How did the views that oralists held about Deaf education differ from modern linguists?
O Oralists believed that the Deaf community only included those who were Deaf themselves, while modern linguists
realize that the Deaf community encompasses the family members and others who interact with the Deaf community
as well.
o Oralists believed that if Deaf children were exposed to sign language, they would struggle learning spoken or written
language whereas modern linguists have found that learning sign language actually enhances the ability of both Deaf
and hearing children to learn spoken and written language.
O Oralists preferred to teach methods of speechreading while modern linguists assert that it is necessary to also teach
some form of sign.
O Oralists advocated for the establishment of a Deaf state in the Western United States, while modern linguists support
an integration of both Deaf and hearing communities in all states.

Answer:

the second explanation is the one is right

Explanation:

The correct option about the views that oralists held about Deaf education differ from modern linguists is:

Oralists are considered to be all those people who are against teaching sign language to deaf people, this based on the fact that when they learn this language, in addition to separating them from the rest of the community, it prevents them from learning the written language and spoken.

For their part, modern linguists are totally against this perception, this is due to the fact that multiple studies carried out in the late 90s have shown that, on the contrary, sign language encourages the learning of the written and spoken language.

If you want to learn more about American Sign Language, you can visit the following link: https://brainly.com/question/17074981?referrer=searchResults

ano ang katulad ng command economy at Free-market​

Por qué Ulises considera fi eles a sus compañeros? ¿Qué elementos del relato te permiten deducirlo?