22. Though the New Deal staved off complete collapse of the US economy, the item that ultimately ended the Great Depression was

Capitalism, socialism, and communism all rose to prominence as a result of the Industrial Revolution.

Production and income both significantly increased throughout the Industrial Revolution, which fueled the expansion of capitalism. An economic system known as capitalism is built on the concept of private ownership of the equipment of production, with market demand driving profits. Capitalists strove to enhance their profits as new industries and markets developed, which resulted in the development of big businesses and the concentration of wealth in the hands of a select few. The rise of capitalism also brought about social injustice and labour exploitation, which sparked the emergence of communism and socialism as competing economic systems.

To Know more about Industrial Revolution Visit:

brainly.com/question/855594

#SPJ1

Answer:

Peter is in the locomotor stage of physical development. At this stage, children are beginning to develop their large motor skills and are exploring their surroundings through crawling and walking.

Answer:

It's A. The banking system.

Explanation:

The banking system is what Van Buren believed the strength of the American economy was based on. Martin Van Buren was the eighth President of the United States and served from 1837 to 1841. He was a key figure in the development of the American financial system and believed that a strong banking system was essential to a healthy economy. Van Buren was a supporter of the Independent Treasury System, which aimed to create a decentralized banking system that would prevent the concentration of wealth in a few hands. He believed that a strong banking system would provide the credit necessary for commerce and industry to thrive. The Specie Circular was a policy that Van Buren implemented during his presidency that required the government to accept only gold or silver in payment for federal lands, which was intended to support the banking system by preventing the circulation of paper money. However, it ultimately led to a financial crisis and contributed to Van Buren's defeat in the presidential election of 1840.

Hope this might help you! If not, sorry about that. :]

The Separate-But-Equal Doctrine was a legal doctrine in the United States that allowed for the racial segregation of public facilities, such as schools and transportation, as long as they were "equal" in quality.

Legal doctrine is a set of rules and principles which courts use to interpret and apply laws. It is based on precedent, which is a court's decision in a previous similar legal case. In some countries, legal doctrine is also sometimes referred to as jurisprudence. Legal doctrine helps to develop more consistent rulings in similar disputes and to help ensure that the law is applied in a predictable and consistent manner.

This doctrine was used to justify discrimination against African Americans and other minority groups. The doctrine was established in 1896 in the Supreme Court case of Plessy v. Ferguson, and it remained in effect until 1954 when the Supreme Court reversed its decision in the case of Brown v. Board of Education.

To learn more about legal doctrine
https://brainly.com/question/704009
#SPJ1

Answer:Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria and the Ottoman Empire

Explanation:

The freedom of the press is a fundamental democratic

 ideal and a fundamental right in the United States. 

A free press, which is safeguarded by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, aids in preserving the balance of power in politics.

Answer:

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists were two political factions that emerged during the late 18th century in the United States during the debate over the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.

The Federalists supported the Constitution and favored a strong central government. They believed that a strong central government was necessary to maintain order, protect the rights of citizens, and promote economic growth. They also supported the idea of a powerful executive branch and favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution.

In contrast, the Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution and were skeptical of a strong central government. They believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government and threatened individual rights. They favored a more limited government and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists also demanded the inclusion of a Bill of Rights to protect individual liberties.

Overall, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists differed on their views on the role and power of the federal government, as well as their interpretation of the Constitution. These differences ultimately led to the drafting and adoption of the Bill of Rights, which helped to reconcile the two factions and establish a framework for the federal government that continues to this day.

Explanation:

Answer:

Granting citizenship to enslaved people would have incentivized them to work harder and become more invested in the success of the empire, ultimately leading to increased productivity and economic growth. Additionally, it would have improved the empire's reputation as a fair and just society, potentially reducing the likelihood of rebellion or uprisings.

Explanation:

Answer: Roman slaves were seen as merely the property of their masters to do with as they wished. Slaves had no rights at all and certainly no legal status or individuality. They could not create relations or families, nor could they own property.

It would benefit the slave owners.

Explanation: Please give Brainlist.

Hope this helps!!!!

The most effective leaders are those who are able to balance both intuitive thinking and strategic analysis, and who are open to new ideas and perspectives.

By combining these approaches, leaders can make more informed decisions that are grounded in both logic and intuition, and that take into account the needs and desires of their followers or constituents.

Strategic analysis is a process of researching and evaluating an organization's internal and external environment to develop insights into its current position, potential opportunities, and threats, and develop a plan of action to achieve its goals. It involves gathering and analyzing information about an organization's resources, capabilities, strengths, weaknesses, and market trends to determine the best course of action for achieving the organization's objectives.

The purpose of strategic analysis is to identify potential areas of growth, identify areas that require improvement, and develop strategies to address them. It can involve a range of analytical tools and methods, such as SWOT analysis, PESTEL analysis, and competitor analysis.

To learn more about strategic analysis, click

brainly.com/question/15200993

#SPJ1

Answer:

D. Separation of powers

Explanation:

The principles of separation of powers, which hold that the various departments of government should be given separate powers and responsibilities, are those that are outlined in the paragraph. This idea played a significant role in both the American and French revolutions, which both aimed to create democratic systems of government that protected citizens' rights and liberties by limiting the scope of the executive branch.

Answer: The Common enemy that the Would-be Americans had(The British forces), along with the anger from them being forced into having be ruled over. And their vast supplies from years of being there for about a century. And allies from other country's wanting to help them in the effort.

Answer:

Mead: Mead is a fermented drink made from honey, water, and yeast. It was popular in medieval Europe and was often associated with the Vikings.

Ale: Ale is a type of beer that is brewed using a warm fermentation process. It was the most common alcoholic drink in medieval Europe and was often brewed in monasteries and taverns.

Wine: Wine was also popular in medieval Europe, especially in areas with suitable climate and soil for grape growing. It was often consumed by the wealthy and was seen as a symbol of wealth and status.

Cider: Cider is a fermented drink made from apples. It was popular in medieval England, where it was often made in monasteries and was consumed by both the wealthy and the poor.

Kombucha: Kombucha is a fermented tea drink that originated in China and was consumed in medieval Europe. It was made by fermenting sweetened tea with a culture of bacteria and yeast.

Kvass: Kvass is a fermented drink made from rye bread and water. It was popular in medieval Russia and was often consumed by peasants.Mead: Mead is a fermented drink made from honey, water, and yeast. It was popular in medieval Europe and was often associated with the Vikings.

Ale: Ale is a type of beer that is brewed using a warm fermentation process. It was the most common alcoholic drink in medieval Europe and was often brewed in monasteries and taverns.

Wine: Wine was also popular in medieval Europe, especially in areas with suitable climate and soil for grape growing. It was often consumed by the wealthy and was seen as a symbol of wealth and status.

Cider: Cider is a fermented drink made from apples. It was popular in medieval England, where it was often made in monasteries and was consumed by both the wealthy and the poor.

Kombucha: Kombucha is a fermented tea drink that originated in China and was consumed in medieval Europe. It was made by fermenting sweetened tea with a culture of bacteria and yeast.

Kvass: Kvass is a fermented drink made from rye bread and water. It was popular in medieval Russia and was often consumed by peasants.

Explanation:

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Answer:

Geography played a significant role in shaping life in the West during the westward movement. The West was characterized by a diverse landscape that included mountains, deserts, grasslands, and forests, and these physical features had a profound impact on the development of the region.

One of the most significant effects of geography was the availability of natural resources. The West had abundant natural resources, including minerals, timber, and fertile soil. This fueled the westward movement, as settlers sought land and economic opportunity.

However, the geography of the West also presented challenges. The harsh climates, rugged terrain, and lack of water made settlement and travel difficult. Settlers had to adapt to the environment by using new farming techniques, building irrigation systems, and developing new modes of transportation.

The geography of the West also had a significant impact on the Native American populations who lived there. Many Native American tribes had adapted to their local environments and had developed unique cultures and ways of life. As settlers moved westward, they often disrupted these communities, leading to conflict and displacement.

In conclusion, geography played a significant role in shaping life in the West during the westward movement. It provided abundant natural resources but also presented challenges that settlers had to overcome. The impact of geography on the Native American populations was also significant, leading to significant changes in their ways of life.

Explanation:

Answer:

C. strikes

Explanation:

During World War II, strikes by workers were considered unpatriotic because they disrupted the production of war materials and equipment needed to support the war effort. The United States government and many Americans believed that workers had a responsibility to put aside their personal grievances and work together for the common good during the war. Strikes were seen as undermining this shared national goal and potentially putting American soldiers in danger. As a result, the government passed legislation to restrict the right to strike and unions agreed not to strike during the war.

Most likely A

B, E definitely not

The decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan was a highly controversial one and has been debated for decades. There is no single "logical" conclusion that can be drawn to justify the use of the atomic bomb based solely on the atrocities that American soldiers experienced in the Pacific.

While it is true that American soldiers faced brutal conditions and suffered significant casualties during the Pacific W.a.r, it is important to recognize that the decision to use the atomic bomb had complex and multifaceted motivations. These included factors such as the desire to bring a swift end to the w.a.r, the fear of a protracted invasion of Japan, and the desire to demonstrate American military superiority to the Soviet Union.

Moreover, it is important to recognize that the atomic bombings had devastating consequences for the Japanese people, causing enormous loss of life and long-term health effects. Some historians argue that Japan was already on the verge of surrender, and that the use of the atomic bomb was unnecessary and immoral. Others argue that the bombing was a necessary step to end the war and save American lives.

In conclusion, there is no single "logical" conclusion that can be drawn to justify the use of the atomic bomb based solely on the atrocities experienced by American soldiers in the Pacific. The decision to use the atomic bomb was a complex one with multiple factors and motivations, and it continues to be a subject of debate and discussion among historians and policymakers.

learn more about atomic bomb: https://brainly.com/question/140986

#SPJ1

Can you explain more, please?

Answer:

Explanation:

"Our country right or wrong" is a phrase often associated with defending the Vietnam War. The idea behind this phrase is that one should support their country regardless of its actions. Those who defended the Vietnam War believed that the United States had a moral obligation to stop the spread of communism in Southeast Asia, and that supporting the war effort was necessary to fulfill that obligation. They also believed that opposing the war was unpatriotic and undermined the efforts of American soldiers. However, critics of the war argued that blind support of the government and military actions can lead to unjust and immoral actions, and that it is possible to love one's country while still criticizing its policies and actions.

Answer:

Explanation:

The colonization of Africa by European powers was driven by a complex set of economic, political, and psychological factors. Some of the psychological factors that may have influenced European countries to colonize Africa include:

Racism and Eurocentrism: European colonizers saw themselves as superior to Africans and believed that they had a duty to "civilize" and "Christianize" the "backward" peoples of Africa. This racist and Eurocentric view was reinforced by the social Darwinist theory that argued that Europeans were biologically superior to other races.

Nationalism and Imperialism: The desire for power and prestige also played a role in the colonization of Africa. European countries were in competition with each other for political and economic dominance, and the acquisition of colonies was seen as a way to enhance their status as imperial powers.

Economic reasons: The colonization of Africa also had economic motivations. European countries wanted to exploit Africa's natural resources, such as gold, diamonds, and other minerals, and establish new markets for their goods. The slave trade had also created a demand for African labor, which European colonizers continued to exploit even after the abolition of the slave trade.

Psychological factors: European colonizers were often driven by a sense of adventure and the desire to explore new lands. Many Europeans were also motivated by a sense of duty to spread Christianity and Western civilization to Africa, which they saw as a "dark continent" in need of enlightenment.

In summary, the colonization of Africa was a complex process that was driven by a variety of factors, including racism, nationalism, imperialism, economic interests, and psychological factors such as a sense of adventure and a desire to spread Christianity and Western civilization.

Answer:

Explanation:

The text of the Constitution itself does not explicitly state whether or not capital punishment is constitutional. The Fifth Amendment mentions "capital crime" as a possible reason for someone to be deprived of life, but it does not necessarily endorse capital punishment as a form of punishment. The Eighth Amendment prohibits "cruel and unusual punishments," which could potentially include capital punishment, depending on one's interpretation.

Therefore, it is difficult to say which side has the better argument based solely on the text of the Constitution. Both sides can make reasonable arguments based on their interpretations of the Constitution.

As for the proposal that made reference to "capital crimes" in the Fifth Amendment and a ban on capital punishment in the Eighth Amendment, it is not necessarily contradictory. The Fifth Amendment allows for the possibility of capital punishment, but it does not require it. The Eighth Amendment prohibits "cruel and unusual punishments," which could potentially include capital punishment if it is deemed to be cruel or unusual. So, it is possible for someone to argue that while capital punishment may be allowed in some cases, it should be banned as a cruel and unusual punishment.

Explanation:

1) Differences between the states that emerged in the savanna and forest zones of Ghana:

Military: The savanna states, such as the Kingdom of Dagbon and Mamprusi, had a strong military tradition and a centralized system of governance, which allowed them to expand their territories through conquest. In contrast, forest states such as the Asante and Fante had a more decentralized system of governance and relied on alliances and diplomacy to maintain their power and influence.

Succession: In the savanna states, succession to the throne was usually based on the principle of primogeniture, where the eldest son inherited the throne. In contrast, in forest states, succession was more fluid, and the king was often chosen from among a group of eligible candidates.

Religion: In the savanna states, Islam played a significant role in shaping the culture and society, while in forest states, traditional African religions were more prevalent. However, some forest states, such as the Ashanti Empire, also embraced Islam as a religion.

Economic: The savanna states were more focused on trade, particularly with the trans-Saharan trade routes, while the forest states were more involved in agriculture and mining, particularly gold mining.

2)The role of geography in shaping the socio-cultural practices of these two zones: The differences between the savanna and forest states can be partly attributed to the geographical conditions of each zone. The savanna region is characterized by open grasslands, which made it easier for the savanna states to engage in long-distance trade and expand their territories through conquest. In contrast, the forest region is characterized by dense forests, which made it harder to expand territories and engage in long-distance trade. The forest states, therefore, relied on alliances and diplomacy to maintain their power and influence. The forest region also had a more diverse ecology, which allowed for a variety of economic activities, including agriculture and mining. This, in turn, influenced the socio-cultural practices of the forest states, such as their emphasis on agriculture and their use of gold as a symbol of power and wealth.

In conclusion, while geography played a role in shaping the differences between the savanna and forest states of Ghana, other factors such as culture, religion, and economic activity also contributed to these differences. It is essential to take a holistic view of these factors when analyzing the history and development of these states.

Answer:

The united states secretly sold weapons to Iran and use the Iranian to get the weapons to the contras

Explanation:

Explanation:

Federalist 51 is an essay written by James Madison, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, which focuses on the importance of the separation of powers and checks and balances in government. While the essay does not explicitly address the rights of minorities, it does propose a system of government that is designed to protect individual rights and prevent the tyranny of the majority.

Madison argues that the separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government creates a system of checks and balances that helps to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. This system ensures that no single group or individual has too much influence over government decisions, which helps to protect the rights of all citizens, including minorities.

In addition, Madison suggests that the size and diversity of the United States makes it less likely that any one group will be able to dominate the political system. He writes, "In the extended republic of the United States, and among the great variety of interests, parties, and sects which it embraces, a coalition of a majority of the whole society could seldom take place on any other principles than those of justice and the general good."

Overall, while Federalist 51 does not specifically address the rights of minorities, Madison's emphasis on the importance of a system of checks and balances and the diversity of interests in the United States suggests that he believed in protecting the rights of all citizens, including those in the minority.

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Executive agreements are agreements made between the President and another country, which do not require Senate ratification like treaties do. They are legally binding agreements that allow the President to take action on behalf of the United States without the need for congressional approval. These agreements can cover a wide range of topics, including trade, defense, and diplomacy, and are used as a tool of foreign policy. Option d) is the correct answer.

Answer:

As a wealthy creole living in Venezuela, my upbringing has been privileged, and I have received a good education. My education has taught me about Enlightenment ideas, particularly the concepts of life, liberty, and property. These ideas have challenged my worldview, and I have come to understand that they have universal applicability.

However, my comfortable life is a product of my family's wealth, which is deeply intertwined with the Spanish colonial system. Although I am not in a position of power, I am part of a privileged class that benefits from the status quo. This realization poses a dilemma as a revolution spreads throughout the country, and I am faced with choosing between supporting Venezuelan independence or supporting Spain and maintaining my current way of life.

On the one hand, supporting Venezuelan independence aligns with my understanding of the universality of Enlightenment ideas. The desire for independence is not just about political power but also about the rights of individuals to govern themselves and control their own destinies. Supporting Venezuelan independence would also mean breaking away from a colonial system that has oppressed and exploited many of our fellow citizens.

On the other hand, supporting Spain would mean maintaining the status quo that has provided me with a comfortable life. It would also mean rejecting the ideals of the Enlightenment, which I have come to believe in. Furthermore, supporting Spain would mean supporting a system that has perpetuated inequality, exploitation, and oppression.

Ultimately, I must make a choice that is in line with my values and beliefs. I cannot ignore the realities of my privilege and the role that my family's wealth has played in my life. However, I also cannot ignore the fact that my education has taught me about universal ideals that apply to all people, regardless of social status.

Therefore, I must support Venezuelan independence. Although this may mean sacrificing some of my own privileges and comforts, it is a choice that is consistent with my beliefs and values. By supporting independence, I can help create a new society that is founded on equality, freedom, and justice.

Hope this helps! I'm sorry if it doesn't. If you need more help, ask me! :]

Answer:

Judicial review is the power of the courts to review and potentially strike down actions taken by the legislative or executive branches of government that are deemed to be unconstitutional. This power is not explicitly mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, but it has been recognized and utilized by the Supreme Court in a number of landmark cases.

The legal case that established the use of judicial review was Marbury v. Madison, which was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1803. In that case, the Court ruled that the Judiciary Act of 1789, which had been passed by Congress, was unconstitutional. This decision established the principle that the Supreme Court has the authority to declare a law unconstitutional and therefore null and void.

Explanation:

Answer: Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Explanation:

Judicial review is a process by which courts review the legality of the actions of the other branches of government, such as executive and legislative branches. Judicial review confirms that the actions of the other branches are consistent with the law and the Constitution. The landmark case of Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the use of judicial review in the United States. In this case, Chief Justice John Marshall established the principle of judicial review by ruling that it was the Supreme Court’s duty to determine whether laws passed by Congress were constitutional or not. This ruling established the Supreme Court as the final arbiter of the laws of the United States.

Answer:

First, you will need to do some research on the lure and consequences of World War I. Look for images that depict the military power, destruction of towns/cities/countries, death, and causalities. You can use search engines, historical archives, or photo databases to find appropriate images. Be sure to keep track of your sources so you can list them on the reference page.

Once you have a collection of images, organize them according to the layout plan. Your title page should clearly state what your photo montage is about. The photo montage should include a balance of images that show both the benefits and costs of total war. Consider the composition, color scheme, and tone of each image as you arrange them on the page. You may need to resize or crop some images to fit the layout.

Finally, construct a response that explains your photo montage. Use the images to illustrate your points and provide context for each one. Discuss the significance of the benefits and costs of World War I, and how they impacted the world at the time and beyond. Be sure to reference your sources on the reference page.

Remember to be creative and thoughtful in your approach to this performance task. Good luck!