Some would compare the Roaring 20s to an "Age of Intolerance." Which of the following BEST
supports why one would compare the two?

Answer:

The age of 20 is compared to the roaring in the age of intolerance as mostly the youthful multitude quite extend there assumption up to a matured being. There they blunder relative their dignity. They accept nothing harsh against their

conceptual understanding. Creates an ample egoism that inside intensify over ever truth. So they lack acceptance and mutual compromisation

. There no longer exist the line of value and virtue. Only to the insight of their daily work they understand what is explained before to them not what that is explained after what. Like evidently if from a childhood a man brought up in a chaos of peril disorder where bloodshed is only the solution the man inside in him will never understand the problem to deal with finding out other solution. Failure is not the option then, triumph is what they almost aspect every they pursue an argument.

Name three materials that can be recycled.

how did paralympics give confidence tothe differentely abled individuals?

Cassie was unhappy in her relationship with Richard. There wasn't anything wrong with him. He did cut her off occasionally while she was trying to speak, but he was generally a good guy. She just wanted something different. She decided that tonight she would break up with Richard. When he arrived at her house, she wanted to talk with him about it, but he rushed her out the door. "No time to talk now, Babe," he said. "We're late for our dinner reservations." She figured that she would tell him at the restaurant, near the end of the meal. She would even offer to pay. So they enjoyed a delicious meal together. Then, right before dessert, Cassie opened her mouth to let out the fatal words. "Richard..." she began, but Richard broke in, "Oh, Babe, I got a surprise for you." He pulled a small white envelope from his pocket. "Two front row tickets to see your favorite band, The Mountain Boys!" Cassie's mouth dropped. She loved the Mountain Boys. Richard backpedaled, "I'm sorry that I cut you off again. What was it that you wanted to tell me?" Cassie looked down at the piece of cake in front of her and replied, "Oh, I forgot. Nothing important."

Which type of irony is used?Immersive Reader
(2 Points)
a. verbal irony
b. situational irony
c. dramatic irony

Classical Roots vocabulary 10c assignment
book b

in which sentence is the complete predicate underlined

Choose the most relevant and credible evidence for this claim:
Kitty Hall li: Purrfect Politics, the sequel to last year's surprise hit movie Kitty
Hall, is going to be an even bigger success.
A. Film scholar Duclos Yowza explained that the popularity of online
cat videos made it almost inevitable that a film like Kitty Hall
would eventually sweep the nation.
B. The popularity of Kitty Hall has led to at least six write-in
campaigns to elect cats to local political positions.
C. While Kitty Halls popularity rose slowly, theaters have already sold
out the entire opening weekend of Kitty Hall Il more than three
weeks in advance.
D. Kitty Hall is a deeply silly and ridiculously overrated movie; its
popularity is only a fluke and will collapse once the public comes
to its senses.

What challenges you in a positive way? For example:
achieving a high score on a difficult test.

Is the answer correct yes or no .If it correct write it correct if it wrongs write the correct answer.

Read this sentence from the passage.
Then I can hear the small sounds: the sound of water dripping
from the mussels on the ceiling or of water dripping from
seaweeds that line the walls-small, silver splashes losing
themselves in the vastness of the pool and in the confused,
murmurous whisperings that emanate from the pool itself-the
pool that is never quite still.
What is the most likely reason the author includes the sentence
in the passage?
O to explain why the tidal pool is in a constant state of motion
O to show that some aspects of the tidal pool are difficult to understand
O to prove to the reader that the tidal pool is an experience for all of the
senses
to help the reader feel that he or she is experiencing the tidal pool
with the author
Asapppppp pleaseeee

How can we define color?
1.Color is the wavelength absorbed by an object.
2.Color is embedded in the atoms of an object
3.Color is the wavelength reflected off an object.

Finally, in 3-5 sentences explain why the seven deadly sins are seen repeatedly in stories and movies.

f the climax and pinnacle of science is our knowledge of the atom now, then what was known ten years ago must have been decidedly imperfect, for science has made great strides since then. What was known twenty years ago was even more imperfect, and the science of fifty years ago hardly worth knowing. Using a little imagination, we can ask what will become of the science of today, some twenty or thirty years from now? Unless the rate of scientific advance shows a notable slacking off (and there are no signs of this) our best knowledge of today will become decidedly frowsy1.


Since scientists have such overweening confidence in their own ability—in their collective ability, that is to say—it is no small wonder that they make no attempt to teach what are the limitations of science, for they hardly recognize any.


Yet there may be limits to what science can do. Consider this question: Can science disprove ghosts? In the supremely confident period, toward the end of the last century, when it was supposed that there was a conflict between Science and Religion, and Science was rapidly winning, it was the mark of an educated man to say “Science has proved that there are no such things as ghosts, they are merely the superstitions of the unenlightened.” Education is always behind the times, and much the same attitude is prevalent today; you can still hear people say, “Surely, science has proved that there are no ghosts.” And yet, is that so? Suppose, just suppose for the sake of argument, that ghosts can occasionally appear when the psychological conditions are just right, and suppose, what might quite well be true, that one necessary condition for the appearance of a ghost is the absence of a scientist: well then, “Science” (that is to say, scientists) would go on investigating ghost after ghost, and would “disprove” every one of them, and yet ghosts would continue to appear whenever the scientists were not looking.


This is a simple case, perhaps not a very important one, illustrating the impossibility of proving anything negative by the scientific method. At least it is enough to show that science is not infallible, and if science has any more serious defects than the inability to perceive an occasional spook in the corner, it is of the utmost importance that citizens, generally, should know what they are. Yet this sort of knowledge is very conspicuously absent from the populace at large and from the curriculums of institutes of learning. Non-scientists don’t even know what science can do; scientists are so obsessed with the past successes and future possibilities of their own specialty that they have no idea what the proper field of science in general is and no recognition that there are any limits. What they can’t do, some other scientists, presumably, can do, so that they come to think that science with a capital “S”—or rather its concentrated and distilled essence, the Scientific Method—is the universal cure-all for mankind.


They are wrong, for science is not a cure-all. The claims of the science fiends are preposterously exaggerated. Science has many important limitations, which will appear throughout this book in ever-increasing number. The idea that science is infallible and beyond criticism is a delusion, and even a dangerous one. The teaching of science only perpetuates this delusion, for it is always taught by scientists, who are so busy keeping up with science that they can never look at it from the outside. What with scientists who are so deep in science that they cannot see it, and non-scientists who are too overawed to express an opinion, hardly anyone is able to recognize science for what it is, the great Sacred Cow2 of our time.


John Dewey, a worshiper in the temple of science, said “the future of our civilization depends on the widening spread and deepening hold of the scientific habit of mind.” But perhaps there is more truth in an old wisecrack of Oliver Wendell Holmes: “Science is a good piece of furniture for a man to have in an upper chamber provided he has common sense on the ground floor.”


In the context of the passage as a whole, the first sentence of the third paragraph (“Yet . . . can do”) marks the transition between


a brief summary of a debate and a substantive analysis of that debate’s origins

A


an empirical investigation and a consideration of its theoretical implications

B


a description of a problem and an assessment of potential solutions

C


an explanation of a viewpoint and a rebuttal of that viewpoint

D


a challenge to a popular thesis and an argument in favor of that thesis

E

From this excerpt, Eliza can best be described as a
dutiful daughter.
humble teacher.
shrewd investor.
rich heiress.

what's my name bobby shmurda​

EASY QUESTION!!!! 10. True or False: The dictionary definition of a word is known as the denotative definition

Read the excerpt from Chapter 4 of Wheels of Change.

Annie Londonderry wasn't the only one who pushed the limits of time and distance on her two-wheeler. In the late 1890s, several women took the concept of riding a century—100 miles—to the extreme by peeling off two, three, four, or more centuries in a row. Perhaps the greatest female century rider performed outside the spotlight. Dora Rinehart’s exploits hardly ever were reported beyond the western United States, where the Colorado native earned the title “America’s Greatest Cyclienne.” Rinehart took up the bicycle to regain her strength after suffering scarlet fever. She started with short rides, but quickly built up her endurance. In 1896 alone, she pedaled 17,196 miles, more than any other woman in the United States. That included stretches of 10 days in July and 20 days from October 31 through November 19 when she rode a century every day.

Which statement from the excerpt is subjective?

How does the skin protect the body against illness? Select two options. The skin produces sweat and oil. The skin acts as a barrier. The skin identifies and coordinates an immune response. The skin produces mucus. The skin causes the body to produce antibodies.

Will mark BRAINLIST only if correct answer
Please need help ASAP only if u know the correct answer

My own house was an eyesore, but it was a small eyesore, and it had been overlooked, so I had a view of the water, a partial view of my neighbor's lawn, and the consoling proximity of millionaires—all for eighty dollars a month. What does this excerpt reveal about Nick? He is not particularly impressed by material wealth and fashionable appearances. He plans to move into another house as soon as the opportunity arises. He is wealthy enough to live in West Egg but not wealthy enough to rent a very nice place. He is desperate to become part of the elite society of West Egg and East Egg.

Which is the non-finite verb in the given sentence?
The students were asked to submit their assignments by Friday.

Help me please I'm giving brainiest five stars and heart!!! (*5* points!)

Please answer the following essay question:
What message about communication does Act One of The Phantom Tollbooth convey? Give examples to support your answer.
Answer in paragraph form using 5-7 complete sentences.

For the word below, click on the drop-down arrows to select the root and its meaning.
version
root: versi, ver, sion
meaning: to say, to send, to lead, to turn, to look

Help answer both questions and I will give you the brainless

Identify two examples of each:
assonance
end rhyme
Help help

Please help and thank you

Now, it's time to fill in a graphic organizer about the main topic and key details. First, write the main topic, or what the text is mostly about. Then, write in three key details that support the main topic. If you need help with the key details, use information from the earlier questions!​

Do three sentences about declaraction of rights?​

What moral dilemma does this excerpt express?

O Titinius feels guilty that Cassius is dead, and decides he must kill himself
O Brutus feels guilty that Cassius is dead, and decides to give him a garland
O Messala has to decide whether to tell Brutus about Cassius or to kill Pindarus
O Titinius has to decide whether to tell Brutus about Cassius or to kill Pindarus

I don’t really understand this question I’m not good with English

In the first paragraph, the speaker appeals to which of the following
1. Logos
2. Pathos
3. Ethos
A. 1 only
B. 2 only
C. 1 and 2
D. 1 and 3
E. All