Spartans were surround when a Greek traitor told the Persians of a mountain passThe education of boys in ancient Sparta centered around prepartion to becomesoldiersThe Battle of Marathon was significant for the Greeks becasueIt was a moral victory for the Greeks, they realized that Persians were no longer unbeatableIn response to the Persian Wars, the Greek city-states formedan alliance called the Delian LeagueMycenaens wage a war that is the basis for the story of theTrojan WarWho fought in the Battle of Marathon?Athens and Persian ArmiesAncient Spartan society was centered around which of the following?military preparednessWhich form of political power did women in ancient Sparta posses?the right to become citizensMinoans lived during this ageBronze Age
Explanation:
Answer:what test is it?
Explanation:
What historical factors (religious, scientific, political, philosophical, personal, social, et al) influenced The Galileo Affair? In other words, what were some of the historical factors that led the Catholic Church to take an interest in Galileo and which led to his eventual trial in 1633? Give three historical examples and explain their significance.
Answer:
The Galileo Affair was influenced by several historical factors, including:
Religious: The Catholic Church's interpretation of the Bible as a literal account of God's creation clashed with Galileo's heliocentric views, which challenged the geocentric views of the Church. This conflict created a tension between the Church and Galileo, as he was seen as a threat to the Church's authority.
Scientific: Galileo's observations and experiments with the telescope challenged the Aristotelian views that had been widely accepted for centuries. The Church saw Galileo's work as a threat to their authority and the traditional worldview they had upheld for so long.
Philosophical: The Renaissance and the Age of Enlightenment had fostered a new spirit of inquiry and intellectual curiosity, which challenged the traditional dogmas of the Church. Galileo's work was seen as part of this movement, and his ideas threatened to undermine the authority of the Church in matters of science and philosophy.
These factors contributed to the Church's interest in Galileo and his eventual trial in 1633. The trial was a result of a long-standing conflict between Galileo and the Church over his ideas and the authority of the Church. Ultimately, the trial and its aftermath had significant implications for the relationship between science and religion and the role of the Church in shaping the intellectual and scientific landscape of the time.
Hope this helps you! Sorry if it doesn't. :]
Why do you think U.S. Secretary of State John Hay called this conflict a “splendid little war?” (HINT: How did the U.S. benefit from the Spanish-American War?)
The Spanish-American War was dubbed the "splendid little conflict" by Secretary of State John Hay. It was short—only a few months long—and relatively bloodless because the US lost more soldiers to illness than to hostilities.
What benefits did the US receive as a result of the Spanish-American War?Representatives from Spain and the United States signed a peace agreement in Paris on December 10, 1898, recognizing Cuba's independence, transferring Puerto Rico and Guam to the United States, and allowing the winner to pay $20 million to Spain to purchase the Philippines Islands.
The Spanish were compelled to surrender their claims to Cuba as a result of the United States' victory in the war, and to cede control of Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines to the Americans. Hawaii, an autonomous state, was also annexed by the US during the conflict.
Learn more about Spanish-American War: https://brainly.com/question/2827989
#SPJ1
The 12th Amendment:
Question 47 options:
a)
ensures separate votes for the president and vice president.
b)
makes the Speaker of the House president if no one receives a majority of electoral votes.
c)
makes the highest electoral vote getter president and the second place vote-getter vice president
d)
lets the Senate choose the president and the House the vice president if no one receives a majority of electoral votes.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
How did the Aztec need for victims for sacrifice lead to problems controlling the empire? Think about: reactions of the conquered peoples, and changes in army tactics.
The Aztec need for victims for sacrifice created resentment among the conquered peoples and resulted in frequent uprisings, which made it difficult to control the empire. To counter this, the Aztecs had to shift their military tactics towards maintaining a more significant standing army to quell rebellions.
Examine the scenario below. Determine the goal the responding international agency is trying to achieve if they intervene in this issue.
Two European countries are at war, and are using their navies to attack one another in an area in which cruise ships frequently travel. NATO has decided to intervene, to help protect the cruise passengers from being attacked.
Human Rights
Spread Democracy
National Security
Economic Growth
The goal the responding international agency is trying to achieve in this scenario is National Security.
What is National security?National security is the government wants to protect society from disruption caused by a disaster or crisis. It examines threats, their prevention and disaster response through its National Security Strategy.
NATO's decision to intervene in the conflict between two European countries in order to protect cruise passengers from being attacked suggests that the agency's primary objective is to ensure the safety and security of civilians and to prevent the escalation of violence in the region.
This is consistent with the goal of national security, which involves protecting a country's citizens and interests from internal and external threats. By intervening in the conflict, NATO is seeking to promote stability and security in the region and to prevent the conflict from spilling over into other areas or causing wider instability.
Learn more about National Security at:https://brainly.com/question/29553303
#SPJ1
Describe the growth of the first party system in the United States
From about 1792 and 1824, the United States had a political party structure known as the First Party System. It included two national parties vying for power in the states, the federal government, and the president.
What does becoming president mean?The office of president of the U.S. also: the American governmental institution encompassing the office of president and other accompanying administrative and policy-making agencies.: the term during which a president occupies office. 3.: the conduct or duties of the presider.
What does it mean to be in the presidency?
He has declared that he's running for office, which is the duty of being president in general. She easily defeated her rival for the presidency. There are now just two leading contenders for the presidency.
To know more about presidency visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14008034
#SPJ1
Which of the following was a condition Southern states needed to meet before they could be readmitted to the Union under the Reconstruction Act of 1867?
Answer:
I don't know
Explanation:
need points
The cοrrect answer is οptiοn A: They had tο enfranchise black men.
Why they had tο enfranchise black men?The reasοn they had tο free them in οrder tο rejοin the uniοn, is because the civil war was fοught in οrder tο enfοrce the emancipatiοn prοclamatiοn. The pοint οf the emancipatiοn prοclamatiοn was tο free all slaves in the sοuthern states. That is why they had tο enfranchise black men tο rejοin.
The American Civil War, alsο referred tο by οther names, lasted frοm April 12, 1861, tο May 26, 1865. The cοnflict invοlved the Uniοn ("the Nοrth") and the Cοnfederacy ("the Sοuth"), the latter οf which was made up οf seceding states.
Learn more about civil war
https://brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ1
Complete question:
Which of the following was a condition Southern states needed to meet before they could be readmitted to the Union under the Reconstruction Act of 1867?
OA. They had to enfranchise black men.
ОВ. They had to enfranchise women.
OC. They had to institute a poll tax.
OD. They had to institute a literacy test.
Please Help Me ASAP! there are 4 images, I need help with all the questions on each of the images. Please help me. I need a real answer, FAST! Offering 50 points and brainliest to someone with an amazing answer! Help me!
A typical Chinese person during Mongol rule in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries would have experienced a period of unrest and upheaval.
What is fourteenth centuries ?The fourteenth century was a period of immense changes in the world. It was a time of exploration and discovery, when the boundaries of knowledge were pushed outward and new ideas and innovations began to emerge. In Europe, the Hundred Years' War between England and France began, and the Black Death ravaged the continent. In China, the Ming dynasty began and the Great Wall of China was constructed. In the Middle East, the Ottoman Empire expanded, and the Mamluk Sultanate was established in Egypt.
To learn more about fourteenth centuries
https://brainly.com/question/29315505
#SPJ1
Imagine you are a Grade 11 history teacher, during the third term,you are dealing with the theme of nationalism in the Middle east.Your class consists of diverse group with learners from different religions, including Christianity,Islam and Judiciam.Create a lesson plan on "nationalisms". origins of Arab nationalism and Jewish nationalism.
Important notes:
This topic can be controversial.
Include the LTSM's, worksheet, assignments etc that you refer in your lesson plan.Be sure to provide as much as detail as possible,do not just mention the teaching tool,provide context and information on the application.
Answer:
Lesson Plan: Nationalism in the Middle East - Origins of Arab Nationalism and Jewish Nationalism
Grade level: 11th
Subject: History
Objective: Students will be able to identify and analyze the origins of Arab nationalism and Jewish nationalism in the Middle East, and understand the impact of nationalism on the region.
LTSMs:
PowerPoint presentation
Handouts
Videos
Group discussion
Map activity
Writing assignments
Introduction (15 minutes):
Begin by asking students what they know about nationalism, and how it has impacted the world throughout history.
Provide a brief overview of nationalism in the Middle East, and explain that the focus of the lesson will be on the origins of Arab nationalism and Jewish nationalism.
Body (60 minutes):
Use a PowerPoint presentation to provide a detailed history of Arab nationalism and Jewish nationalism, including their origins and major events and figures associated with each movement.
Use handouts to supplement the presentation, and provide students with additional information and analysis.
Show videos that provide further insight into the history and impact of nationalism in the Middle East.
Break students into small groups to discuss the information they have learned, and to ask questions and share their thoughts.
Have students participate in a map activity that shows the geographic spread of nationalism in the Middle East.
Assign writing assignments that ask students to analyze the impact of nationalism on the region, and to provide their own opinions on the topic.
Conclusion (15 minutes):
Have a group discussion where students can share their writing assignments and their thoughts on the topic.
Summarize the lesson by emphasizing the key takeaways, and provide resources for students who want to continue learning about the topic.
Assessment:
Assess students' participation in group discussions and activities.
Grade written assignments based on their analysis and critical thinking.
Provide feedback on PowerPoint presentations and handouts.
Potential challenges:
This topic can be controversial, so it is important to ensure that all students feel comfortable and respected during discussions and activities.
Make sure to provide students with accurate and unbiased information, and avoid taking a stance on the topic.
Explanation:
Which statement describes the importance of Daniel Ellsberg to the Vietnam era
For the American people to be aware of all that the company did in during Vietnam War, Daniel Ellsberg was crucial. A covert report on American involvement in Vietnam was written by Ellsberg and given to the New York Times. Ellsberg left for home confident that the Wars had been a mistake.
What is Daniel Ellsberg's significance?Robert McNamara's confidential assessment on the Vietnam War, that had become notorious as the Pentagon Papers, included Daniel Ellsberg as an analyst.
What is Daniel Ellsberg's significance?Robert McNamara's confidential assessment on the Vietnam War, that had become notorious as the Pentagon Papers, included Daniel Ellsberg as an analyst.
TO know more about Vietnam War Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11375126
#SPJ1
Which event best completes the diagram to show the events of Grant's
Overland Campaign?
?
The Battle of
Spotsylvania
Court House
ends in a
draw.
The Union
suffers heavy
losses at the
Battle of Cold
Harbor.
OA. The Siege of Petersburg weakens the Confederate army.
B. The Battle of Mobile Bay shuts down the last Confederate port.
C. Both armies suffer losses at the Battle of the Wilderness.
OD. The Confederacy suffers defeat in the Battle of Nashville.
Answer:
The responsibility for the genocide in Rwanda cannot be solely attributed to one country or group. It was a complex situation that involved internal politics, ethnic tensions, and international power dynamics. However, it is true that France had a particularly close relationship with the Hutu government and supplied them with weapons, which were used to carry out the genocide. This fact alone makes France partially responsible for what happened in Rwanda.
Responsibility should be allocated based on the actions of each country and group involved in the genocide. The Hutu government, militias, and other groups that actively participated in the killings should bear the majority of the responsibility. However, the international community also bears some responsibility for their failure to intervene and prevent the genocide.
Belgium, which had previously colonized Rwanda, has acknowledged its role in creating the ethnic divisions that led to the genocide. They have also apologized for their failure to intervene and stop the killing. The United States and the UN have also acknowledged their failure to act and have taken steps to improve their response to future humanitarian crises.
France, on the other hand, has been more resistant to accepting responsibility for its role in the genocide. They have denied allegations that they trained and armed the Hutus, and have been slow to acknowledge their role in the conflict. However, in recent years, there have been efforts to address this issue. In 2019, French President Emmanuel Macron established a commission to investigate France's role in the genocide and improve relations with Rwanda.
In conclusion, responsibility for the genocide in Rwanda should be allocated based on the actions of each country and group involved. While France's role in supplying weapons to the Hutu government does make them partially responsible, the Hutu government and militias bear the majority of the responsibility. The international community also shares some responsibility for their failure to intervene and prevent the genocide. It is important for all countries involved to acknowledge their role in the conflict and work towards reconciliation and prevention of future atrocities.
Explanation:
Answer:
its C
Explanation:
When did War War One start
Answer:
July 28, 1914
Explanation:
Answer: July 1914 to November 11, 1918.
Explanation: I think your talking about World War One ...
Which of the following is most associated with the Reagan Doctrine?
A. Rollback
B. Dollar Diplomacy
C. Realpoltiik
D. Moral Diplomacy
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Rollback
Explain what motivated the students to continue with the freedom rides regardless of the anticipated vicious attack from the white supremacists
Answer:
They wanted equality.
Explanation:
An alternative to legislative and legal challenges, direct nonviolent actions—such as sit-ins, boycotts, and strikes—allowed for broader public participation and brought faster results.
The French Revolution began less than two decades after the American Revolution. In many ways, the
American experience was an inspiration for the citizens of France. But the people of the two countries had
different situations and had different concerns, which influenced the way each revolution began, progressed,
and ended. In this assignment you will write an essay that compares and contrasts the two revolutions.
In your essay, include information on the economic, political, or social conditions that were present; events
that took place as each revolution progressed; and the final outcome of each. Did the people achieve their
original goals? Did their goals change? Were they satisfied with the outcome or did conditions worsen?
To begin, consider the characteristics of each [ountry, such as the following:
• The status of ordinary citizens before the revolution
• The type of government in place
• The ability of the citizens to participate in their governance
• The people who stepped forward as leaders
• The taxes, laws, or social structure in place at the time
• The outcome of the revolution compared to its original goals
The American and French Revolutions were two landmark events that transformed the political and social landscape of the world. While they shared some similarities, such as their origins in Enlightenment ideas, they were driven by different economic, social, and political factors. In this essay, I will compare and contrast the two revolutions, examining the conditions that were present, the events that took place, and the final outcomes.
One of the key differences between the two revolutions was the economic situation of the two countries. In America, the colonists were generally prosperous and had a degree of economic independence, which allowed them to resist British attempts to tax and regulate them. In contrast, France was deeply in debt and had an oppressive tax system that placed a heavy burden on the poor and middle classes. This economic inequality was a major factor in the French Revolution.
Another key difference was the political structure of the two countries. America was a British colony and had a largely self-governing system based on representative assemblies. However, the colonists felt that they were being denied their rights as British subjects, leading to a demand for greater political autonomy. In contrast, France was an absolute monarchy, with a centralized system of government that gave little power to the people.
As the American Revolution progressed, the colonists formed a Continental Congress and declared their independence from Britain. They fought a long and bloody war, with the help of the French, and eventually succeeded in establishing a democratic republic based on the principles of individual liberty and popular sovereignty. In contrast, the French Revolution began with the storming of the Bastille in 1789, as the people demanded greater political representation and an end to the absolute monarchy. However, the revolution quickly descended into chaos, with the rise of radical factions and the Reign of Terror.
Despite the differences, both revolutions had important outcomes. The American Revolution led to the establishment of a democratic republic, based on the principles of individual liberty, political equality, and popular sovereignty. It also inspired other movements for independence and democracy throughout the world. In contrast, the French Revolution led to the overthrow of the monarchy and the establishment of a republic, but it also unleashed a wave of violence and terror that led to the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte and the restoration of the monarchy.
In conclusion, while the American and French Revolutions shared some similarities, they were driven by different economic, social, and political factors. The American Revolution succeeded in establishing a democratic republic based on individual liberty and popular sovereignty, while the French Revolution led to the overthrow of the monarchy but also unleashed a wave of violence and terror. Despite the different outcomes, both revolutions were important milestones in the history of democracy and inspired other movements for independence and democracy throughout the world.
Warren Harding's victory over Eugene Debs in the 1920 presidential election
indicated that:
A. most Americans weren't interested in socialism and found it too extreme.
B. a large number of Americans desired change and were upset with the status quo.
C. third-party candidates had a good chance of winning an election in the United States.
D. immigrant communities and urban workers were important voting blocs.
Based on these maps, which of these nations lost territory in Europe as a result
of World War II?
Advise your friend on how to effectively deal with stress resulting from failing a grade
Answer:
Explanation:
"Everyone fails at some point. Plenty of other people in our class are in the same position as you, and I know that you will all get through it." "Let me know how you're feeling, I'm here to listen for as long as you need me." "Let's take your mind off of things for a little bit and go for a walk."
Does some Anglo-Indian people converted to Hinduism.
Answer:
Yes, some Anglo-Indian people have converted to Hinduism, as well as other religions, over time. Conversion is a personal decision and can be influenced by a variety of factors, including cultural and social factors.
Explanation: