How far has a 15 kg object moved, when a force of 22 N is applied for 5 seconds if it started at 3 m/s?

Answer:

lithosphere

Explanation:

hope this helps you!!

Answer:

inertia   .

because yes

Answer:

The first one is the only one that is true all the time

Explanation:

The second one may be true if friction is high enough.

The other three are false all the time

Answer: The answer is A) 49 N(Newtons).

Answer:

Adding salt to the water increases the density of the solution because the salt increases the mass without changing the volume very much.

Explanation: the explanation is in a file

Answer:

Explanation:

conservation of momentum

m(u) + M(0) = (m + M)v

u = (m + M)v/m

u = (0.250 + 1.35)(11.9) / 0.250

u = 76.16

u = 76.2 m/s

That's a fairly massive, and slow, bullet.

Answer:

Explanation:

F = ma

a = F/m

a = 75/25

a = 3 m/s²

Answer: push force gravity tension and reverse force

Explanation: sense they are pushing the box there is a push force gravity because this is likely on earth tension because it is the reverse of gravity and the reverse force because you have to have the reverse of push

Answer:

Explanation:

70.0(5.00)(9.81) = 3,433.5 = 3430 N

To solve this we must be knowing each and every concept related to  centripetal force and its calculations. Therefore, the centripetal force acting on her is 3430 N.

The term centripetal relates to a propensity to gravitate toward the center. Centripetal refers to moving in the direction of the center. The force that maintains an item moving in a circular direction and helps it stay on the path is referred to as centripetal force.

Furthermore, centrifugal force is indeed the tendency of things to deviate from a circular route and fly in a straight line. People frequently confuse centripetal force with centrifugal force.

Mathematically,

F = m a

  = 70 acceleration

  = 70 × 5 × 9.81

 = 3430 N

Therefore, the centripetal force acting on her is 3430 N.

To know more about  centripetal force, here:

https://brainly.com/question/14249440

#SPJ5

Answer:

Acceleration = (final velocity - starting velocity) / time

4 = (x-1000) / 100

<br/>x = 1400 m/s

Explanation:

The final velocity of the rocket ship which is moving with an initial velocity of 1000 m/s and acceleration of 4 m/s² after 100 seconds is 1400 m/s.

Velocity of a moving body is the rate of its speed. Mathematically velocity is the ratio of distance travelled to the time taken with a unit of m/s. Acceleration is the rate of change in velocity of  moving body. The unit of acceleration is 4 m/s² .

Thus acceleration can be determined from the change in velocity with respect to the change in time. Now, the relation between initial velocity, acceleration,  a and time,  t with the final velocity is written in the equation below:

v = u + at.

Where, v is the final velocity and u be the initial velocity.

Given here the initial velocity is 1000 m/s. Acceleration of the rocket is 4 m/s² . Thus the velocity after 100 seconds is calculated as follows:

v = 1000 m/s +  ( 4 m/s² × 100 s )

  = 1400 m/s.

Hence, the speed of the rocket after 100 seconds will be 1400 m/s.

To find more about velocity, refer the link:

https://brainly.com/question/28738284

#SPJ5

Answer:

1.108 ×  [tex]10^{-3}[/tex]J

Explanation:

v=21.0v

Q=52.8×  [tex]10^{-6}[/tex]

E=?

V=E/Q

E=v ×Q

 =21 ×52.8 ×[tex]10^{-6}[/tex]

 =1108.8   ×[tex]10^{-6}[/tex]

E= 1.108 ×  [tex]10^{-3}[/tex]J

Negative

Because the car is moving up and the bug is moving down. but it also depends on the weather so choice between one of those two I think is Negative but I may be wrong.

Answer:

Heat flow

Explanation:

Answer:

fifth harmonic

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

For an ideal spring over a frictionless horizontal surface, stored energy is only a function of the spring constant k and the distance of compression. The mass of the block doing the compressing is irrelevant

Energy stored in the first example is

Em = ½kd²

Energy stored in the second example is

E₂m = ½k(2d)² = 4(½kd²) = 4Em

So the second situation has four times as much stored spring potential energy as the first situation

4 Em is correct

Good job!

Answer:

Explanation:

30 m/s • 3 hr •3600 s/hr / 1000 m/km = 324 km west

Answer:

Explanation:

PE = mgh

g = PE/mh

g = 15.0 / (0.200(0.500))

g = 150 m/s²

This is one strong astronaut if he can work in an environment where gravity is more than 15 times stronger than on earth.

Answer:

Explanation:

vA / vB = √(TA/(m/L)) / √(TB/(m/L))

The lengths are the same, so the L divides out to 1

The material is identical so the mass will be directly proportional to the cross sectional area of the string

vA / vB = √(TA/(πdA²/4)) / √(TB/(πdB²/4))

π/4 is common so divides out to 1

vA / vB = √(TA/dA²) / √(TB/dB²)

vA / vB = √(410/0.489²) / √(809/1.27²)

vA / vB = 41.407 / 23.396

vA / vB = 1.8488961...

vA / vB = 1.85

Answer:

*1) 100 Joule energy

*2) 101.2 m/s

Explanation:

*1) 1J = 1w

100J = 100w

*2) A 70-kg person will have to run at a speed of 101.2 m/s to have that amount of kinetic energy.

Answer:

n

Explanation:

TWO outcomes can be predicted the students will find:

When a constant mass of gas is cooled, its volume falls, and when the temperature is raised, its volume grows. The volume of the gas rises by 1/273 of its initial volume at 0 °C for every degree of temperature rise.

In layman's words, the volume of a fixed mass of gas is exactly proportional to temperature at constant pressure.

The teacher took two latex balloons and blew them up with helium gas to the same size. As she placed Balloon A in a -15° C freezer, its temperature decreases and that's why, the size of balloon A becomes smaller. Again she  placed Balloon B in the sun on 30° C day, its temperature increases and that's why, the size of balloon B becomes larger.

Learn more about temperature here:

https://brainly.com/question/11464844

#SPJ2

Crazy Wally Ok Ok ok hhahahaha

Answer:

Explanation:

F = mv²/R

F = 11.0(3.50²)/0.600 = 225 N

Answer: the current increases with each 3 volt and 9 volt. The relationship between resistance and current in a circuit is that the greater the resistance the less the current and the greater the current the less the resistance is. yayayay I could answer this I big brain :)

Answer:

I think some drawbacks are that since there are no solid walls meaning it is weak and if murphy's law is in place, the water will destroy the substance. Tsunami waves also happen very quickly so even if the water can travel thru the substance quickly, it probably won't be quick enough. This design could help if the wave is smaller because less destruction would occur.

Explanation:

yeah

Hi there!

a.

We can use the initial conditions to solve for w₀.

It is given that:

[tex]\frac{d\theta}{dt} = w_0e^{-\sigma t}[/tex]

We are given that at t = 0, ω =  3.7 rad/sec. We can plug this into the equation:

[tex]\omega(0)= \omega_0e^{-\sigma (0)}\\\\3.7 = \omega_0 (1)\\\\\omega_0 = \boxed{3.7 rad/sec}[/tex]

Now, we can solve for sigma using the other given condition:

[tex]2 = 3.7e^{-\sigma (8.6)}\\\\.541 = e^{-\sigma (8.6)}\\\\ln(.541) = -\sigma (8.6)\\\\\sigma = \frac{ln(.541)}{-8.6} = \boxed{0.0714s^{-1}}[/tex]

b.

The angular acceleration is the DERIVATIVE of the angular velocity function, so:

[tex]\alpha(t) = \frac{d\omega}{dt} = -\sigma\omega_0e^{-\sigma t}\\\\\alpha(t) = -(0.0714)(3.7)e^{-(0.0714) (3)}\\\\\alpha(t) = \boxed{-0.213 rad\sec^2}[/tex]

c.

The angular displacement is the INTEGRAL of the angular velocity function.

[tex]\theta (t) = \int\limits^{t_2}_{t_1} {\omega(t)} \, dt\\\\\theta(t) = \int\limits^{2.5}_{0} {\omega_0e^{-\sigma t}dt\\\\[/tex]

[tex]\theta(t) = -\frac{\omega_0}{\sigma}e^{-\sigma t}\left \| {{t_2=2.5} \atop {t_1=0}} \right.[/tex]

[tex]\theta = -\frac{3.7}{0.0714}e^{-0.0714 t}\left \| {{t_2=2.5} \atop {t_1=0}} \right. \\\\\theta= -\frac{3.7}{0.0714}e^{-0.0714 (2.5)} + \frac{3.7}{0.0714}e^{-0.0714 (0)}[/tex]

[tex]\theta = 8.471 rad[/tex]

Convert this to rev:

[tex]8.471 rad * \frac{1 rev}{2\pi rad} = \boxed{1.348 rev}[/tex]

d.

We can begin by solving for the time necessary for the angular speed to reach 0 rad/sec.

[tex]0 = 3.7e^{-0.0714t}\\\\t = \infty[/tex]

Evaluate the improper integral:

[tex]\theta = \int\limits^{\infty}_{0} {\omega_0e^{-\sigma t}dt\\\\[/tex]

[tex]\lim_{a \to \infty} \theta = -\frac{\omega_0}{\sigma}e^{-\sigma t}\left \| {{t_2=a} \atop {t_1=0}} \right.[/tex]

[tex]\lim_{a \to \infty} \theta = -\frac{3.7}{0.0714}e^{-0.0714a} + \frac{3.7}{0.0714}e^{-0.0714(0)}\\\\ \lim_{a \to \infty} \theta = \frac{3.7}{0.0714}(1) = 51.82 rad[/tex]

Convert to rev:

[tex]51.82 rad * \frac{1rev}{2\pi rad} = \boxed{8.25 rev}[/tex]

The angular velocity of the wheel at the bottom of the incline is 4.429 rad/sec

The angular velocity (ω) of an object is the rate at which the object's angle position is changing in relation to time.

For a wheel attached to an incline angle, the angular velocity can be computed by considering the conservation of energy theorem.

As such the total kinetic energy (K.E) and rotational kinetic energy (R.K.E) at a point is equal to the total potential energy (P.E) at the other point.

i.e.

P.E = K.E + R.K.E

[tex]\mathbf{mgh = \dfrac{1}{2}m(r \times \omega)^2 + \dfrac{1}{2}\times I \times \omega^2}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{gh = \dfrac{1}{2}(r \times \omega)^2 + \dfrac{1}{2}\times r^2 \times \omega^2}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{2 \times \dfrac{gh}{r^2} =\omega^2 + \omega^2}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{2 \omega^2=2 \times \dfrac{9.81 \times 8 m }{2.0 ^2} }[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{\omega^2=\dfrac{39.24 }{2}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{\omega=\sqrt{19.62 } \ rad/sec}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{\omega=4.429 \ rad/sec}[/tex]

Therefore, we can conclude that the angular velocity of the wheel at the bottom of the incline is 4.429 rad/sec

Learn more about angular velocity here:

https://brainly.com/question/1452612

The angular velocity of the wheel depends on the mass, radius and the

mode of rotation of the wheel (with or without slipping).

Reasons:

The given parameters are;

Radius of the wheel, r = 2.0 m

Height of the incline, h = 8.0 m

Required:

Angular velocity of the wheel at the bottom of the incline.

Solution:

The potential energy of the wheel at the top of the hill, P.E. = m·g·h

[tex]Sum \ of \ the \ kinetic \ energy \ of \ the \ wheel, \ K.E. = \mathbf{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2} \cdot m \cdot v^2 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot I \cdot \omega ^2}[/tex]

Where;

v = The translational velocity of the wheel = ω·r

I = The moment of inertia of the wheel = m·r²

Therefore'

[tex]Sum \ of \ K.E. = \displaystyle \frac{1}{2} \cdot m \cdot (\omega \cdot r)^2 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot m \cdot r^2 \cdot \omega ^2 = \mathbf{m \cdot r^2 \cdot \omega^2}[/tex]

At the bottom of the hill, the potential energy is converted to kinetic energy

Therefore;

P.E. = Sum of K.E.

m·g·h = m·r²·ω²

g·h = r²·ω²

[tex]\displaystyle \omega = \sqrt{ \frac{g \cdot h}{r^2} } = \mathbf{ \frac{\sqrt{g \cdot h} }{r}}[/tex]

Where;

g = Acceleration due to gravity ≈ 9.81 m/s²

Therefore;

[tex]\displaystyle \omega = \frac{\sqrt{9.81 \times 8} }{2} \approx \mathbf{ 4.43}[/tex]

Learn more about the law of conservation of energy here:

https://brainly.com/question/4723473

https://brainly.com/question/2292427

https://brainly.com/question/816294

Answer:

i cant see

Explanation:

but im smart

Answer:

[tex]\frac{a_{d}}{a_{i}} = \frac{(1 -mu)}{mu}[/tex]

= (1 - μ)/μ

Explanation:

Always draw a diagram!

Up the incline:

[tex]Fr_{max}[/tex] = maximum friction

[tex]Fr_{max}[/tex] = μk

k = R = mg.cos(45) = mg.sin(45)

Resolution of forces parallel to the slope:

F (Fp in the diagram) = force of propulsion

g = gravity

[tex]F - Fr_{max} = ma_{i}[/tex]

[tex]F -[/tex] μ.mg.cos(45) [tex]= ma_{i}[/tex]

Down the decline:

Resolution of forces:

[tex]mg.sin(45) - Fr_{max} = ma_{d}[/tex]

[tex]mg.sin(45) -[/tex] μ.mg.cos(45) [tex]= ma_{d}[/tex]

Then, find the ratio:

[tex]\frac{ma_{d}}{ma_{i}} = \frac{mg.sin(45) - mu.mg.cos(45)}{-F + mu.mg.cos(45)} \\\\ \frac{a_{d}}{a_{i}} = \frac{k - k.mu}{-F + k.mu} \\\\ = \frac{k(1 -mu)}{-F + k.mu}[/tex]

Potentially, there is no need to consider F in this situation, in which case:

[tex]\frac{a_{d}}{a_{i}} = \frac{k(1 -mu)}{k.mu} \\\\ = \frac{(1 -mu)}{mu}[/tex]

= (1 - μ)/μ