How did British policies and actions after the French and Indian War create dissent among some
colonists?
Answers
Answer:
British policies and actions after the French and Indian War created dissent among some colonists because the policies were just about tea and their action were just plain bullshít.
Explanation:
Related Questions
Examine the benefits and drawbacks of the ways in which Alexander used cultural diffusion in his conquest of other regions. Considering your list from the previous activity, write a paragraph of 100 to 150 words that analyzes the benefits and the drawbacks of cultural diffusion.
Answers
Answer:
There were immense qualities for Alexander, the great as a leader. One of the greatest qualities a leader should have been ambition. Alexander wanted to establish a vast empire and his ambition was fulfilled. He had conquered almost all the major countries of the Middle East and Asia Minor. He had also overthrown the Persian Empire by defeating the Persian king, Darius III.
He was one of the greatest military geniuses of all times. He was the inspiration of all the later rulers. His art of warfare was later studied by the later great rulers and generals in history. Alexander's leadership qualities in military and politics were obvious. He became the leader of powerful force which conquered all parts of the world including Asia. Alexander was also a great strategist.
Explanation:
Answer:
One benefit of cultural diffusion is the ability to communicate with others. When people have a common language and alphabet, it’s much easier to talk to others and share ideas. It also provides an opportunity to spread new ideas and discover different ways of thinking. A drawback of cultural diffusion is the loss of cultural identity, traditions, and languages. People could quickly lose the customs, celebrations, and stories that made their culture rich and unique.
Explanation:
plato answer. change it up so they dont suspect anything
SORRY THAT YOU GUYS HAVE TO READ THIS BUT:
Mi garganta está loca, él te seguirá lastimando
Mi garganta loca, chaqueta recta, traje blanco
IYKYK the song
Answers
Answer: this is gay my guy not going to lie.
Explanation:
Please help me with both of these question por favor
Answers
Answer:
i think is the last one but im not sure
Explanation:
Help me please
Describe Plessy vs. Ferguson:
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark 1896 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. The case stemmed from an 1892 incident in which African American train passenger Homer Plessy refused to sit in a car for Black people. Rejecting Plessy’s argument that his constitutional rights were violated, the Supreme Court ruled that a law that “implies merely a legal distinction” between white people and Black people was not unconstitutional. As a result, restrictive Jim Crow legislation and separate public accommodations based on race became commonplace.
Plessy v. Ferguson: Background and Context
After the Compromise of 1877 led to the withdrawal of federal troops from the South, Democrats consolidated control of state legislatures throughout the region, effectively marking the end of Reconstruction.
Southern Black people saw the promise of equality under the law embodied by the 13th Amendment, 14th Amendment and 15th Amendment to the Constitution receding quickly, and a return to disenfranchisement and other disadvantages as white supremacy reasserted itself across the South.
As historian C. Vann Woodward pointed out in a 1964 article about Plessy v. Ferguson, white and Black Southerners mixed relatively freely until the 1880s, when state legislatures passed the first laws requiring railroads to provide separate cars for “Negro” or “colored” pa_sengers.
Florida became the first state to mandate segr_gated railroad cars in 1887, followed in quick succession by Mississippi, Texas, Louisiana and other states by the end of the century.
(hope this helps can i plz have brainlist :D hehe)