A baker used 48 cups of almond flour for a recipe. The ratio of cups of almond flour to cups of whole wheat flour that she used was 3 to 5. How many cups of whole wheat flour did the baker use?

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

20/5=4

45/5=9

cant simplify farther

Answer:

the answer is 5.

Step-by-step explanation:

Factors for 20: 1, 2, 4, 5, 10, and 20.

Factors for 45: 1, 3, 5, 9, 15, and 45.

Same numbers is 5.

the answer is 5.

Answer:

second is a answer cos X= x/i

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

sin X = x / u

NOT THE PREVIOUS ANSWER

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Let $10 tickets be (x)

Let $15 tickets be (y)

Now we know they sold 1000 tickets

And they earned 12,200 from sales

So we can say

X+Y=1000

10x+15y=12,200

We can do substitution

So lets find Y first

Y=1000-x (basically x+y=1000 but solved for Y)

10x+ 15 ( 1000-x)= 12,200

You’d get

10x+15000-15x=12200

Combine and solve for x and you’ll get

x=560

So we know that x is 560

We can just use that to solve for Y

Since X is 560 tickets

And 1000 tickets soled

1000-560=440

440 ($15) tickets

560 ($10) tickets

Answer:

41*

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Esther's is more expensive

Step-by-step explanation:

2 dollars per soda

Brainly plss

Answer:

There are 7 plants in the garden.

Step-by-step explanation:

8 + 6 (Half dozen) = 14

98 divided by 14 = 7

I hope I helped.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  1. yes

  2. no

Step-by-step explanation:

We can label the equations [1] and [2] to make the transformations to the equivalent system easier to describe.

1. The equivalent system is [1] +[2] and 2×[1]. Both of these are described as allowed transformations.

  [1] +[2] is (-x +2y) +(-3x +9y) = (10) +(-15)  ⇒  -4x +11y = -5

  2×[1] is 2(-x +2y) = 2(10)  ⇒  -2x +4y = 20

These resulting equations match the ones proposed for the equivalent system.

  yes, the systems are equivalent

__

2. The first equation of the proposed "equivalent" system is [1] +[2]. The second equation has no relation to the equations of the given system.

  [1] +[2] = (-2x +3y) +(-11x -13y) = (14) +(-6)  ⇒  -13x -10y = 8

  no, the systems are not equivalent

(This is also shown in the attached graph. The original system is in red; the "equivalent" system is in green. Equivalent systems have the same solution. These do not.)

Answer:

10.46

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the Number of additional pair = x

Ware house A :

855 + 92x - - - (1)

Warehouse B:

Initial cost per pair before 9

= 810 / 9 = $90

Additional 7% for pairs after 9

1.07 * 90 = 96.3

810 + 96.3x - - - (2)

810 + 96.3x = 855+ 92x

96.3x - 92x = 855 - 810

4.3x = 45

x = 45 / 4.3

x = 10.46

Additional pair be 10.46

Answer:

15.51

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

15.51

Step-by-step explanation:

The calculator is $49.50.

The radio is $114.99.

First, we add them together.

49.50+114.99 = 164.49

that is the total cost of both the radio and calculator.

Next, we subrtact  180.00-164.49= 15.51.

Answer:

x = 31°

Step-by-step explanation:

triangle = 180°

-there is a right angle

180-90 = 90

90-59= 31

31+90+59 = 180

Answer:

[tex]x=31^{\circ},\\y=5[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Since DB bisects [tex]\angle ABC[/tex], [tex]DC=DA[/tex]. Therefore, [tex]\fbox{$y=5$}[/tex].

From the isosceles base theorem, the measure of the angles adjacent to the congruent sides of an isosceles triangle are equal. Therefore, we can write the following equation:

[tex]2x+59+59=180,\\2x+118=180,\\2x=62,\\x=\fbox{$31^{\circ}$}[/tex].

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Its d because in the graph the line where they are at is positive and the answer shows (2,2) in the graph.

Answer:x+2=y

Step-by-step explanation:

To convert from the base currency, we multiply by the exchange rate. Just like multiplying to apply a commodity price. Indeed, our base currency can be viewed as the commodity in the quote. Say we need to convert €8m into dollars, by applying the exchange rate EUR/USD 1.25.

Answer:

substituting  & graphing

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2 pizzas

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:10.5 ml

Step-by-step explanation:do 75/50=1.5

Do 7 times 2.6 and get 7+2.5=10.5 miles

Answer:

X=63 y=27

Step-by-step explanation:

X and 117 are on a straight line. All straight lines = 180 degrees.

180 - 117 = 63

90 - 63 = 27

Answer:

a.  He used an incorrect time ratio converting hours to minutes.

d. He incorrectly concluded that she is not running fast enough.

Step-by-step explanation:

Looking at the Coach's method of conversion when converting time, he assumed that an hour had 15 minutes instead of 60 minutes. He therefore did not use the correct time ratio to convert hours to minutes.

The coach's calculations yielded an answer of 34 ft/s. This is way faster than 8.8 ft/ s so his deduction that she was not running fast enough to beat her fastest time is incorrect because at that inhumane speed, she did.

Answer: A.)He used an incorrect time ratio converting hours to minutes.

D.)He incorrectly concluded that she is not running fast enough.

Step-by-step explanation: i hope this helps :)

Answer:

48

Step-by-step explanation:

4x=148+44

4x=192

x=48

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

there are 360 degrees inside any 4-sided polygon

so add all four angle measures and set equal to 360:

3x + x + 44 + 148 = 360

4x + 192 = 360

4x = 168

x = 42

check:

3(42) + 42 + 44 + 148 should equal 360

126 + 42 + 192 = 360

168 + 192 = 360

360 = 360

Answer:

  La probabilidad de que la pieza elegida sea defectuosa, P(D), 0.0385

La máquina con mayor probabilidad de haber producido la pieza defectuosa es A

Step-by-step explanation:

Sea D= "la pieza es defectuosa" y N= "la pieza no es defectuosa". La información del problema puede expresarse en el diagrama de árbol adjunto.

Para calcular la probabilidad de que la pieza elegida sea defectuosa, P(D), por la propiedad de la probabilidad total,

P(D) = P(A) · P(D/A) + P(B) · P(D/B) + P(C) · P(D/C) =

= 0.40 · 0.03 + 0.35 · 0.04 + 0.25 · 0.05 = 0.0385

Debemos calcular P(B/D). Por el teorema de Bayes,

P(B/D)= P(B) x P(D/B)   /  P(A) x P(D/A) + P(B) x P(D/B) +P(C) x P(D/C)  

          =        0.35 · 0.04 /     0.40 · 0.03 + 0.35 · 0.04 + 0.25 · 0.05

Calculamos P(A/D) y P(C/D), comparándolas con el valor de P(B/D) ya calculado. Aplicando el teorema de Bayes, obtenemos:

0.012

0.0385

P(A/D)= 0.311

0.014

0.0385

P(B(D)=0.363

0.0125

0.0385

P(C/D)=0.324

 La máquina con mayor probabilidad de haber producido la pieza defectuosa es A

Answer:s-9

Step-by-step explanation: Decreased means subtract . and you are subtracting s from 9.

Hope it helps

Answer:

600 im pretty sure

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

6,300 divide by 900 would equal 7

Answer:

7 beams

Step-by-step explanation:

To find how many beams can be made from steel, we have to find how many times 900 goes into 6,300. So our equation is:

6,300 ÷ 900 = 7

So you can make 7 beams out of 6,300 pounds of steel (and you won't have any steel left.)

Answer Mr. Gerard speed was at most 25 miles per hour before the curve

Step-by-step explanation:

How to solve the speed Mr. Gerard was driving before the curve

Let’s just assume that Gerard went exactly the speed limit 15 miles per hour (mph) after when he slowed down by 10 miles per hour and drove around the curve. The reason why I’m using exactly 15mph is because it’s the max speed he can go. He can go 15 miles per hour and still be safe, but it’s just that he can’t go any faster than that.

Now, you can do 15 + 10 to find the speed he went before he drove around the curve. So, that would be 25mph before he drove around the curve.

You might be asking: What if he went slower than 25mph before he drove around the curve, and what if he went faster than 25mph?

-When he drives exactly 25mph and slows down by 10mph when he makes the turn around the curve, he’s going exactly 15mph which it safe for him because it’s not faster than 15mph.

-It could be possible that he went slower than 25mph before he drove around the curve, but he still will be safe because when he makes the turn around the curve and slows down by 10 miles per hour, now he’ll reach below 15 miles per hour which is even safer for him. Here’s an example for you to understand: Let’s say he drove 23mph before the curve (which is less than 25mph). As soon as he makes the turn around the curve, he slows down by 10mph. So after he goes around the curve, he’s going 13mph, which is less than the speed limit 15mph. You can take any number less than 25mph and he’ll still be safe because it will be less than 15mph.

-Now, if he went faster than 25mph, he wouldn’t be safe anymore because after when he slows down by 10mph and goes around the curve, he’ll be above the speed limit of 15mph. Here’s an example for you to understand: Let’s say he drove 27mph before the curve (which is faster than 25mph). As soon as he makes the turn around the curve, he slows down by 10mph. So after he goes around the curve, he’s going 17mph, which is faster than the speed limit 15mph.

Answer: Mr. Gerard speed was at most 25 miles per hour before the curve

Graphing it

A way to graph this is to write out a compound inequality. You can write it as:

0 < y ≤ 25  ⇒ Where any speed has to be less than or equal to 25 miles per hour, because 25 miles per hour is the most/biggest speed Mr. Gerard can drive. But it has to be greater than 0 because you can’t go negative miles per hour, or 0 miles per hour

The graph is shown below ↓

I don’t know what graph you want, or how your teacher wants you to graph it. So I put two options for you :)

I hope you understand and that this helps with your question! :)