Answer:
No, on the contrary, I am totally against the granting of extraordinary powers to any political leader, whatever the issue. On the contrary, I think that every government official must have limited powers, controlled by the other branches of government. In this way, they will not be able to exceed their prerogatives, affecting the freedoms and rights of citizens.
Granting extraordinary powers to any head or politically elected official could lead to abuse of power and trampling on the rights of the citizens. Hence, I am personally won't support such law.
Even though many countries were placed in a very tough position in a bid to fight the deadly virus, I feel empowering a president with extraordinary powers could affect other areas of governance, leading to abuse of power. With immense Power, other stakeholders would not have the ability to prove a point, hence, it is still very reasonable to allow decison making to be encompassing with other stakeholders such as ministers, and legislative members making decison.Learn more : https://brainly.com/question/22716761
Which of the following adjectives BEST describes an effectual, and true
Constitutional Government.
Answer:
Constitutionalism is a political movement and philosophy that states that the ruling power is bound to respect certain rights of its subjects. According to modern constitutionalism, the form of government must be based on a constitution.
Constitutionalism includes both the empowerment and the limitation of power, both granting power and specifying its scope and purpose. Constitutionalism is considered to promote the principles of the rule of law, the principle of predictability, and to prevent arbitrary administration of justice. According to constitutionalism, laws and judgments in countries with common law can be declared invalid because they are contrary to the constitution if it is done in accordance with the principle of transparency, usually by a constitutional court or a court with similar jurisdiction.
Imagine you are expelled from school for writing inappropriate content in an essay for English class. You sue the school for violating your 1st Amendment right to free speech. Who is the plaintiff in this case?
Answer:
You are.
Explanation:
The Plaintiff, the party who brings a legal action or in whose name it is brought—as opposed to the defendant, the party who is being sued.
So, since YOU are suing the school, you are the Plaintiff.
Hope I helped, Brainliest would be appreciated :)
Have a fantastic day!
-Aadi x
Identify two functions of international law in conflict situations.
Answer:
here you go <3
International law is divided or classified into two branches i.e. 'Public International law' and 'Private International law'
Explanation:
What is rule of Law ? Write any three characteristics rule of law.
Answer:
The laws are clear, publicized, and stable; are applied evenly; and protect fundamental rights, including the security of persons and contract, property, and human rights. The processes by which the laws are enacted, administered, and enforced are accessible, fair, and efficient.
ASAP.
According to the text, why are justices selected for life?
a. Justices are selected for life so they can make decisions without worrying about being fired.
b. Justices are selected for life so they can learn more over time about the U.S. Constitution.
c. Justices are selected for life so they can serve as part of the judicial branch of the government.
d. Justices are selected for life so they can have extraordinary experiences.
Answer:
don't have the text, but A is the best answer.